In 2010 when i was aware of social credit amd facial recognition technology and observed our inescapable wifi and video feed dungeon, i was a "kook" and "blerha blerg CoNsPiRaCy."
Then Snowden. Now instead of "blerha blerg CoNsPiRaCy" it's "everybody knows that, so what?"
All of his running and hiding and headlines and data and all he did was change the normy mind from "they aren't listening" to "ssssshh, they're listening." Objective of the operation.
Contrast w Bradley Manning. He exposed war crimes for which a Durham-style series of indictments would have ended the war and hung th Bush administration.
One they tortured and turned into a girl. The other one is played by J Gordon Levitt in a popular and hyped movie.
Im sure it's a violation of international law to park and then machine gun ambulance personnel and journalists. A better question would be how this footage did anything to the soldiers there.
I was just ignoring you though because youre an obvious retard who went hook line and sinker when the cabal broadcasting sold it with homophobia and you got hard
Pede, I can't help you.
You're doubling down with someone that has first hand knowledge, including the classified stuff that still isn't public and I know you've never heard or seen. I still have a piece of shrapnel from that same area of Baghdad. I keep it as a reminder that Iraqis used kids as human shields, and you can't trust anyone outside your family. We gave candy and water, we got RPGs and 7.62x39 in return.
I still talk to my brothers that survived VBIEDs that hit their convoys in 2010 because the videos were used to create new martyrs. I still go to memorial services for friends that were killed because some Afghani asshole decided to blow himself up at Bagram for retribution in 2013.
All I can say is you might want to discount those left-wing commie sources and recalibrate what you think you know. What you're saying is not the truth. Manning is a traitor and needs to swing from a rope.
So your refutation is that gunning down journalists and medics isn't a war crime bc you have war artefacts from war zones?
I will have shields of vaccinated kids 3 rows deep when it gets hot here so that other points a non point to me
No. The war crime is intentionally targeting civilians. The Apaches went in there to protect a disabled HMMWV from SAF and RPGs. They saw armed men run into that building that were firing. When they lit up the aggressors, they had no way of knowing the Bongo that pulled up were attempting to evac civilians, nor did they know anyone was a "journalist".
No intentional targeting, no crime. It's what happens in war. We do our best to avoid civilian casualties, but they do happen.
Now do the Battle of Samarra and read up on taking back the Great Mosque.
I don't remember a building involved at all in th vid i saw. It was an ambulance destroyed in the road or other vehicle and waves of killing civilian responders.
Keep apologizing for cabal war crimes. Double down by invoking old world retard religious rivalries.