I see a TON of posts directing anger at complicit doctors and hospitals. But the truth is that most people have received their shots at a local pharmacy, not at their doctor’s office.
Most people made the decision, based on media pressure and peer pressure, to go to these chains to get their shots.
This was done deliberately by Pfizer / Moderna / FDA. Doctors with a set patient population would see the adverse events happening in real time. Their patients would come back, complain to them, and they wouldn’t get lost in the shuffle of urgent cares, ERs, or waiting for their side effects to pass. More adverse events would be recorded and sent in because more docs would feel obligated to do so.
As it stands now, docs can push the jab without being personally responsible or liable for it. Or patients go get the jab and tell their doctor after the fact. This was done to specially cut doctors out of the equation and to get people used to trusting government and media for their “health care”.
somebody should ask the WSB guys to track down the ownership stakes of these pharmacies and see if it correlates with the owners/board of the pharmaceutical companies. then we may actually be able to identify some specific people behind this
Good point! I also heard they wanted it done in pharmacies because then there will be no record, so the person can be more easily counted as "un-vaccinated." But your explanation makes a lot of sense.
A big part of this entire tom-foolery is that we want to normalize procedures like this as being like going to McDonalds. We do not want folks going to the doctor for shots. We want this to be "just like" the yearly flu shot (and on my darker days I think that the last 10 years of "go to Walgreens to get your flu shot" was laying the groundwork for this new atrocity).
Indeed, they are now planning to offer a combined COOF + FLU shot.
Normalization of "HaaS". Health as a Service.
EDIT: I should add that the key benefits of HaaS are: 1. An amazing avalanche of your tax dollars, in the direction of the biggest donors, namely "Big Pharma". 2. Total control of the population. If you rebel against us, we will turn off your immune system and within one Winter you will be fish food.
It is not lawful for a pharmacist to administer any vaccine without informed consent. You will be presented with the CDC VIS (Vaccine Information Sheet). You will be asked if you have questions. The pharmacist may give you additional facts based on your questions. The one thing they will NOT do is vaccinate you if you refuse to sign that paper saying that you were informed and you freely give consent to receive treatment as well as to bill your insurer for the cost.
Your doctor will provide exactly the same service in his office. In fact, most if not all of it will be done by a nurse or PA with the doctor overseeing. Vaccines aren't exactly a challenging procedure to get right. The idea that you need an MD to inject you is nonsense.
There's absolutely nothing nefarious about this. ~70% of all vaccines are provided by pharmacists and it's been that way for years. They're cheaper, more available, generally accommodate walk-ins, and they have a doctorate level degree just like the MD. The healthcare system saves an enormous amount of money by shifting this busywork off the primary care docs so they can deal with actually challenging patients.
As for holding people accountable... the same threats made against the docs - to strip your license, yank your privileges, or fire you from your job - were made against the pharmacists, NPs, RNs, PAs, and everyone else. The lawyers in risk management were driving a huge amount of that and they were hanging on Fauci's every word because they were trying to avoid losing big in the Lawsuit Lottery. This gave a green light to CDC, FDA, and the politicians to basically do whatever they wanted because the lawyers and politicians weren't about to challenge "the science" either in real court or the court of public opinion.
The people who need to be in handcuffs facing justice are Pfizer execs who lied about their data, knowingly, the people at FDA who approved despite reports of data tampering and serious breeches of experimental protocol, and the guy running the CDC who paid the "bat lady" to make the virus then lied over and over to try and cover it up.
That’s when I first smelled a rat was when I asked my doctor, “Who gives the shot”? He handed me a list of locations other than the hospital…I said NO WAY! That’s all I needed to know.
I see a TON of posts directing anger at complicit doctors and hospitals. But the truth is that most people have received their shots at a local pharmacy, not at their doctor’s office.
Most people made the decision, based on media pressure and peer pressure, to go to these chains to get their shots.
