Oh, and hospital employees are forbidden to put any new entries into Vaers. Oh, oh and OSHA said in order to prevent people from being discouraged from getting their injections, they are waiving the rule that says you have to report an injury that is related to the injections!
You're certainly right on the general principle, and whistle-blowers have confirmed that hospitals are avoiding reporting serious effects. But reported events are going to skew toward the more serious anyway. A strange rash is less likely to get reported than heart failure.
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/international-news/medicine/vaers-admits-fewer-than-1-of-vaccine-adverse-events-are-reported/?cf_chl_jschl_tk=pmd_i7m8uABgN4dgLi3EsCOPInCSmSR5EEn0Eixdv_GxBxA-1635427654-0-gqNtZGzNAtCjcnBszQpR
Original article. With working links to sources
Archived?
I like where your heads at, but that's bad logic. A death is much more likely to be reported than say shortness of breath
Oh, and hospital employees are forbidden to put any new entries into Vaers. Oh, oh and OSHA said in order to prevent people from being discouraged from getting their injections, they are waiving the rule that says you have to report an injury that is related to the injections!
You're certainly right on the general principle, and whistle-blowers have confirmed that hospitals are avoiding reporting serious effects. But reported events are going to skew toward the more serious anyway. A strange rash is less likely to get reported than heart failure.
Except it was twice that number of deaths before the CDC manipulated the numbers.