Both but timing matters. He was initially was wrong or misled into believing there could be a comprhesive approach. At the time Covid was communicated to be much more deadly and contagious (recall the exorbitant death est. of 1-2 million and R-naught est. of 6-7?) than it is. So I get it.
Now, since the vax happened under his watch, he will never admit it was wrong. Even if the negatives outweigh the benefits which becomes clearer by the day.
Both but timing matters. He was initially was wrong or misled into believing there could be a comprhesive approach. At the time Covid was communicated to be much more deadly and contagious (recall the exorbitant death est. of 1-2 million and R-naught est. of 6-7?) than it is. So I get it.
Now, since the vax happened under his watch, he will never admit it was wrong. Even if the negatives outweigh the benefits which becomes clearer by the day.