I mean, it's true, but the metrics are what's important. It's been proven it's usually anywhere from 85-95% of people moving to red states are conservative, and same is true in reverse for blue states.
So what this article is saying is true. States are becoming more polarized because people are congregating where they FEEL LIKE they'll be welcome and among like minded individuals. The one thing the article DOESN'T mention is that certain "swing states" are also seeing mass influx of conservatives because while they're deemed "swing states" they're mostly or entirely controlled by the GOP on the state and local level. Pennsylvania, Arizona, Georgia, and North Carolina specifically. So even they're red without cheating, they'll be even redder once this is all done. On the other hand, Crap hole "swing states" like Michigan are just straight up bleeding people since and no conservative wants to move there.
Then there are red states that are just going to get straight up redder. Texas, Florida, South Carolina, Tennessee, Idaho, Montana, Ohio, conservatives are just straight up flocking to these states for more freedom and opportunity.
Correct, but this is a problem because blue states were getting redder, but that has reversed. Now, the conservatives are moving to where they're nice and comfy - places like Texas, NC, SC, etc, but libs are moving to the major cities in those states and driving up the population like crazy.
Not entirely true. Nashville is a good example of this. It's seen such a massive influx of Conservatives over the past couple years that dems are now struggling at the local level to maintain control. Contrary to what some believe, not all conservatives want a rural lifestyle. A very large portion of them DO enjoy the convenience and amenities of Urban life. Look at Trump, he's a Manhattan real estate Mogul. So my point still stands.
Even in urban centers, it's STILL overwhelmingly conservatives moving to these states. Oklahoma is probably THE best example of this. Tulsa is one of the reddest cities in the country, and it's the second largest city in the state.
Likewise, OKC has been getting more conservative to the point it's steadily being taken over on the local level, and becoming more competitive on the state and federal level. Cementing Oklahoma's status as one of the reddest states i the union. Have we already forgotten that our guys are winning in overwhelming numbers on the local level throughout the country? I believe it was in Columbia South Carolina that the GOP recently won the mayoral seat for the largest city in South Carolina for the first time in 50 years by a 8% margin. In other words, a swing of nearly 50% to the right at the local level through a combination of people turning on the left and a massive influx of new red ubran voters from other states.
Though I DO agree that it sucks that these "blue" states are losing red voters because of corruption and cheating. But I'm not too worried about it. Things are going our way in the big picture. Besides, people seem to forget the Q specifically said that "The D party" would be dead when this is all over. Can't vote for a party that doesn't exist anymore, meaning there won't be any "blue" states at all.
Not hardly, all it takes is a look at local races and sentiment. Are we forgetting all of the panic articles the MSM flooded the internet with a few months back about "Qanon" believers winning so many local races, even in urban centers, that now we apparently control something like 70% of local policy in the country?
Besides my evidence is not "anecdotal", as pointed out by the South Carolina Mayoral race and the massive number of local races. That having been said, if you haven't learned yet that the majority of cities are only "blue" because of the absurd cheating the left goes about with, and ignore all of the evidence we're winning and the overwhelming majority, then there's nothing to be done.
I mean, it's true, but the metrics are what's important. It's been proven it's usually anywhere from 85-95% of people moving to red states are conservative, and same is true in reverse for blue states.
So what this article is saying is true. States are becoming more polarized because people are congregating where they FEEL LIKE they'll be welcome and among like minded individuals. The one thing the article DOESN'T mention is that certain "swing states" are also seeing mass influx of conservatives because while they're deemed "swing states" they're mostly or entirely controlled by the GOP on the state and local level. Pennsylvania, Arizona, Georgia, and North Carolina specifically. So even they're red without cheating, they'll be even redder once this is all done. On the other hand, Crap hole "swing states" like Michigan are just straight up bleeding people since and no conservative wants to move there.
Then there are red states that are just going to get straight up redder. Texas, Florida, South Carolina, Tennessee, Idaho, Montana, Ohio, conservatives are just straight up flocking to these states for more freedom and opportunity.
Correct, but this is a problem because blue states were getting redder, but that has reversed. Now, the conservatives are moving to where they're nice and comfy - places like Texas, NC, SC, etc, but libs are moving to the major cities in those states and driving up the population like crazy.
Not entirely true. Nashville is a good example of this. It's seen such a massive influx of Conservatives over the past couple years that dems are now struggling at the local level to maintain control. Contrary to what some believe, not all conservatives want a rural lifestyle. A very large portion of them DO enjoy the convenience and amenities of Urban life. Look at Trump, he's a Manhattan real estate Mogul. So my point still stands.
Even in urban centers, it's STILL overwhelmingly conservatives moving to these states. Oklahoma is probably THE best example of this. Tulsa is one of the reddest cities in the country, and it's the second largest city in the state.
Likewise, OKC has been getting more conservative to the point it's steadily being taken over on the local level, and becoming more competitive on the state and federal level. Cementing Oklahoma's status as one of the reddest states i the union. Have we already forgotten that our guys are winning in overwhelming numbers on the local level throughout the country? I believe it was in Columbia South Carolina that the GOP recently won the mayoral seat for the largest city in South Carolina for the first time in 50 years by a 8% margin. In other words, a swing of nearly 50% to the right at the local level through a combination of people turning on the left and a massive influx of new red ubran voters from other states.
Though I DO agree that it sucks that these "blue" states are losing red voters because of corruption and cheating. But I'm not too worried about it. Things are going our way in the big picture. Besides, people seem to forget the Q specifically said that "The D party" would be dead when this is all over. Can't vote for a party that doesn't exist anymore, meaning there won't be any "blue" states at all.
Voters in Nashville are overwhelmingly lib, and your evidence is anecdotal.
Not hardly, all it takes is a look at local races and sentiment. Are we forgetting all of the panic articles the MSM flooded the internet with a few months back about "Qanon" believers winning so many local races, even in urban centers, that now we apparently control something like 70% of local policy in the country?
Besides my evidence is not "anecdotal", as pointed out by the South Carolina Mayoral race and the massive number of local races. That having been said, if you haven't learned yet that the majority of cities are only "blue" because of the absurd cheating the left goes about with, and ignore all of the evidence we're winning and the overwhelming majority, then there's nothing to be done.