The jet may or may not have crashed. The elite communicate (comms) openly in plain sight on public forums such as mass media, social media, and art. The communication is thinly vailed and some of our time here is spent trying to decode these communications in order to understand their plans and sometimes prevent the plans from being successful. Welcome to the information war fren.
The plane did crash and it was arranged by the cabal because creating an elaborate conspiracy to slam a $200 million dollar fighter plane into the ocean that at the very minimum would have required the active cooperation of large members of the UK defence forces because this was the best way to inform each other that Queen Elizabeth II had died. These people are the wealthiest and most powerful people in the world who have had experience lurking in the shadows for millennia and can control governments, the weather and create earthquakes but the best way to let each other know the latest news is not to use their well established network of agents or encrypted communications but fake plane crashes.
The plane didn't crash and it was an even more elaborate operation to create the appearance of a crash that could potentially be disproved later because the crash never occurred and the British military would be surplus one active operational fighter jet. This even harder to mount scenario was preferable to sending each other encrypted communications despite all their wealth, power, advanced technology and experience in clandestine operations.
A fighter jet based on an aircraft carrier named after Queen Elizabeth I crashed and had nothing to do with the supposed death of Queen Elizabeth II who has subsequently made a public appearance.
You still haven't answered the basic question I asked before: Why go to all that trouble to communicate with each other when surely simpler, more secure and less revealing methods must surely be available to them?
Your reply about comms told me the "what" when I already know basically what comms are and I was asking for help with the "why". If that's the best support I can get from this community then surely I will need "luck" to understand.
If you want to "help" all you have to do is answer the basic question that I've asked twice now:
"Why go to all that trouble to communicate with each other when simpler, more secure and less revealing methods must surely be available to them?"
The jet may or may not have crashed. The elite communicate (comms) openly in plain sight on public forums such as mass media, social media, and art. The communication is thinly vailed and some of our time here is spent trying to decode these communications in order to understand their plans and sometimes prevent the plans from being successful. Welcome to the information war fren.
So the scenarios are:
The plane did crash and it was arranged by the cabal because creating an elaborate conspiracy to slam a $200 million dollar fighter plane into the ocean that at the very minimum would have required the active cooperation of large members of the UK defence forces because this was the best way to inform each other that Queen Elizabeth II had died. These people are the wealthiest and most powerful people in the world who have had experience lurking in the shadows for millennia and can control governments, the weather and create earthquakes but the best way to let each other know the latest news is not to use their well established network of agents or encrypted communications but fake plane crashes.
The plane didn't crash and it was an even more elaborate operation to create the appearance of a crash that could potentially be disproved later because the crash never occurred and the British military would be surplus one active operational fighter jet. This even harder to mount scenario was preferable to sending each other encrypted communications despite all their wealth, power, advanced technology and experience in clandestine operations.
A fighter jet based on an aircraft carrier named after Queen Elizabeth I crashed and had nothing to do with the supposed death of Queen Elizabeth II who has subsequently made a public appearance.
You still haven't answered the basic question I asked before: Why go to all that trouble to communicate with each other when surely simpler, more secure and less revealing methods must surely be available to them?
I'm really struggling to understand "comms".
I tried to help. Good luck.
Your reply about comms told me the "what" when I already know basically what comms are and I was asking for help with the "why". If that's the best support I can get from this community then surely I will need "luck" to understand.
If you want to "help" all you have to do is answer the basic question that I've asked twice now:
"Why go to all that trouble to communicate with each other when simpler, more secure and less revealing methods must surely be available to them?"
Ask them. And I no longer wish to help you.