Next in the news, the parlamentarian said no, so it gets stripped out.
When the real boss says no, she means it.
Then some obama/clinton/biden judge files an injuction saying it's illegal to attach it.
etc etc.
Just unleash .mil on them already, lol, lets goooooo.
Right. So he didn't prepare for the rain. Someone else's resources went to purchase, transport, and setup an Ez-Up for rain cover.
It was in the home-teams cheering section for family, this guy was from the other school, sitting in the wrong cheering section, but was entitled to sit under their rain cover it seems.
Then starts a fight and stabs him when pressed to leave.
The left needs another "that stupid lady with the car that got shot by ice, and what's-his-name or whatever who got lit-up by the ICE agents interfereing"
I can't even remember their names so the left didn't get enough milage out of them, They need some fresh names before the mid terms so this is an escalation to get ICE to overreact and add a few more dumbasses to their list of self-inflicted matyrs.
The left has built up so much hatred for the right, they are unable to admit they are wrong in their version of reality.
The concept that the right was correct this whole time, it breaks them. They short circuit, reboot, and go back to repeating their rhetoric.
Its visible in their eyes, If caught in a logic loop they reboot. Usually followed by shaking their head, and either walking away silently, or just disengaging from the discussion claiming assault.
Ties directly into this article here:
https://www.zerohedge.com/ai/how-deep-state-weaponizes-ai-control-narrative
And this is a great graphic included if you just want a picture:
https://cms.zerohedge.com/s3/files/inline-images/HJKrGVlasAAk8Gh.jpg?itok=1TB_zKd7
I'm always skeptical when comments get a lot of heat. Usually when I see the source article link to the actual speech I can listen/watch for myself.
A LOT of these articles aren't giving links to the actual comment so here's the short section of the speech I found, with the follow up statement just afterwards:
https://youtu.be/2A_g23O5zwc?si=kyb0EHVU1-w2vu9S&t=325
He actually clarifies "miracles of science" in the very next comment. We can't just take his one sentence and spin it. That is exactly where the "fine people on both sides" Trump mis-quote comes from.
Elon specifically points out he was using it to refer to miracles of science. We all know Jesus is known for miracles, so to use that as a reference, I don't see that as a negative here.
His comment infers he believes Jesus performed miracles and the clarification that the tech is a miracle of science. There's a differentiation there I think is important.
The entire speech is very eye opening as a whole where AI safety comes up. Personal robots, self driving cars, and the host brings up terminator. Notice here Elon basically says he hopes not. but admits well we hope not.
I'd be more concerned with that comment versus references to Jesus. Perhaps the goal here is to focus on the Jesus comment in the speech and not the dangers of AI that are being baked into the foundation of the sciences.
If the tech lets us see, someone can hack it and alter what we see (like Ghost in the shell)
If a tech lets us walk, then can police deactivate it to stop a suspect from fleeing?
With self driving cars, surely there will be a police override or some kind of kill switch to disable or take over the vehicle remotely.
Even better is that IF THEY VOTE, through the retention laws of voter records, they can get the voter rolls for people who voted.
Voting as an illegal = fraud = fast track to deportation.
It's checkmate either way for Democrats.
I have 2 guesses:
He's clean(ish) and just a royal level douche bag who genuinely hates America. Nothing they have would remove him from office per se, they can still vote from jail.
OR
He's got enough collatoral dirt on "the people cooperating" that hes using that to shield himself. If he goes down, so does the majority of the dirty bastards who are cooperating. - Don't light off the shitbomb when you're stuck in the room with it, kind of situation.
So I mean, wouldn't that mean either they should be wearing full burkas then?
Wait isn't it against Islam for them to work? Did they drive to work?
They're in public without their chaperon/ or a male escorting them.
Picking and chosing which rules to follow maybe, I dunno.
The timing of how long Cole was in the room while the K9 officer was standing at the door looking inside makes this look like an inside job.
The second the K9 officer turns from the door and for Cole to come SPRINTING out already with shotgun in hand, makes it appear the K9 officer was observing him pulling out his shotgun and bracing for his sprint.
That guy needs to be questioned/investigated as a co-conspirator for sure.
Like the scene from the Original Judge Dredd
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v9rMaMEpC2E
"...out the window?!, that would have been suicide."
"Maybe, but it would have been legal."
Great movies.
For just brutal action also check out:
Sisu (didn't know what to expect, wasn't disappointed at all)
Sisu: Road to Revenge (I think this one has the best boss kill ever)
Inglorious Bastards (gets an honorable mention in this space)
RAMBO (that .50 cal though)
So what I did was I have my carrying Bible and I have a good audio version.
https://www.amazon.com/dp/1444786407
I watched him read the Gospel of Mark on youtube and enjoyed his voice, so I picked up the CD set of him reading the whole thing.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JjOgcMQXvSc
Sometimes I curl up with a coffee and snuggle one of my cats while I read a bit, sometimes I'll sit at my PC and listen to the audio if I'm having trouble getting through a section. I been listening to it Sunday mornings and enjoying randomly picking sections to listen to and finding the relevance in what I'm dealing with that day/week.
Is this where USPS receives it, but post marks it after June 24th so they don't get there "on time"?