I don't think we should be more suspicious of this guy than anyone else. Top me, me seems like an unbiased normie scientist who is intrigued by the study he's commenting on, but since it's just one study, it still needs to be replicated and validated or invalidated by further research. This is how uncorrupted science is supposed to work. Also, some people are naturally more or less dramatic than others. I think he's very concerned about this study because of the implications (cancers, etc), but it's not solid enough evidence to lose his cool over. This was like Robert Malone in the beginning, who just was raising doubts and asking questions, but now he's a full-time warrior against the vaccine.
I don't think we should be more suspicious of this guy than anyone else. Top me, me seems like an unbiased normie scientist who is intrigued by the study he's commenting on, but since it's just one study, it still needs to be replicated and validated or invalidated by further research. This is how uncorrupted science is supposed to work. Also, some people are naturally more or less dramatic than others. I think he's very concerned about this study because of the implications (cancers, etc), but it's not solid enough evidence to lose his cool over. This was like Robert Malone in the beginning, who just was raising doubts and asking questions, but now he's a full-time warrior against the vaccine.