This one gets it. What I find so utterly difficult to comprehend is how anyone can fall for the most fallacious of fallacies and confuse part for the whole. Some dogs are poodles, therefore, all dogs are poodles. That's the same type of reasoning that leads to "Some Jews are among the worst of humanity, therefore all Jews are the worst of humanity." I think anyone interested in justice doesn't believe in guilt by ethnicity.
This one gets it. What I find so utterly difficult to comprehend is how anyone can fall for the most fallacious of fallacies and confuse part for the whole. Some dogs are poodles, therefore, all dogs are poodles. That's the same type of reasoning that leads to "Some Jews are among the worst of humanity, therefore all Jews are the worst of humanity." I think anyone interested in justice doesn't believe in guilt by ethnicity.