You come across as a massive fool who seems to be in denial raging in replies to multiple people who are pointing out that there isn't a single shred of evidence that this movie exists. You frankly come across as deranged. Fervently claiming to block anyone who disagrees with you and calling them all "glowies". You probably don't even know what a fucking glowie is based on the way you're applying it.

But look, I get it. My first response when someone tells me I'm misremembering something is some variation of "Fuck you I am. You think I can't remember what happened to me in my own life?". One example is when I fell and busted my head on something and passed out bleeding. Some parts of that story are agreed upon, I got carried up the stairs and became conscious again, I was bleeding, I hit my head on something, I got a tiny little scar sort of hidden under my eyebrow. Other things however are less clear, how I fell, what I hit my head on, what the other person with me was doing before and when it happened. What I do know however is that regardless of whose memory says what, I absolutely have a small scar on my head which proves conclusively that it happened. This movie has no such proof in any capacity. It doesn't exist. And there's nothing wrong with admitting you made a mistake and misremembered something. In the end, we should all come to the conclusion that's supported by evidence, not what we think is so/want to be so/or misremember.

W, while you could argue my fallible memory was due to getting knocked out shortly I have other memories too that I was fully conscious for that me and people who were there don't remember the same. One of us could be right, or neither of us, but most of the time there's some proof beyond just fallible memories.

Also, to clarify, I'm not saying that no memories are valid if there's no proof of them. In many cases, our memories are all we have, and it's fine and reasonable to believe them in those cases since what else are you supposed to believe? But in cases where logic dictates that something didn't happen/isn't real and there's a lack of any evidence whatsoever or evidence to the contrary, the only reasonable conclusion is to admit that it's a case of imperfect memory and that you made a mistake. Anything else is pure delusion and denial.