You can be a problematic co founder even after the sale. There's also the angle of what he knew versus what he was interfering with. Reddit was the lone survivor in a lucrative space. I think those questions are valid even if you disagree with his hypothesis.
You can be a problematic co founder even after the sale. There's also the angle of what he knew versus what he was interfering with. Reddit was the lone survivor in a lucrative space. I think those questions are valid even if you disagree with his hypothesis.
So was it the MIT Satanic Child Porn Ring that took over Reddit?