Pfizer would accept that in a heartbeat. They’ve already made their money. They really don’t care if it’s used because their customers are governments, not people. And those countries gleefully waived any and all rights to protect their citizenry in their contracts with Pfizer(yeah yeah, fraud and legalities etc).
What Pfizer cares about right now is indemnity and immunity from prosecution.
Um, there is law that requires individuals to report suspected adverse drug reactions and is usually mandatory training as condition of employment. That’s about as far as I know on the subject though. If clinical teams knowingly falsify data or hide unethical practices during a clinical trial there’s surely some immunity issues there I would think. You’d have to sit and dif into 21 CFR and the associated enforcement portions of USC
Pfizer would accept that in a heartbeat. They’ve already made their money. They really don’t care if it’s used because their customers are governments, not people. And those countries gleefully waived any and all rights to protect their citizenry in their contracts with Pfizer(yeah yeah, fraud and legalities etc). What Pfizer cares about right now is indemnity and immunity from prosecution.
The companies have immunity but what about the employees of those companies? Is there anything preventing a civil lawsuit?
Um, there is law that requires individuals to report suspected adverse drug reactions and is usually mandatory training as condition of employment. That’s about as far as I know on the subject though. If clinical teams knowingly falsify data or hide unethical practices during a clinical trial there’s surely some immunity issues there I would think. You’d have to sit and dif into 21 CFR and the associated enforcement portions of USC