It's okay to post a non disheartening or not completely theoretical post here occasionally. I don't think anybody here is following the stars, but I can only speak for myself.
I don't follow the stars, but I don't mind talking about them.
Sometimes I come across pertinent info that people bring up around here in regards to those "stars".
So many rabbit holes and red pills when studying the Hollywood machinery.
So basically what I'm trying to convey, is that talking about them is not the same as following them.
The "stars" can be considered a metaphor and doesn't actually require for them to be famous. Consider that hollywood is a DISTRACTION.
They thought you would follow the distraction.
It is a divisive mechanism.
While I do see the need to be able to cut away for moments to retain sanity I feel that talking about these people helps that mechanism.
If the war is not won yet do we celebrate the enemy? I cannot say that this one in particular is an enemy at all but considering from where they hail (sports, in this case), within the distraction, I do not think it a far stretch that the enemy would use all sorts of tricks to deceive. Trying to get us focused on "planted" small "victories".
I am in no way upset with this person getting citizenship, I am glad they joined, and am in no way upset with the name change for them personally is that decision. To talk about it is to take away from focus on the battle field. We should be greatful, of course but I feel it necessary to be hesitant with such topics. Perhaps it does serve as a moral boost and I am overlooking the good for the potential bad.
I must also note that talking about anyone is considered gossip. This would be a sin and lends to my previous idea.
Can we please stop following the stars? Haven't we learned this lesson yet?
It's okay to post a non disheartening or not completely theoretical post here occasionally. I don't think anybody here is following the stars, but I can only speak for myself.
I see so many that do
I don't follow the stars, but I don't mind talking about them. Sometimes I come across pertinent info that people bring up around here in regards to those "stars".
So many rabbit holes and red pills when studying the Hollywood machinery.
So basically what I'm trying to convey, is that talking about them is not the same as following them.
I will try to make sense of my thought process.
The "stars" can be considered a metaphor and doesn't actually require for them to be famous. Consider that hollywood is a DISTRACTION.
They thought you would follow the distraction.
It is a divisive mechanism.
While I do see the need to be able to cut away for moments to retain sanity I feel that talking about these people helps that mechanism.
If the war is not won yet do we celebrate the enemy? I cannot say that this one in particular is an enemy at all but considering from where they hail (sports, in this case), within the distraction, I do not think it a far stretch that the enemy would use all sorts of tricks to deceive. Trying to get us focused on "planted" small "victories".
I am in no way upset with this person getting citizenship, I am glad they joined, and am in no way upset with the name change for them personally is that decision. To talk about it is to take away from focus on the battle field. We should be greatful, of course but I feel it necessary to be hesitant with such topics. Perhaps it does serve as a moral boost and I am overlooking the good for the potential bad.
I must also note that talking about anyone is considered gossip. This would be a sin and lends to my previous idea.