What now? I know that the Supreme Court can opt to hear the case.... will they stop this criminal act that is against our constitutional rights?
Comments (6)
sorted by:
Doesn’t matter. I will not comply. Unconstitutional mandates are void.
We the People are running out of Peaceful options....so be it
We shall see...
Pretty sure PepeSee was being sarcastic.
Wait there may be some good news.... The 6th Circuit court appears to have erred in their decision stating:
“At the same time, the options available to combat COVID-19 changed significantly: the FDA granted approval to one vaccine on August 23, 2021, and testing became more readily available,” the majority opinion asserts on page 24 of the ruling.
According to the FDA, the Pfizer shot and BioNTech’s Comirnaty are LEGALLY DISTINCT. Pfizer remains under Emergency Use Authorization while Comirnaty is FDA approved. BUT Comirnaty is unavailable because “there is not sufficient approved vaccine for distribution to the population.”
All the shots are under Emergency Use Authorization—meaning everyone has the right to refuse them. Comirnaty, which has received approval, is not available according to the FDA, NIH, CDC and Pfizer.
A federal district court judge rejected a claim by the U.S. Department of Defense that the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine being administered under Emergency Use Authorization is interchangeable with Pfizer’s fully licensed Comirnaty vaccine.
What does this mean to the 6th Circuit Court ruling? This is huge in terms of informed consent and the protected right not to be experimented on. The ruse designed to hide the unlawful denial of service members’ rights protected under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) is a plausible argument and a federal Judge has already agreed that it is "quite plausible". This also certainly extends to the American working public. RFRA is just as applicable to the military as it is to the general public.