"Cannibal" came from Columbus's misnaming of a tribe (the Caribs) as "canibalis."
The above video is stretching things, almost like Colin on "Who's Line Is It Anyway?" Colin, in a CD commercial skit, told about a strong man at a circus who bent a car. "Man bent a car"? Pat Benatar. That's exactly how ridiculous some of these fake derivations are.
The video is correct though in pointing out the difference between Hebrew, Israelite, and Jew.
The Spanish word "canibalis" did exist, but didn't mean someone who eats people. Also, the Caribs didn't eat people. I would assume the word spread in meaning, much as many other words have. People just called dark tribes cannibals, and then some turned out to actually eat people. We call American tribes Indians, when none of them came from India. So then we started having to say "India Indians" when we were talking about people from India.
Anyway, the video's story is fake news on that point, in spite of the other truths. Some people are bad about mixing truth and lies to make you think all of it's truth. I have seen countless examples of this type of stretching to prove false derivations. I say "stretching" just as Mark Twain used "stretchers" instead of "lies" in his books.
Wow that was really good. It will make many Christians angry i am sure but we should care about the truth.
I have some things to add. Through His mother Mary Jesus had the bloodline Judah (kingline) and Levi (priestline).
The Gibeonities were not destroyed as God said to do and instead Joshua saved them and they became water carriers and scribes in the temple. The tribes were infiltrated by kenites and others from Babylon and Assyria. Herod incorporated priests or levities from Babylon-though those priests from babylon are questionable. Also the postions in the temple were bought and sold and not inherited from the priestline as was required.
All those called "jews" are not of the tribes. Many are infiltrators and many of the tribes are now called Christians.
Many of those in Israel are there to fulfill a different plan and herald a different king when the time comes.
"Cannibal" came from Columbus's misnaming of a tribe (the Caribs) as "canibalis."
The above video is stretching things, almost like Colin on "Who's Line Is It Anyway?" Colin, in a CD commercial skit, told about a strong man at a circus who bent a car. "Man bent a car"? Pat Benatar. That's exactly how ridiculous some of these fake derivations are.
The video is correct though in pointing out the difference between Hebrew, Israelite, and Jew.
Great vid pede. Some butt-hurt fee fees incoming for rizl...
This is one of the better written descriptors of what this vid so brilliantly summarised:
http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/edomites.htm
The Spanish word "canibalis" did exist, but didn't mean someone who eats people. Also, the Caribs didn't eat people. I would assume the word spread in meaning, much as many other words have. People just called dark tribes cannibals, and then some turned out to actually eat people. We call American tribes Indians, when none of them came from India. So then we started having to say "India Indians" when we were talking about people from India.
Anyway, the video's story is fake news on that point, in spite of the other truths. Some people are bad about mixing truth and lies to make you think all of it's truth. I have seen countless examples of this type of stretching to prove false derivations. I say "stretching" just as Mark Twain used "stretchers" instead of "lies" in his books.
Google "cannibal" and read the whole story.
Wow that was really good. It will make many Christians angry i am sure but we should care about the truth.
I have some things to add. Through His mother Mary Jesus had the bloodline Judah (kingline) and Levi (priestline).
The Gibeonities were not destroyed as God said to do and instead Joshua saved them and they became water carriers and scribes in the temple. The tribes were infiltrated by kenites and others from Babylon and Assyria. Herod incorporated priests or levities from Babylon-though those priests from babylon are questionable. Also the postions in the temple were bought and sold and not inherited from the priestline as was required.
All those called "jews" are not of the tribes. Many are infiltrators and many of the tribes are now called Christians.
Many of those in Israel are there to fulfill a different plan and herald a different king when the time comes.
I heard the beginning and I will listen. Jesus has been described as red haired and blue eyed, though the letter of pontius pilate is controversial.
The important thing to me is that the tribes can be traced in their travels and God kept His promises. We should be careful who we support.
Unfortunately and sadly the tribes took on many heathen practices in their travels and from their captivities.
But thankfully, through the apostles,many took the good news of Christ to the world
I am sad that so many Christians are deceived into supporting a lie.
Interesting