I posted this on TheDonald, but I don’t think anyone really saw it. I’m interested in hearing opinions on this.

Here’s my theory. Please poke holes in it as necessary.

Remember Pfizer “approving” a vaccine that wasn’t even available?

But licensed adult vaccines, including the new Comirnaty, do not enjoy any liability shield. Just as with Ford’s exploding Pinto, or Monsanto’s herbicide Roundup, people injured by the Comirnaty vaccine could potentially sue for damages.

And because adults injured by the vaccine will be able to show that the manufacturer knew of the problems with the product, jury awards could be astronomical.

Pfizer is therefore unlikely to allow any American to take a Comirnaty vaccine until it can somehow arrange immunity for this product.

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/mainstream-media-fda-approval-pfizer-vaccine/

They have immunity under the EUA. But what happens if and when the EUA no longer applies?

Enter the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act

NCVIA's purpose was to eliminate the potential financial liability of vaccine manufacturers due to vaccine injury claims to ensure a stable market supply of vaccines, and to provide cost-effective arbitration for vaccine injury claims.

Under the NCVIA, the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (NVICP) was created to provide a federal no-fault system for compensating vaccine-related injuries or death by establishing a claim procedure involving the United States Court of Federal Claims and special masters.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Childhood_Vaccine_Injury_Act

If a vaccine is included in the childhood schedule, they remain immune from liability.

Even though children don’t get COVID, and maybe five kids have died from it, they are pushing these on children for legal reasons to avoid lawsuits.

This is evil.