I'm in a car driving across the intersection that you're barreling towards with no brakes. If we want to bring the analogy closer we could say that there was recently a recall for faulty brakes on your car (similar to the status of the virus being a known outbreak/issue). Fixing those brakes protects not only you but everyone else on the road that you could possibly crash into if your brakes crap out while you're driving.
You can stamp your feet and cry faulty logic all you want but that doesn't change the facts. Changing your oil doesn't protect anyone else but having working brakes and being unable to spread a disease does.
Also, it's kinda funny that you're trying to make a point relating to the logic behind taking a drug to protect others and then when I bring up a logic-based scenario you cry "muh what ifs". Regardless, your logic is simply faulty and I explained it thoroughly in two paragraphs in my last comment, which you mostly ignored instead deciding to focus only on the analogy. (Poorly I might add seeing as you misinterpreted the circumstances entirely and somehow assumed that I meant I was just randomly hopping in front of a moving vehicle on foot)
My 35 years of experience as an RN in ER/ICU/med/surg has reinforced my belief in facts...
What facts? All you've done so far is ignore my core arguments, effectively just declared "I'm right" with no argument, and cried "liberal logic" repeatedly.
I'm in a car driving across the intersection that you're barreling towards with no brakes. If we want to bring the analogy closer we could say that there was recently a recall for faulty brakes on your car (similar to the status of the virus being a known outbreak/issue). Fixing those brakes protects not only you but everyone else on the road that you could possibly crash into if your brakes crap out while you're driving.
You can stamp your feet and cry faulty logic all you want but that doesn't change the facts. Changing your oil doesn't protect anyone else but having working brakes and being unable to spread a disease does.
Also, it's kinda funny that you're trying to make a point relating to the logic behind taking a drug to protect others and then when I bring up a logic-based scenario you cry "muh what ifs". Regardless, your logic is simply faulty and I explained it thoroughly in two paragraphs in my last comment, which you mostly ignored instead deciding to focus only on the analogy. (Poorly I might add seeing as you misinterpreted the circumstances entirely and somehow assumed that I meant I was just randomly hopping in front of a moving vehicle on foot)
What facts? All you've done so far is ignore my core arguments, effectively just declared "I'm right" with no argument, and cried "liberal logic" repeatedly.