Of course I pray she has a full recovery and is fine, because while I disagree with her about everything, she is my coworker and I want her to be healthy. Plus she actually has a very important role in our small business.
That said, I can't help but laugh about the irony!
I'm still the only pure blood in the office, have never gotten COVID (while 2 of my vaccinated coworkers did) and everyone now is clamoring to schedule their boosters -- including a pregnant woman!! I've gotten to the point now where it's too late, their minds won't be changed, and I just hope they're getting saline solution.
What's your argumentation for deeming it normal
Well because it's a natural inclination for sexual attraction for some people. In terms of marriage, that would be between two consenting adults who have sexual/romantic attraction for one another. When two gay people get married, there is no harm that is being done towards members of the couple, or to anyone else.
So, there is not a negative impact I see to making it a normal aspect of society.
This is the most common trope.
The reasoning that it's "sexual attraction" justifies it. You do know there are people sexually attracted to cars for example, right? As in they get sexual arousal off it, erections etc. There are hundreds of paraphilias and they all share sexual attraction. Pedophilia, zoophilia, necrophilia, etc, those are genuine sexual attractions. Before you jump in with the classic consent counter argument, you do know there is now the technology to make ultra realistic silicone full body dogs, kids or what have you. Following your logic, any sexual acting out with any of those is genuine and natural on the only premise that "sexual attraction" exists. Necrophilia with a real dead animal body would also not violate any rights.
As for marriage, ignoring all the negative aspects of homosexuality you have no idea about, any normalization of behavior encourages it. You think the explosion of "transgenders" is natural or normal? It's not, it's learned behavior because peers normalized it.
I mean if a dude wants to fuck a car I also really don't give a shit. It's his weird life. I don't have to think it's great or praise him or do it myself but I don't care if a man fucks his own car.
Right but that's a different conversation isn't it? I can support homosexuality without supporting pedophilia. There's a line there that I don't cross because now you're removing the aspect of "between two consenting adults."
Transgenderism is also something that, again, doesn't affect me. It's a person living their own life with their own identity. Why should I care how they identify?
But all this is beyond the topic of gay marriage. It's certainly possible to support gay marriage without supporting pedophilia, zoophilia, whatever else.
My stance is acts between two consenting adults are harmless. I don't care what they do in their own lives as long as it's not hurting other people. Gay marriage is not something that I see as a problem.
You have yet to tell me: what are the negative aspects of homosexuality that you see?
It's not, because the underlying argument is "i support it because sexual attraction validates it". You either accept that argument or you don't, that's the foundation for the reasoning. It's not a different conversation, it's the same conversation.
"Sexual attraction validates it."
So you're telling me you know so much about homosexuality and out of all that knowledge NOTHING about it is negative?