Never made that connection before but it's possible - these 'diversity hire' flunkies are probably more apt to go along with or look the other way from a little corruption, because they know who butters their bread in the end. Good observation.
So when we see one of these people should we automatically assume, or at least allow open the possibility, that they are complicit in something illicit?
Never made that connection before but it's possible - these 'diversity hire' flunkies are probably more apt to go along with or look the other way from a little corruption, because they know who butters their bread in the end. Good observation.
So when we see one of these people should we automatically assume, or at least allow open the possibility, that they are complicit in something illicit?