The vaccine is a weapon of war.
Those who have to take it against their preference are casualties.
Brothers wounded in war get Purple Hearts.
They don’t get ostracized.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (56)
sorted by:
Actually, my database would NOT have 10,000,000 meteor crashes.
It would have 10,000,000 REPORTS of POSSIBLE meteor crashes.
Some people would report a meteor crash based on roof damage. Some would report that their car disappeared and maybe it was a meteor. Some people would find a pebble in their driveway and assume maybe it came from space. All of them would be in my database.
That's how VAERS works. You don't need to have felonious false reports to have bad data in VAERS.
You just need to have randos who assume that maybe their sniffles came from the vaccine. Or doctors who are 99.999% positive that their 97 year old alcoholic cancer patient died from unrelated causes, but they also had the vaccine a week ago and therefore MUST report it.
And so on and so forth.
That's what I'm saying. VAERS does NOT pretend to have proven a single incident from the vaccine. It reports on incidents that happened after the vaccine was administered, and many of those reports do not come from doctors. The reports that do come from doctors are required based on when the vaccine was administered, NOT on the doctor's professional opinion that the vaccine actually caused the problem.
The vaccine has not been proven to be a cause of the incident in any case before it gets sent to VAERS. As the page states.
It's basically a tip hotline. If the police open up a hotline to look for a suspect and get 10,000 reports, then they don't assume that anywhere close to 10,000 people saw that suspect in 10,000 different locations. They just assume a lot of people THINK they saw the suspect and reported it just to be safe. Then the police can go look into that tip and see if it was actually the suspect.
And the vast, vast majority of the time, the tip is wrong. But the tip line remains open, just in case.
Which is how VAERS works. It's a tip line. Just in case. But it's not telling you how many issues there are with the vaccine. It's telling you how many POSSIBLE issues there might have been based on reports, and those reports have not been verified when they show up in VAERS.
I am honestly not following how you’re reaching that conclusion.
The VAERS system is a tip line. It’s designed to look for small variances in the expected baseline of garbage reports that flood systems like this.
As I said, if the vaccine is 100% safe, you’d still expect VAERS to look exactly the same as it does now.
Just as if you post a tip line for a fake suspect. You’d still get thousands and thousands of reports.
You can draw absolutely no conclusion about the safety of the vaccine from VAERS for that reason. That’s not what VAERS is designed to do. It’s just giving researchers hints on where a problem MIGHT exist and warrants more digging. VAERS itself is incapable of telling you anything about the vaccine with any certainty.
It’s not that the VAERS system is lying or being used as propaganda. It’s just not designed for laypeople. It’s designed to assist researchers who then go to do further studies and investigations on specific areas suggested by the data. It’s open to laypeople, but is not curated for or designed for them to use.