Dont be lazy and ask to be spoon fed like the Boob Tube if you are interested in the topic go out in the wild and hunt for yourself and stop expecting somebody else to feed you. THAT. Is whatโs wrong with so many today โฆ. But thatโs just my opinion!
This is literally a forum for research, and you made an assertion as if itโs fact without pointing to any resources, or even specific examples for your claim. Especially since there is far more information that will refute your claim:
Conspiracy theory "explanation of an event or situation involving unwarranted belief that it is caused by a conspiracy among powerful forces" emerged in mid-20c. (by 1937) and figures in the writings of, or about, Charles Beard, Hofstadter, Veblen, etc., but the degree of paranoia and unreasonableness implied in each use is not always easy to discern. The phrase was used from 19c. in a non-pejorative sense "the theory that a (certain) conspiracy exists," especially in court cases. Its use in general reference to theories of hidden cabals pulling wires behind the scenes of national or global events is by 1871.
โWe shall better understand the ensuing civil war if we study the movements in the four most important of these States, in relation to a theory which asserts that the secession was a conspiracy whose central cabal, composed of Southern senators and representatives in Washington, dictated through its ramifications in the States the inception and the course of the revolution.โ [James Ford Rhodes, page headed "The Conspiracy Theory" in "History of the United States from the Compromise of 1850," New York, 1893]
You are a quack I read reply posts and they all show your ignorance. You should have just shut up ๐ค but by continuing to reply you removed any doubt whatsoever of any intellect the benefit of the doubt might have offered you.
Also, out of curiosity, which of my comments do you believe are โignorant?โ Iโd be happy to debate any:
Was it that Lin Wood acted like a televangelist at the Georgia rally? Did you watch it? Because he did.
Do you believe that the Q drop was being coy or incorrect about Alex Jones being Mossad?
Maybe you believe that the Koch brothers are, indeed, right wing conservatives?
These are the majority of points I have made in recent comments, so Iโd love to know which one, specifically, shows my ignorance. Or maybe itโs one not listed?
No research, articles or data? Well, thanks for your opinion, I guess.
Dont be lazy and ask to be spoon fed like the Boob Tube if you are interested in the topic go out in the wild and hunt for yourself and stop expecting somebody else to feed you. THAT. Is whatโs wrong with so many today โฆ. But thatโs just my opinion!
This is literally a forum for research, and you made an assertion as if itโs fact without pointing to any resources, or even specific examples for your claim. Especially since there is far more information that will refute your claim:
**Definition of low effort post. **
Any monkey can cut and paste from a wiki
You are a quack I read reply posts and they all show your ignorance. You should have just shut up ๐ค but by continuing to reply you removed any doubt whatsoever of any intellect the benefit of the doubt might have offered you.
When one cannot debate the topic, they attack the debater. ๐
Also, out of curiosity, which of my comments do you believe are โignorant?โ Iโd be happy to debate any:
Was it that Lin Wood acted like a televangelist at the Georgia rally? Did you watch it? Because he did.
Do you believe that the Q drop was being coy or incorrect about Alex Jones being Mossad?
Maybe you believe that the Koch brothers are, indeed, right wing conservatives?
These are the majority of points I have made in recent comments, so Iโd love to know which one, specifically, shows my ignorance. Or maybe itโs one not listed?