The vaccine is a weapon of war.
Those who have to take it against their preference are casualties.
Brothers wounded in war get Purple Hearts.
They don’t get ostracized.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (56)
sorted by:
I've talked about this quite frequently that VAERS data cannot cannot cannot be used to make these types of inferences, because VAERS data both REQUIRES reporting of cases that are unlikely to be related to the vaccine, AND cases are not in any way vetted before being posted to VAERS. It's designed as a resource for medical researchers to focus in on very specific areas, and doesn't actually prove that even a single person died from the vaccine. There could be absolutely ZERO deaths from the vaccine, and VAERS would look exactly the way it does today.
VAERS data is available to the public so that all researchers have access to it, but that doesn't mean its data is curated or usable by laypeople.
I'd encourage you to read the how-to page on the VAERS website itself to see these limitations and why the type of conclusions that people like Peters draw simply cannot be supported based on how VAERS itself says it works.
https://vaers.hhs.gov/data/dataguide.html
Hey! We found a glowie!
You’re welcome to interpret it that way, but you’re still using a basic assumption that VAERS isn’t supporting.
That’s like me assuming that if the number of asteroids that crash through houses is underreported, then there must be millions of asteroids crashing through houses and asteroids are a significant threat to homeowners.
I can assume that based on under reporting to the asteroid-house-collision database, but I’m still assuming that asteroids regularly crash into houses to reach that conclusion.
Actually, my database would NOT have 10,000,000 meteor crashes.
It would have 10,000,000 REPORTS of POSSIBLE meteor crashes.
Some people would report a meteor crash based on roof damage. Some would report that their car disappeared and maybe it was a meteor. Some people would find a pebble in their driveway and assume maybe it came from space. All of them would be in my database.
That's how VAERS works. You don't need to have felonious false reports to have bad data in VAERS.
You just need to have randos who assume that maybe their sniffles came from the vaccine. Or doctors who are 99.999% positive that their 97 year old alcoholic cancer patient died from unrelated causes, but they also had the vaccine a week ago and therefore MUST report it.
And so on and so forth.
That's what I'm saying. VAERS does NOT pretend to have proven a single incident from the vaccine. It reports on incidents that happened after the vaccine was administered, and many of those reports do not come from doctors. The reports that do come from doctors are required based on when the vaccine was administered, NOT on the doctor's professional opinion that the vaccine actually caused the problem.
The vaccine has not been proven to be a cause of the incident in any case before it gets sent to VAERS. As the page states.
It's basically a tip hotline. If the police open up a hotline to look for a suspect and get 10,000 reports, then they don't assume that anywhere close to 10,000 people saw that suspect in 10,000 different locations. They just assume a lot of people THINK they saw the suspect and reported it just to be safe. Then the police can go look into that tip and see if it was actually the suspect.
And the vast, vast majority of the time, the tip is wrong. But the tip line remains open, just in case.
Which is how VAERS works. It's a tip line. Just in case. But it's not telling you how many issues there are with the vaccine. It's telling you how many POSSIBLE issues there might have been based on reports, and those reports have not been verified when they show up in VAERS.