The vaccine is a weapon of war.
Those who have to take it against their preference are casualties.
Brothers wounded in war get Purple Hearts.
They don’t get ostracized.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (56)
sorted by:
I am honestly not following how you’re reaching that conclusion.
The VAERS system is a tip line. It’s designed to look for small variances in the expected baseline of garbage reports that flood systems like this.
As I said, if the vaccine is 100% safe, you’d still expect VAERS to look exactly the same as it does now.
Just as if you post a tip line for a fake suspect. You’d still get thousands and thousands of reports.
You can draw absolutely no conclusion about the safety of the vaccine from VAERS for that reason. That’s not what VAERS is designed to do. It’s just giving researchers hints on where a problem MIGHT exist and warrants more digging. VAERS itself is incapable of telling you anything about the vaccine with any certainty.
It’s not that the VAERS system is lying or being used as propaganda. It’s just not designed for laypeople. It’s designed to assist researchers who then go to do further studies and investigations on specific areas suggested by the data. It’s open to laypeople, but is not curated for or designed for them to use.
I understand the confusion.
VAERS saying that under reporting is a problem is not a tacit admission that there are vaccine injuries going unreported.
It’s saying the following:
“This database is supposed to contain literally every medical issue that arises after a vaccine is administered. Every single one. Regardless of whether the vaccine caused it. However, we don’t get every report we want. The data we are looking for is underreported.”
VAERS is not specifically reporting on vaccine injury. It’s reporting on reports of medical issues that arose after a vaccine was administered. Those are two very different things.
In the case of VAERS, they want every cold that someone came down with. Every weird arm pain. Every case of AIDS. Every case of lightning strike. Every heart attack. Every stroke. Every case of a penis randomly falling off.
As long as it occurred after the vaccine.
That is what is being underreported. Not cases of vaccine injury, but cases of medical problems that occurred some time after the vaccine was administered.
Which is why they openly state that not a single case in VAERS is proven to be due to the vaccine. It just happened after the vaccine.
See the difference? Post hoc ergo propter hoc. Causation/correlation error. VAERS does not attempt whatsoever to avoid this. It simply presents correlation, and scientists then use VAERS correlation to see if they can establish causation. VAERS does not establish causation at all.
The doctors don’t have a choice in filing. If an injury occurs after the vaccine, they have to report it unless they can 100% rule out the vaccine. Like a gunshot.
I know how to draw conclusions from data, but you’re confusing data and reports of data.
If I sat in the hospital, checked every single patient myself, I’m collecting data.
If I’m getting reports, then I don’t have data. I have reports that MIGHT be data.
Which is an extra step for me as a researcher. I can’t draw definite conclusions from reports of data, only data.
VAERS offers reports, not data. If I want to turn those reports into data, then I have to investigate the reports. THAT is what VAERS is designed to do.
Which is why you can’t draw conclusions from VAERS. Because you can’t draw scientific conclusions from reports of data. Just data itself.