Since it's just a movie, and we know vehicles can be run on hydrogen. Hydrogen tech was killed, literally. It would've killed the fossil fuels industry. That's a lot of jobs and businesses, but it would be good for humanity if things ran on tap water. Since that would be a very hard transition, that ultimately should be done. Are they using Biden's admin to kill fossil so we can go to hydrogen?
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (12)
sorted by:
It seems carbon emissions of the entire existence of man would be just a tiny blip compared to the annual volcanic emissions..
Stan Meyer had the hydrogen happening at the cylinder. No storage needed. That was in the 70s I think. Imagine what we could do today!
Most cars would be driving with 5ksi or 10ksi pressurized H2 not liquid H2, if I remember.
But I agree probably better to shift to a CNG type system for cars. Or with H2, I’ve heard of concept of ammonia NH3 as the carrier which is much less pressure to store, similar to propane basically. And could be produced with renewables and nuclear with Haber Bosch processes.
Definitely I don’t like electrical EVs lots of problems I see with those.
True nobody thinks about this but if your house is made of carbon (wood) then the carbon is trapped. If plants are alive (living wood) then the carbon is trapped. I will agree insofar as saying the car industry as a whole is extremely inefficient in terms of fuel, road upkeep, and personal expense upkeeping your own car, and I do like the idea of public/more efficient travel... but the trade is freedom of movement I can see that now that they want to take that away.