When the evidence of fraud is proven, and the result shows a different candidate won then Judges must intervene and set the record right, and throw out the candidate who was fraudulently elected and seat the rightful winner of the election.
Secondly, those responsible for the fraud must be prosecuted. Thirdly, the newly declared winner of the election should sue the perpetrators of the fraud for Civil Rights violations, and personal injury, loss of income, etc.
What’s great about this one example; it was small enough to provide a clear example of the process. Normies 👀 Also, there was canvassing AND testimony of bribery & vote harvesting. Bing-a-da-BANG.
When the evidence of fraud is proven, and the result shows a different candidate won then Judges must intervene and set the record right, and throw out the candidate who was fraudulently elected and seat the rightful winner of the election. Secondly, those responsible for the fraud must be prosecuted. Thirdly, the newly declared winner of the election should sue the perpetrators of the fraud for Civil Rights violations, and personal injury, loss of income, etc.
What’s great about this one example; it was small enough to provide a clear example of the process. Normies 👀 Also, there was canvassing AND testimony of bribery & vote harvesting. Bing-a-da-BANG.
Absolutely. This was a like a mini-mini Arizona Audit with all the correct steps to prove the fraud.