The only issue I have with this sort of article is there are no figures to check their assertions. Also need to compare deaths/100000 for both vaxxed and unvaxxed groups to see if the rate difference is real, or simply as a result of having more vaxxed than unvaxxed people.
For example, if 90% of population was vaxxed and we assume both vaxxed and unvaxxed had same death rate, there would naturally be 9x as many vaxxed dying as unvaxxed. But both groups would have same deaths per 100000 ratio.
The only issue I have with this sort of article is there are no figures to check their assertions. Also need to compare deaths/100000 for both vaxxed and unvaxxed groups to see if the rate difference is real, or simply as a result of having more vaxxed than unvaxxed people.
For example, if 90% of population was vaxxed and we assume both vaxxed and unvaxxed had same death rate, there would naturally be 9x as many vaxxed dying as unvaxxed. But both groups would have same deaths per 100000 ratio.
You can not produce numbers that do do exist...
...no one is keeping an honest data set on what is the reality of the situation....