This was done deliberately by Pfizer / Moderna / FDA. Doctors with a set patient population would see the adverse events happening in real time. Their patients would come back, complain to them, and they wouldn’t get lost in the shuffle of urgent cares, ERs, or waiting for their side effects to pass. More adverse events would be recorded and sent in because more docs would feel obligated to do so.
As it stands now, docs can push the jab without being personally responsible or liable for it. Or patients go get the jab and tell their doctor after the fact. This was done to specially cut doctors out of the equation and to get people used to trusting government and media for their “health care”.
Great insight here! Makes a lot of sense to me!
I don't think individual doctors could cope with the demand
Brilliant and I believe a correct deduction.
Smart observation that I didn't think of before. Likely true. Thank you.
Fits with their other sneaky behavior.
great post, absolutely spot on. I hadnt thought about this. Makes perfect sense now.
somebody should ask the WSB guys to track down the ownership stakes of these pharmacies and see if it correlates with the owners/board of the pharmaceutical companies. then we may actually be able to identify some specific people behind this
Dank insight, thanks!
Good point! I also heard they wanted it done in pharmacies because then there will be no record, so the person can be more easily counted as "un-vaccinated." But your explanation makes a lot of sense.
I think you’re on to something, however, normie uncle will retort with “big deal, I get my flu shot at Walgreens every year too. So what?”
I think all of that is correct.
I would add an additional aspect.
A big part of this entire tom-foolery is that we want to normalize procedures like this as being like going to McDonalds. We do not want folks going to the doctor for shots. We want this to be "just like" the yearly flu shot (and on my darker days I think that the last 10 years of "go to Walgreens to get your flu shot" was laying the groundwork for this new atrocity).
Indeed, they are now planning to offer a combined COOF + FLU shot.
Normalization of "HaaS". Health as a Service.
EDIT: I should add that the key benefits of HaaS are: 1. An amazing avalanche of your tax dollars, in the direction of the biggest donors, namely "Big Pharma". 2. Total control of the population. If you rebel against us, we will turn off your immune system and within one Winter you will be fish food.
It is not lawful for a pharmacist to administer any vaccine without informed consent. You will be presented with the CDC VIS (Vaccine Information Sheet). You will be asked if you have questions. The pharmacist may give you additional facts based on your questions. The one thing they will NOT do is vaccinate you if you refuse to sign that paper saying that you were informed and you freely give consent to receive treatment as well as to bill your insurer for the cost.
Your doctor will provide exactly the same service in his office. In fact, most if not all of it will be done by a nurse or PA with the doctor overseeing. Vaccines aren't exactly a challenging procedure to get right. The idea that you need an MD to inject you is nonsense.
There's absolutely nothing nefarious about this. ~70% of all vaccines are provided by pharmacists and it's been that way for years. They're cheaper, more available, generally accommodate walk-ins, and they have a doctorate level degree just like the MD. The healthcare system saves an enormous amount of money by shifting this busywork off the primary care docs so they can deal with actually challenging patients.
As for holding people accountable... the same threats made against the docs - to strip your license, yank your privileges, or fire you from your job - were made against the pharmacists, NPs, RNs, PAs, and everyone else. The lawyers in risk management were driving a huge amount of that and they were hanging on Fauci's every word because they were trying to avoid losing big in the Lawsuit Lottery. This gave a green light to CDC, FDA, and the politicians to basically do whatever they wanted because the lawyers and politicians weren't about to challenge "the science" either in real court or the court of public opinion.
The people who need to be in handcuffs facing justice are Pfizer execs who lied about their data, knowingly, the people at FDA who approved despite reports of data tampering and serious breeches of experimental protocol, and the guy running the CDC who paid the "bat lady" to make the virus then lied over and over to try and cover it up.
Excellent post. This is where our collective anger should be aimed.
NY was big into using arenas to jab people in the beginning. Faceless anonymous people jabbing others...
That’s when I first smelled a rat was when I asked my doctor, “Who gives the shot”? He handed me a list of locations other than the hospital…I said NO WAY! That’s all I needed to know.