Oops. Their Covid narrative got peer reviewed in The Lancet (now officially printed on toilet paper to save time). "Why is this SO important? The 1905 SCOTUS case Jacobson v Mass. held that mandates can only be considered to “prevent the spread of contagious disease.” And now, OOPS, they DON'T
(media.greatawakening.win)
⚠️ Vax-tarded ☠️
Well until you can explain away the loss of smell and taste novelty of the SARS-COV-2 virus, then no normie is going to listen to you when you say the virus hasn't been isolated (even though you're right it has not)
And you can properly find a million different reasons for that, that is alot more plausible then a new "virus"
There is only two truths. SARS-COV-2 exist or SARS-COV-2 dont exist.
How do we find out which statement is true? We need evidence? Do we got any empiric evidence that SARS-COV-2 exist?
No because its never been purified/isolated.
Ergo SARS-COV-2 dont exist. Its really simple actually,
But that's the problem. Normies and libtards don't think too deeply so they won't heed to that type of logic based thinking.
I don't have any explanation for the loss of smell and taste element myself. Although I've heard some fringe stuff about 5g