The point of publishing any study in the Lancet is for peer review...... a good number of the published studies have not stood up to scrutiny.....
Now the rest of the magazine is with editorial bias...... and publishes personal opines that may or may not be based on facts .....
But the Studies are written and presented based on scientific methodology and on the evidence presented by that study..... and if the study has not followed that methodology or has been selective in reporting results etc then it won’t be accepted as a ‘Peer Reviewed’ study.....
Yo, Lancet! Is this a real study this time??
The point of publishing any study in the Lancet is for peer review...... a good number of the published studies have not stood up to scrutiny.....
Now the rest of the magazine is with editorial bias...... and publishes personal opines that may or may not be based on facts .....
But the Studies are written and presented based on scientific methodology and on the evidence presented by that study..... and if the study has not followed that methodology or has been selective in reporting results etc then it won’t be accepted as a ‘Peer Reviewed’ study.....
WWG1WGA
Lol, which is why I made it clear in the title what the source was. It's a data point, right?
I hear ya