That’s a shit riposte and whataboutery at its lazy best.
He’s talking about the ‘proofs’ that this chap presented. What were your thoughts on their relative strength? You must disagree and believe them to be strong proofs of something for you to White Knight so readily
I am a nobody searching for truth. I like researching and reading/listening to other research. You must have all the answers, please let us in on the knowledge.
Actually deciphering Q posts would not be something I could do or attempt to do fearing I might add conjecture or mislead. I believe many Q post are misdirection and some are going to be actual events but I don't believe you can take a word or half a sentence from a Q post and call that a proof! Now calling No Names death 30 days exactly to the second is a real Q proof.
So what comms that they use have you deciphered? I’m down for differing opinions and research analysis
That’s a shit riposte and whataboutery at its lazy best.
He’s talking about the ‘proofs’ that this chap presented. What were your thoughts on their relative strength? You must disagree and believe them to be strong proofs of something for you to White Knight so readily
I am a nobody searching for truth. I like researching and reading/listening to other research. You must have all the answers, please let us in on the knowledge.
Actually deciphering Q posts would not be something I could do or attempt to do fearing I might add conjecture or mislead. I believe many Q post are misdirection and some are going to be actual events but I don't believe you can take a word or half a sentence from a Q post and call that a proof! Now calling No Names death 30 days exactly to the second is a real Q proof.