Liberals are standing up for child rapist Joseph Rosenbaum. SAD!
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (15)
sorted by:
I ve tried really hard to not get in this frame of thought, but I can’t help noticing it more and more. What’s up with the Joos and destroying shit? Considering the statements recently made by Pfizer’s CEO, the fact that the other pharma ceos, YouTube, google, Bidans cabinet, Epstein, the guy in this Twitter post defending Rosenbaum (no need to point out the connection). My brain hurts, I don’t want to get stuck in this loop, but the more I pay attention the more I notice a common theme.
Fact checkers get destroyed by the early life checkers every time, there is not even a contest.
And to address your question, I think their in-group preference overrides all other factors. Hence why they unfailingly back child rapists, murderers, terrorists, thieves, killers and all sorts of other malign entity as long as that common tribal influence is known.
Over time, refusal to weed out cancerous elements leads to these utterly dominating as an archetype.
I'm convinced that if Trump had not called them fake news, a term that took off like wildfire, there would be no fact checkers. Hence trying to fabricate a aura of legitimacy around the rotting corpse of the fake news, by some 3rd party 'fact checker' that inevitably is either still fake news, or is owned by people with a vested interest in hiding the truth. Like big pharma funding the pharma fact checkers.
Trying to keep the swindle going..
Here is Trump saying that our American Congress was owned by Jews which was as it should be and lamenting that Jews supposedly have less influence over our Congress today. Weird.
https://mobile.twitter.com/CostcoAlbania/status/1455000382913007617