345 The Supreme Court has unequivocally stated that a “forcible injection… into a nonconsenting person’s body represents a substantial interference with that person’s liberty[.]” Washington v. Harper, 494 U.S. 210, 229 (1990)......How many politicians and doctors and assistances are complicit? (twitter.com) posted 3 years ago by purkiss80 3 years ago by purkiss80 +345 / -0 15 comments share 15 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Would this encompass coercion, extortion or undisclosed risk under the legal terms?