I understand your reply to my comment, but do you really understand it? maybe get the person that sent it to you to come out in public and make those statements, possibly bring proof of them. until then, isnt it hearsay and more than likely bullshit, especially how it can be shredded by almost anyone that looks at it? or is this an attempt to get the community to start believing in frankfurt raid stories again?
The one thing I hate about this community is how some of you see conspiracies in EVERYTHING. That makes this place look like nut jobs. I posted something that i received from a direct source. It wasn't a post i saw somewhere. I got some good answers so I deleted my post and yet you still commented to accuse me of some conspiracy.
who is your direct source? we should not doubt it and criticize it why exactly? please tell me. with out casting about dispersions on my or anyone elses character please.
I was on a group text discussing the Newsom situation with some friends. FWIW my opinion is he's probably totally fine and will pop up like nothing happened which is what I told them. Then she caught up with our thread and told us about her phone call. I am the only one of us following this site so I decided to see if there was any validity to what she was told. So I posted. I will not dox her to validate anything to you. I never said not to doubt but I think your brand of criticism is not useful or productive. I did not make any definitive statements or even attempt to say anything close to "trust me guys and my source." If I was trying to spread disinformation wouldn't I leave the post up? I had already deleted it before I got your comment.
think what you want, been here a while, seen lots of people come here to post nonsense to make the board look bad, including mods, so pointed it out. sorry you cannot take criticism real well. maybe you can head back to reddit and be more comfortable there.
I understand your reply to my comment, but do you really understand it? maybe get the person that sent it to you to come out in public and make those statements, possibly bring proof of them. until then, isnt it hearsay and more than likely bullshit, especially how it can be shredded by almost anyone that looks at it? or is this an attempt to get the community to start believing in frankfurt raid stories again?
The one thing I hate about this community is how some of you see conspiracies in EVERYTHING. That makes this place look like nut jobs. I posted something that i received from a direct source. It wasn't a post i saw somewhere. I got some good answers so I deleted my post and yet you still commented to accuse me of some conspiracy.
who is your direct source? we should not doubt it and criticize it why exactly? please tell me. with out casting about dispersions on my or anyone elses character please.
I was on a group text discussing the Newsom situation with some friends. FWIW my opinion is he's probably totally fine and will pop up like nothing happened which is what I told them. Then she caught up with our thread and told us about her phone call. I am the only one of us following this site so I decided to see if there was any validity to what she was told. So I posted. I will not dox her to validate anything to you. I never said not to doubt but I think your brand of criticism is not useful or productive. I did not make any definitive statements or even attempt to say anything close to "trust me guys and my source." If I was trying to spread disinformation wouldn't I leave the post up? I had already deleted it before I got your comment.
think what you want, been here a while, seen lots of people come here to post nonsense to make the board look bad, including mods, so pointed it out. sorry you cannot take criticism real well. maybe you can head back to reddit and be more comfortable there.