RIGHTEOUS ANGER: St. Thomas Aquinas weighs in on being a passive wussy... - The Great Awakening

201

RIGHTEOUS ANGER: St. Thomas Aquinas weighs in on being a passive wussy... (media.greatawakening.win)

posted 2 years ago by ProPatriaMori 2 years ago by ProPatriaMori +201 / -0

33 comments download

33 comments share download save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (33)

sorted by:

▲ 2 ▼

– ProPatriaMori [S] 2 points 2 years ago +3 / -1

We are not to judge another’s soul. That’s it. We are to judge and admonish one another without being hypocritical. Our justice system is based on judging. We pick spouses and friends and even employment based on judging. This whole “judge not” is probably the most twisted verse in Scripture.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ -1 ▼

– Mostprobably -1 points 2 years ago +1 / -2

Wrong. Laws are for the lawless. We are guided either by Good (God) or Evil (Satan). Free will does not exist

Getting angry at anyone is of the Devil and no matter how hard you try to bend scriptures and words, is wrong.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 1 ▼

– ProPatriaMori [S] 1 point 2 years ago +2 / -1

Free will absolutely exists and it was given to us by God. WE make our decisions, not God, not Satan. Getting angry is not of the devil; was Christ of the devil when he was righteously angered by the money changers in the temple that He Himself fashioned a whip to drive them out? When He flipped the tables was He guided by Satan? Righteous anger is not vengeance.

permalink parent save report block reply

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q