Video of Analysis of "Patterns of Deployment of Toxic Covid Batches" (Toxic Batches Appear to be Systematically Released)
(www.bitchute.com)
🤢 These people are sick! 🤮
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (75)
sorted by:
Programmer here ---
I downloaded the VAERS data and started to write some code to replicate the results.
There's one BIG assumption being made here, which is that 'all batches are the same size'. We have no confirmation of that.
You could see the exact same 'anomalies' with a consistently 'moderate toxic' formula and differing batch sizes.
Extremely small batches would have almost no adverse effects, and large batches would have many adverse effects - with no difference in toxicity.
The Pfizer 'ramp down' could be a gradual lowering of batch sizes (interspersed with minuscule batches).
I am not trying to say the vaxxes are ok -- in fact I actually suggested this kind of 'toxicity tweaking' as a theory about a month ago.
I'm just saying that without knowing the batch sizes, this is not a smoking gun.
Here's the previous theory -- do they line up?
If they give SALINE to almost everyone (the first time around), they still get ALL of their EVIL BENEFITS. Here's how...
https://greatawakening.win/p/13zgXB5572/if-they-give-saline-to-almost-ev/
True about the importance of the batch size - But I imagine there are process control standards. The other interesting pattern in the analysis is each vaccine company is clumped timewise so what would account for that?
Even with process control standards, a lot of 'partial batches' were discarded due to improper storage or expiration. I have no idea if this explains any of the variance.
With regard to the two separate time windows, it could be that each company was 'tweaking' it's batch sizes during those windows - but not the formula/toxicity.
Again, I am NOT an apologist for the Vax companies. See my earlier post (above) for proof of my 'skepticism'.
Let us know if your program can replicate the results of presentation. I think it would be worth doing… Also in the presentation it was hard to see what the actual timeline was date wise. I am curious If the second J&J cluster coincides with the April 13 pause that Trump put out a communication about. At the time I felt this pause was meaningful.
Trump Statement
APRIL 13, 2021 PALM BEACH, FL Statement by Donald J. Trump, 45th President of the United States of America. The Biden Administration did a terrible disservice to people throughout the world by allowing the FDA and CDC to call a “pause” in the use of the Johnson & Johnson COVID-19 vaccine. The results of this vaccine have been extraordinary but now it’s reputation will be permanently challenged. The people who have already taken the vaccine will be up in arms, and perhaps all of this was done for politics or perhaps it’s the FDA’s love for Pfizer. The FDA, especially with long time bureaucrats within, has to be controlled. They should not be able to do such damage for possibly political reasons, or maybe because their friends at Pfizer have suggested it. They’ll do things like this to make themselves look important. Remember, it was the FDA working with Pfizer, who announced the vaccine approval two days after the 2020 Presidential Election. They didn’t like me very much because I pushed them extremely hard. But if I didn’t, you wouldn’t have a vaccine for 3-5 years, or maybe not at all. It takes them years to act! Do your testing, clean up the record, and get the Johnson & Johnson vaccine back online quickly. The only way we defeat the China Virus is with our great vaccines!
The first J&J cluster started roughly 1/15/21, and the second roughly 5/22/21
If you speculate they may be tweaking batch size, what would be the motivation?
Why would batch size be a factor in their plan?
I rather can see a motivation for tweaking amount of ingredient x (99.9% tolerate ) as the vaccine was rushed and they didn’t have everything perfectly ready. Here is what I see From Canadian point of view - given that the source code for OpenVerify has eight doses and same with EU cards and given that PM ordered about 8 doses per person until 2025 - there is an optimal amount of doses they need. Is it because that is what is required for cumulative amount of ingredient X ? I am also going down this path since microscopic analysis from various source is also showing that there are “ingredients” present that should not be there.
To clarify, I'm not saying they are intentionally tweaking the batch size. (I assume batch sizes can change for all sorts of good or bad reasons.) I was only saying that variations in batch size could account for everything we're seeing here. (And I say that as someone who wants to find a smoking gun.)
See my earlier post for my take on intentional 'tweaking':
https://greatawakening.win/p/13zgXB5572/if-they-give-saline-to-almost-ev/