They want you to focus on Kyle Rittenhouse and what happened in Waukesha, because both stem on racism. They need you to pick a side and pick eachother apart like roosters in a hen house, while the farmer grinds his blade for you and your children's necks.
The CDC approved the dangerous COVID vaccines for over 50 million children ages 5-11 to get mandatory vaccines. Which will fully destroy their natural immune systems to only fight one specific virus and NOTHING ELSE. Not to mention injury complications and death.
We should be sharpening our blades against the kings in the ivory castle, and not against each other. This is the most important time in American history, and we're butting heads over.... race and ethnicity? Grow up. Grow up for your kids, they're looking at you for protection and all you can do is chug beer and complain about Kyle Rittenhouse and or a Black Man running people over in his truck.
This is all sophisticated manipulation, and if you don't prepare now, you're going to lose.
The difference between you and me is I didn't pull the conspiracy theorist card when I disagreed with people claiming that Kyle is fake (nice assumption on what I think of Kyle though (based on literally nothing I might add)).
And the likelihood for the flat Earth is 0, similar to the likelihood of the vaccine being safe and effective being 0. They've both been confirmed to be false time and time again. People always like to bring up the "there should be a discussion instead of shutting it down" argument. The problem is that the discussion has already been had. Flat Earth lost. Many times. Rehashing the discussion will never change that.
That's in contrast to Kyle being a fake, false flag, actor, whatever which is somewhat possible however unlikely.
So effectively one has a possibility of being true while the other doesn't. Possible vs impossible. Hence, "infinitely higher chance".
Lol I see what you're saying. All I was saying though is that it's impossible to quantify a relative proportionality of the likelihoods of each. The only way one could assign the likelihood of flat earth being a thing as 0%, is if we operate on the assumption that either a) you're omnipotent, or B) You've physically ventured out into space to verify the claim for yourself.
But this has digressed into a pointless silly argument at this point since I've already made it clear that I've not yet come across a working model for flat earth that adequately explains seasons in tandem with lunar cycles and thus I cannot advocate the flat earth theory as being legitimate.
In short, you don't need to convince me flat earth isn't a thing since I'm already unconvinced.
Fair enough, however you do seem to be convinced that the only two ways to place its likelihood at 0% are to go to space or be Omnipotent. I disagree with this as well. There's plenty of experiments you can do on Earth that prove the Earth is round and couldn't be flat.
Regardless though, I have been wondering what the flat Earth explanation is for the sun setting in different places. One thing I've noticed recently when watching the sun go down is that, as opposed to several months ago where it sets straight down the road, the sun now sets off to the side somewhat. I'm not looking to be convinced (and while I understand that you aren't convinced yourself I figured I'd ask in case you'd come across an explanation for this since you seem to have done more research than I have) but I suppose simply through a desire to understand the opposing argument I was wondering if there's any explanation for that, or if that may be another thing that you haven't really found an explanation for?
Ah yes! That reminds me of the third aspect of the working model I have yet to come across that would allow me to make the jump to being a full on believer.
Initially I only remembered two of the elements of a comprehensive model that I've yet to come by : a) An explanation for changing seasons at respective regions of the planet, and B) An explanation for the phases of the moon and why they seem to wax and wane on a consistent 2x cycles per 30 day schedule and can be predicted accurately based on this
The third element that was eluding me was very relevant to what you just mentioned! C) How on earth (no pun intended) can a flat earth diagram explain the fact that one half of the earth is daylight for half the day while the other half of the earth is in darkness and vice versa.
I've taken a few astronomy courses in college to fulfill my common curriculum credits and so I learned a ton about the modern day scientific explanations for all of these things as well as had a solid amount of practice in applying the mathematical formulas for calculating things such as angle of incidence of the sun to a specific region on earth, or calculating the amount of Astronomic units (or whatever AU stands for lol) between a given planet, during a specific point in its revolution, and the sun. And many other trigonometric calculations I can't quite remember off the top of my head.
Point being, I remember vividly that all those calculations checked out mathematically and seemed to verify conclusively that our scientific models of the sun and planetary motions are indeed verifiable beyond a reasonable doubt.
So trust me lol. I am aware of how much of a leap it would be to toss out all of that and opt for a currently unsubstantiated flat earth paradigm lol.
The thing is though that all of this makes sense under the assumption that we've compiled all the information about our current astronomical working models that will ever be available in existence.
Of course this cannot be true in a timeline of infinity. And so the possibility that new evidence will one day come forward to allow for a flat earth conception of the universe, although small, must exist.