[Tulsi Gabbard] The prosecutor in the Rittenhouse trial clearly didn’t do due diligence before making the decision to prosecute. This tragedy never would have happened if the government carried out its responsibilities to protect the safety, lives and property of innocent people. - The Great Awakening

476

[Tulsi Gabbard] The prosecutor in the Rittenhouse trial clearly didn’t do due diligence before making the decision to prosecute. This tragedy never would have happened if the government carried out its responsibilities to protect the safety, lives and property of innocent people. (twitter.com)

posted 3 years ago by Tefren 3 years ago by Tefren +476 / -0

75 comments

75 comments share save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (75)

sorted by:

▲ 34 ▼

– deleted 34 points 3 years ago +34 / -0

▲ 4 ▼

– Questionable 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0

Remember that time Trump walked into North Korea? One can not lead without talking with those you disagree with. One must engage on the actual terrain, and not by ignoring it.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 2 ▼

– deleted 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

▲ 1 ▼

– Questionable 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Right. Because we all tip our hands to the other players at the table, because this game is being played in good faith by all parties.

Food for thought:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FdAF7Gn58kA

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-supporters-favorite-democrat-tulsi-gabbard-works-with-gop-and-plots-next-move/ar-BB1cgClC

permalink parent save report block reply

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q