is this supposed to be a bad viewpoint?
(twitter.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (52)
sorted by:
Very good. If you review my year or more comments you will see I have never argued for the proposals of the stones one way or the other. I tend to agree with your synopsis. That said, lets look at #1. This is construed as population reduction and often mis-read. It is actually a message for a future "coming out of the caves" generation who will be survivors of the coming micro-nova. It's a number that will(may) be sustainable without periodic mass extinction. It will seem like a huge number to the 2 to 5 million who are among the survivors. The project was the brainchild of a group of prophetic "Christians of the Rose Cross" (RC Christian) to provide hope and guidance to a devastated few survivors on a trashed planet with depleted resources. So, ...why the forgotten languages? and ...supwit the time capsule?