I'm not looking for myself, I'm looking to convince a few people I know. If any of you have anything in mind, something that I can actually show others, I'd be most grateful. Thanks!
Edit: I know that this has been asked many times but I haven't yet found anything that I can show others that is not solely based on surmise. When asked how I can put forward that "it had to be this way", I find myself lacking in solid arguments to explain - I suppose it's because I'm yet unfamiliar with all that happened between November the 3rd and Jan 20th (I'm thinking about the new people appointed to office, EOs, etc). Patel Patriot's devolution series is great, but it's still all suppositions.
Edit 2: Thanks to all that suggested links. I've just found an excellent summary of Devolution on the internet. I'll start by looking carefully into the EO mentioned below.
""I can only tell you what I believe is going on in the simplest of terms: Devolution is a constitutional mechanism to maintain a functioning government in the event of an occupation or infiltration. The powers of the Commander in Chief are devolved into the duties of 11 Combat Commanders.
Additionally, there are several Executive Orders (some Trump signed others by previous presidents) that deal with Continuity of Govt.
It is a fact that Trump signed EOs relating to continuity of govt (EO13961) under various states of emergency.
Together, Devolution and/or Continuity of Government have been in play to box the current resident and keep the National Essential Functions in place.""
Thanks. I've read the series by Patel Patriot, I agree that it's great. I just feel it's not something I can show others, if you see what I mean. People tell me that things are going awry but that the fact that I keep claiming that it had to be this way does not make sense. So, I'm trying to find information that I can explain things in a clear factual but gradual way to others.
Honestly if you can find someone willing to read Parts 1 through 4 of the Devolution Series, and still think that what we're seeing with Biden is normal, they're delusional and probably aethist.
The reason I bring up aethist is their concept of moral right and wrong is subjective. Telling an aethist that a satanist is running the show has the same weight as saying a christian is in charge. There's no association between good and evil.
These people are spiritually lost and will be incapable of SEEING the truth. You cannot show/lead/uncover anything to them that will stick. What they seek is a spiritual connection to God that they've already closed themselves off from.
Good luck with that.
Well, you've got a point there: most people I talk to are atheists.
If it makes you feel any better, when I started down this rabbit hole, I was more leaning to the buddhist/occult path to enlightenment myself.
Through research of current events, learning about the freemasons and what they've been doing this whole time, lead me towards Jesus Christ. Now I'm absolutely a Christian because it's the only worldview that actually makes sense.