Go back to Election Night 2016. Trump was portrayed as the "laughing stock" candidate. Every anchor on MSM would show clips of him and laugh at him/demean him. Polls were cooked up to show Hillary winning by >95% - which furthered the "joke mythos" of Trump. That was all according to plan - to suppress Trump voter turnout.
Now, you're the guy manning the algorithm. The heavy lifting of the algorithm isn't the stealing of the votes. Rather, it is the coverup of doing as much. Remember - this is a high stakes game. If you don't get away with it, people will likely die (including yourself). So, it is always best to err on the side of caution. You dial it down.
As the results start coming in, you ramp it up as much as you can without getting caught. You're still losing. You throw in the towel.
The same premise applies in 2020. We had the "laughing stock" Trump, and polls showing him "wildly unpopular." Difference being, you are now prepared to overwhelm him. Enter the second prong of the attack: mail in voting. Now you have the algorithm for the vote switching, and mail-ins for the cover-fire. You can keep the algorithm "undetectable." But the mail ins offer so much plausible deniability, that you can just go to town with it. And they did.
I was wide awake on Election Night, watching the results - as I have always done. I have never seen state after state report "bugs", "glitches", "emergencies" to stop their counting halfway through the way it happened in 2020. When the voting resumed, heavily Trump states were magically Biden states - all with the help of switching votes and "finding" hundreds of thousands of ballots. Their plan worked.
You should watch the presentation. I don’t think my explanation will do it justice because it’s a clever racket.
The algorithm is set to maintain a preset percentage lead for select candidate. The percentage is based off total registered voters.
What she means by ‘overwhelming the algorithm’ is it took more ballots than total registered voters to maintain the desired lead. They ran out of runway. That’s when they stopped the count, to add more ballots. And why several counties had greater than 100% voter turnout.
sounds like you have not seen how the rigging works. not a question of computing power, but how to get away with it.
Then why the claims of “overwhelming the algorithm”. Her word, not mine
Go back to Election Night 2016. Trump was portrayed as the "laughing stock" candidate. Every anchor on MSM would show clips of him and laugh at him/demean him. Polls were cooked up to show Hillary winning by >95% - which furthered the "joke mythos" of Trump. That was all according to plan - to suppress Trump voter turnout.
Now, you're the guy manning the algorithm. The heavy lifting of the algorithm isn't the stealing of the votes. Rather, it is the coverup of doing as much. Remember - this is a high stakes game. If you don't get away with it, people will likely die (including yourself). So, it is always best to err on the side of caution. You dial it down.
As the results start coming in, you ramp it up as much as you can without getting caught. You're still losing. You throw in the towel.
The same premise applies in 2020. We had the "laughing stock" Trump, and polls showing him "wildly unpopular." Difference being, you are now prepared to overwhelm him. Enter the second prong of the attack: mail in voting. Now you have the algorithm for the vote switching, and mail-ins for the cover-fire. You can keep the algorithm "undetectable." But the mail ins offer so much plausible deniability, that you can just go to town with it. And they did.
I was wide awake on Election Night, watching the results - as I have always done. I have never seen state after state report "bugs", "glitches", "emergencies" to stop their counting halfway through the way it happened in 2020. When the voting resumed, heavily Trump states were magically Biden states - all with the help of switching votes and "finding" hundreds of thousands of ballots. Their plan worked.
You should watch the presentation. I don’t think my explanation will do it justice because it’s a clever racket.
The algorithm is set to maintain a preset percentage lead for select candidate. The percentage is based off total registered voters.
What she means by ‘overwhelming the algorithm’ is it took more ballots than total registered voters to maintain the desired lead. They ran out of runway. That’s when they stopped the count, to add more ballots. And why several counties had greater than 100% voter turnout.