*Below is a comment from the AnonymousConservative daily news briefing from a few weeks ago. I highly recommend reading it. It totally changed how I am viewing this whole situation..

Quote:*

I briefly studied the “Law of Armed Combat” and one of the things that sticks with me still was the instructor explaining (but not giving the exact numbers) that JAG has specific equations for what is an acceptable number of civilian casualties given the value of a target, need for immediate action, potential damage of not moving on the target, etc. It’s understandable to not leave it to individual snap judgments, but it is also a callously utilitarian calculus.

Which is to say two things:

1. If there are “white hats” and a “plan”, if the primary target is high value enough (prevent a totalitarian dictatorship of the whole world, say) the number of acceptable civilian casualties could be very, very high. Like, “getting close to but not reaching extinction” levels of high. If, for an example, the “this not a game” being played is 7 billion people living under satanic, baby raping slavery conditions in an inescapable techno-hell (or accepting the loss of 6.9 billion, who would at least have a chance at salvation by dying, so that the other 100 million can live free and build anew free of the Cabal, the “white hats’” equation may favor the loss of 6.9. In practice it wouldn’t much look like there were any white hats, and you’d be left taking their word for it that things would have been much worse had they not allowed those billions of deaths, and having to swallow (or reject) the “they had to die to be saved” message.

In such a scenario the “white hats” could both be correct that they took the right course of action and still be executed by the survivors for their tacit approval of billions of deaths- because how could survivors possibly believe that mass casualty was the best possible route?

2. If there are not white hats or they failed, no one is coming to save you. If there are white hats and a plan is still going, if you aren’t yourself a critical part of that plan, no one else is going to assure that you aren’t part of the “acceptable” collateral damage. Your plans A, B, and C will probably be similar in either case and should already be in place, and if they aren’t, get going now.