i've been watching most of day 4 so far.
if anyone has been watching the trial since before day 4, would you tell me why the 'evidence' i.e. detective interviews are HEAVILY redacted?
what is there to redact, if it is supposed to be incriminating to the accused?
Ok if he wasn’t cornered if they were chasing him for what 5 to 10 minutes straight and he was exhausted and couldn’t run anymore and had to defend what do you call that? Maybe not literally cornered but cornered because he couldn’t run anymore. The guy was proven to not have robbed anything and did exactly what previous visitors did before him. The fact that you think three people with guns chasing you down in a vehicle is ok shows the problem with you and your general knowledge of self defense. They chased him down and attacked him with weapons of course he was going to defend himself. Would you have done the same if three black people were chasing you down telling. You to stop for absolutely no reason other than a guess?