No digital currency just "came out", what came out was the blueprints for a Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System: https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf, in combination with a piece of FOSS code to demonstrate the concept.
See this is like someone releasing 3D models for gun parts you can print in your own 3D printer. If you'd knew anything about guns you'd recognize the parts and could tell that they where legit. Yet still you're gonna have to deal with sheeples crying that those parts where released by the globalists... why would the globalists do that? They don't want you to have any freedom.
Same with cars, what stops you from building your own car from scratch, other than stupid government regulations and lack of required knowledge? And if you where to succeed on such project, does that mean your custom built car will be just as shitty as any mass produced shit car? of course not. The idea is just retarded.
Just throwing non pertinent t docs at the argument doesn't help your argument right?
So let's dumb this down.
Let's say a bunch of lfuel efficient cars were created. Early on about 1% of the human population got 90% of them. No more will ever be produced.
Now here is the quiz....
Who owns all the cars?
Who doesn't own the cars?
Do you think the 99% who don't own one of these fuel efficient cars would be willing to give up all current cars when their chances of getting one would be next to nil?
Okay let's play your game then, each car and it's owner is listed on a public blockchain as a anonymous key, just like this one: 3J65t1WtEk25CNmQviecrnyiWadfRhWNLy, anyone can download this entire database of keys, but who owns the car(s) associated with the keys...?
Nobody knows, except for one smart ass, he doesn't have any proof whatsoever but he just knows. Oh, and the fact that there's another type of unique production line of cars which we know was banned to own back in the 70's, causing everyone to sell them to the Rothschild family doesn't bother this smart ass, that's still a good store of value and investment.
Tell me, how much gold does the Rothschild family have in their massive vault? we've seen the vault and we can estimate the amount of gold in there but no exact numbers has ever been revealed. And what about cash or bank money, that's an even bigger joke if you truly are against surveillance and lack of control.
1% owns 90%. Right? You are arguing the value of block chain tech. That's not the argument. Never was.
The argument is if 1% already owns 90% of BTC then switching to a btc as the currency basically had transferred almost all liquid wealth to that 1% who already owns all the BTC correct?
That's your claim, which you haven't yet provided any proof for. Nobody really knows who owns how much because there's no way to connect a big number to a identity. Unless explicit proven by whoever holds the private key. Only stupid people show of their entire net worth to the world.
What you're doing here is basically saying: okay 54534556456546 belongs to OneMoreTim3 and 1243454437383 belongs to anatidaephobia, but not a single attempt to prove how you come up with that conclusion. Why do you think 1% owns 90% of all the coins?
Check the rich list again, there's thousands of wallets before you've even counted to 90% of the coins, and most of them belongs to exchanges, that's basically shared wallets without one single owner, even tho you could argue not your keys, not your coins as if those coins belong to the exchange, which is correct. But that's just 1% of the coins owned by the biggest exchange.
No digital currency just "came out", what came out was the blueprints for a Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System: https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf, in combination with a piece of FOSS code to demonstrate the concept.
See this is like someone releasing 3D models for gun parts you can print in your own 3D printer. If you'd knew anything about guns you'd recognize the parts and could tell that they where legit. Yet still you're gonna have to deal with sheeples crying that those parts where released by the globalists... why would the globalists do that? They don't want you to have any freedom.
Same with cars, what stops you from building your own car from scratch, other than stupid government regulations and lack of required knowledge? And if you where to succeed on such project, does that mean your custom built car will be just as shitty as any mass produced shit car? of course not. The idea is just retarded.
Just throwing non pertinent t docs at the argument doesn't help your argument right?
So let's dumb this down.
Let's say a bunch of lfuel efficient cars were created. Early on about 1% of the human population got 90% of them. No more will ever be produced.
Now here is the quiz....
Who owns all the cars?
Who doesn't own the cars?
Do you think the 99% who don't own one of these fuel efficient cars would be willing to give up all current cars when their chances of getting one would be next to nil?
Ever heard of supply and demand?
Okay let's play your game then, each car and it's owner is listed on a public blockchain as a anonymous key, just like this one: 3J65t1WtEk25CNmQviecrnyiWadfRhWNLy, anyone can download this entire database of keys, but who owns the car(s) associated with the keys...?
Nobody knows, except for one smart ass, he doesn't have any proof whatsoever but he just knows. Oh, and the fact that there's another type of unique production line of cars which we know was banned to own back in the 70's, causing everyone to sell them to the Rothschild family doesn't bother this smart ass, that's still a good store of value and investment.
Tell me, how much gold does the Rothschild family have in their massive vault? we've seen the vault and we can estimate the amount of gold in there but no exact numbers has ever been revealed. And what about cash or bank money, that's an even bigger joke if you truly are against surveillance and lack of control.
You completely skipped the argument.
1% owns 90%. Right? You are arguing the value of block chain tech. That's not the argument. Never was.
The argument is if 1% already owns 90% of BTC then switching to a btc as the currency basically had transferred almost all liquid wealth to that 1% who already owns all the BTC correct?
That's your claim, which you haven't yet provided any proof for. Nobody really knows who owns how much because there's no way to connect a big number to a identity. Unless explicit proven by whoever holds the private key. Only stupid people show of their entire net worth to the world.
What you're doing here is basically saying: okay 54534556456546 belongs to OneMoreTim3 and 1243454437383 belongs to anatidaephobia, but not a single attempt to prove how you come up with that conclusion. Why do you think 1% owns 90% of all the coins?
Check the rich list again, there's thousands of wallets before you've even counted to 90% of the coins, and most of them belongs to exchanges, that's basically shared wallets without one single owner, even tho you could argue not your keys, not your coins as if those coins belong to the exchange, which is correct. But that's just 1% of the coins owned by the biggest exchange.