Well they have released tons of information. The article you shared says a group is requesting over 300,000 pages of data that would then have to be reviewed to ensure no privacy laws are being broken.
I would read the article again, it mentions how data has to be pored over and potentially edited before turning them over to the requester, it’s not just a process of “here’s the documents you requested.”
Have you worked in documentation? I have, albeit for writing manuals for part catalogues. It’s tedious work, and I imagine it’s even more so when it comes to both medical and scientific data being reviewed.
Likely a place like this has all kinds of requests coming in, and depending on the size of their workforce, can’t get everything done at once. To completely review that many pages would take years, so I don’t doubt at all their request is going to take that long
"The group of scientists argued that releasing data relating to the vaccine would help satisfy vaccine skeptics of its safety and encourage further vaccinations." .... or the exact opposite. By 2076 most of us will be dead... and wouldn't that estimate to about 500 pages a week? I bet one person could easily do that in a day or two. Or maybe I'm dreaming
Looks like Rep. Ralph Norman just introduced a bill to make the FDA release the information in 100 or so days because he stated “After all, the FDA managed to consider all 329,000 pages of data and grant emergency approval of the Pfizer vaccine within just 108 days. So it’s hard to rationalize why it now needs 55 years to fully release that information to the public.” It's a valid point... especially if your gonna mandate it even though you have many people treating themselves at home naturally or even with over the counter supplements, right?
It doesn't make you wonder at all how they approved it so quickly for injection? Less than a year to approve but 55 years to provide the info.. maybe that's just how it goes.. but you would think that something so important, I mean the experts are saying the injection is the only thing that will end the pandemic and save human life... you would think that they could find some funding to hire more then 10 people to provide this information. An answer of 55 years does obviously sound more like an excuse right?
Not all tasks are created equal. Releasing 300,000 pages of information that would need to be reviewed to ensure no compromising info is released sounds like it can take a while, especially considering there were likely teams of people dedicating to releasing a vaccine, and likely not many people prioritizing releasing all that info to whoever requests it.
Why would they need to pull together the funding? What motivation to they have other than to appease the 30 people asking?
I’m not sure what goes into reviewing these particular documents, but I’ve done document review and going solo I could get through about 20 pages per day if I was really cruising (so about 100 pages per week). I can also assume, again, that they have many other requests they have to go through, so I doubt a person is solely dedicated to this task.
What's your thoughts on this? I am curious if all vaccines not just covid vaccines have always had odd side effects like this and the only reason they have to warn us now because of covid being under the microscope.. I have never been anti-vaccine but I have always wondered how and if the world would be different without them... only because I know many families that are against vaccines and they seem to be healthy and fine.
Well according to the CDC cases are mild, as it says in the post.
However, Myocarditis cases also rise for people who contract COVID, and among unvaccinated individuals the effects are far worse and far more numerous.
Most vaccines typically do have mild side effects.
Well they have released tons of information. The article you shared says a group is requesting over 300,000 pages of data that would then have to be reviewed to ensure no privacy laws are being broken.
I would read the article again, it mentions how data has to be pored over and potentially edited before turning them over to the requester, it’s not just a process of “here’s the documents you requested.”
Have you worked in documentation? I have, albeit for writing manuals for part catalogues. It’s tedious work, and I imagine it’s even more so when it comes to both medical and scientific data being reviewed.
Likely a place like this has all kinds of requests coming in, and depending on the size of their workforce, can’t get everything done at once. To completely review that many pages would take years, so I don’t doubt at all their request is going to take that long
"The group of scientists argued that releasing data relating to the vaccine would help satisfy vaccine skeptics of its safety and encourage further vaccinations." .... or the exact opposite. By 2076 most of us will be dead... and wouldn't that estimate to about 500 pages a week? I bet one person could easily do that in a day or two. Or maybe I'm dreaming
Looks like Rep. Ralph Norman just introduced a bill to make the FDA release the information in 100 or so days because he stated “After all, the FDA managed to consider all 329,000 pages of data and grant emergency approval of the Pfizer vaccine within just 108 days. So it’s hard to rationalize why it now needs 55 years to fully release that information to the public.” It's a valid point... especially if your gonna mandate it even though you have many people treating themselves at home naturally or even with over the counter supplements, right?
It doesn't make you wonder at all how they approved it so quickly for injection? Less than a year to approve but 55 years to provide the info.. maybe that's just how it goes.. but you would think that something so important, I mean the experts are saying the injection is the only thing that will end the pandemic and save human life... you would think that they could find some funding to hire more then 10 people to provide this information. An answer of 55 years does obviously sound more like an excuse right?
Not all tasks are created equal. Releasing 300,000 pages of information that would need to be reviewed to ensure no compromising info is released sounds like it can take a while, especially considering there were likely teams of people dedicating to releasing a vaccine, and likely not many people prioritizing releasing all that info to whoever requests it.
Why would they need to pull together the funding? What motivation to they have other than to appease the 30 people asking?
I’m not sure what goes into reviewing these particular documents, but I’ve done document review and going solo I could get through about 20 pages per day if I was really cruising (so about 100 pages per week). I can also assume, again, that they have many other requests they have to go through, so I doubt a person is solely dedicated to this task.
Just 30 people asking? I think it's probably millions.. add me to the to the list.
According to the article it’s “ more than 30,” meaning probably between 30-40
https://greatawakening.win/p/140cEEdhPK/the-cdc-issues-new-dire-warning-/c/
What's your thoughts on this? I am curious if all vaccines not just covid vaccines have always had odd side effects like this and the only reason they have to warn us now because of covid being under the microscope.. I have never been anti-vaccine but I have always wondered how and if the world would be different without them... only because I know many families that are against vaccines and they seem to be healthy and fine.
Well according to the CDC cases are mild, as it says in the post.
However, Myocarditis cases also rise for people who contract COVID, and among unvaccinated individuals the effects are far worse and far more numerous.
Most vaccines typically do have mild side effects.
55 years for a vaccine produced at warp speed? Kind of funny, right?