This is the last two pages of the order from the Louisiana injunction ruling today. It was filed by 14 state attorney generals but the judge ruled the injunction for the country bc “there are unvaccinated healthcare workers in ther states that need protection”. I spent some time rifling through the docs and figured I would give a synopsis of the ruling. )Many of us are informed but never hurts). The threat was that the Medicaid provider agreements would be terminated if the employees and contractors were not jabbed. The big question is does the defendant have the authority. One thing interesting is that they are claiming 2.4 million aren’t jabbed. I would estimate the number higher. From 4/6/20 to 6/21/21 CMS (center for Medicaid services) issues 6 rules/regulations that were to be with the appropriate timeline for adjustments for issues like disinfecting, data reporting, and distancing. However, on 9/9 Biden said he wouldn’t force the vax and then 11/5 said it was to be mandated. The CMS issued the mandate effective immediately, which goes against the reporting timeframe policies they have in place. This was a thorn in the judges side. They had two months to send a directive as they did the six previous times. It’s federal overreach. And IMO, this is NOT a mistake a govt agency makes so blatantly. Preemptive of local and state law. Remember the cruise ships in FL? The ruling was the state has a right to protect its proprietary interest. In this case, the states have a sovereign interest in protecting its citizens. The judge ruled that the mandate overexclusive because it didn’t take into account extenuating circumstances and it was under inclusive as only businesses who have more than 99 employees had to comply. The judge said, it shows the true purpose is not to ensure workplace safety, but to ramp up vaccine intake. THIS RULING IS HUGE! It encompasses the separation of power. It’s aligning with the other 10 AG’s that filed in Missouri. That’s 24 AG’s. The other day we discussed that no AG’s had signed Lindell’s filing. We have to educate the masses to the separation of branches. People are dumb. This is how it begins, so patience frens… we’re getting there!
Edit: Sorry for typos, I’ll fix tomorrow! Stayed up too late “working” and have to work in a few hours!
Do you see anyone asking in court if Covid-19 is real? If it is real, did the Unitied States have a hand in creating and releasing it? When I ask people in power, they do not want to talk to me. I am talking about the local AG and governors office.
Educated guess would be it has to do with taxes. As the judge said… it isn’t about workplace safety bc it isn’t inclusive or every business would have to enforce no matter the size
OSHA claims that the >99 employee limit is because smaller companies don't have the resources and ability to institute it's unlawful and unconstitutional ETS. (OK, I added those ETS modifiers.)
This is the last two pages of the order from the Louisiana injunction ruling today. It was filed by 14 state attorney generals but the judge ruled the injunction for the country bc “there are unvaccinated healthcare workers in ther states that need protection”. I spent some time rifling through the docs and figured I would give a synopsis of the ruling. )Many of us are informed but never hurts). The threat was that the Medicaid provider agreements would be terminated if the employees and contractors were not jabbed. The big question is does the defendant have the authority. One thing interesting is that they are claiming 2.4 million aren’t jabbed. I would estimate the number higher. From 4/6/20 to 6/21/21 CMS (center for Medicaid services) issues 6 rules/regulations that were to be with the appropriate timeline for adjustments for issues like disinfecting, data reporting, and distancing. However, on 9/9 Biden said he wouldn’t force the vax and then 11/5 said it was to be mandated. The CMS issued the mandate effective immediately, which goes against the reporting timeframe policies they have in place. This was a thorn in the judges side. They had two months to send a directive as they did the six previous times. It’s federal overreach. And IMO, this is NOT a mistake a govt agency makes so blatantly. Preemptive of local and state law. Remember the cruise ships in FL? The ruling was the state has a right to protect its proprietary interest. In this case, the states have a sovereign interest in protecting its citizens. The judge ruled that the mandate overexclusive because it didn’t take into account extenuating circumstances and it was under inclusive as only businesses who have more than 99 employees had to comply. The judge said, it shows the true purpose is not to ensure workplace safety, but to ramp up vaccine intake. THIS RULING IS HUGE! It encompasses the separation of power. It’s aligning with the other 10 AG’s that filed in Missouri. That’s 24 AG’s. The other day we discussed that no AG’s had signed Lindell’s filing. We have to educate the masses to the separation of branches. People are dumb. This is how it begins, so patience frens… we’re getting there!
Edit: Sorry for typos, I’ll fix tomorrow! Stayed up too late “working” and have to work in a few hours!
The 99 employee limit is very arbitrary. Lol.
Yes, this judge is seeing through the bullshit.
Do you see anyone asking in court if Covid-19 is real? If it is real, did the Unitied States have a hand in creating and releasing it? When I ask people in power, they do not want to talk to me. I am talking about the local AG and governors office.
Educated guess would be it has to do with taxes. As the judge said… it isn’t about workplace safety bc it isn’t inclusive or every business would have to enforce no matter the size
OSHA claims that the >99 employee limit is because smaller companies don't have the resources and ability to institute it's unlawful and unconstitutional ETS. (OK, I added those ETS modifiers.)
When the Dam breaks.
Interesting read. Do you have a link to the entire ruling and similar ones?
It is huge. It seems like the NWO is falling apart.
I read both dockets, frazzled/ brain dead by the time I posted but I believe this is the link to the ruling.
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/61408494/28/louisiana-v-becerra/
Text should work if PDF doesn’t
THANKS!!