Add the EEO personnel in the list of defendants in the lawsuit.
You could also consider filing for a Writ of Mandamus or Writ of Prohibition.
Writ of Mandamus = court order to mandate that someone do something they are legally required to do. This would apply to EEO personnel who are refusing to do their job. They would have to answer in front of a judge why they are refusing to uphold their legal responsibility. Could also apply to VA for refusing to accept exemption.
Writ of Prohibition = court order prohibiting someone from doing something. It might be called a restraining order, injunction, or something else, but the concept is the same. This would apply to VA for singling her out and discriminating against her. Since they have no legitimate basis (no scientific basis) for these actions, they should be prohibited from doing it.
This is not a personal lawsuit against anyone. It is a request for a judge to issue an order. The personal civil lawuit can come later.
Most attorneys-at-law will not file these because they work for the court system, and NOT for you. They don't want to "rock the boat" which really means they don't have any balls to stand up and do the right thing.
But you could likely find one to secretly (attorney-client privileged communications) coach you on how to do it. It would certainly shake up the bureaucrats, who would be identified by name as violating rights, and would be the target of a future lawsuit.
If you can get a judge to agree they are doing something in violation of law, then it should make a much easier lawsuit later, since they would not be able to claim immunity -- a judge already ruled that what they were doing was illegal.
That’s what we would call discrimination.
YES! She is trying to submit an EEO. And surprisingly she isn’t getting much help from the EEO office.
Add the EEO personnel in the list of defendants in the lawsuit.
You could also consider filing for a Writ of Mandamus or Writ of Prohibition.
Writ of Mandamus = court order to mandate that someone do something they are legally required to do. This would apply to EEO personnel who are refusing to do their job. They would have to answer in front of a judge why they are refusing to uphold their legal responsibility. Could also apply to VA for refusing to accept exemption.
Writ of Prohibition = court order prohibiting someone from doing something. It might be called a restraining order, injunction, or something else, but the concept is the same. This would apply to VA for singling her out and discriminating against her. Since they have no legitimate basis (no scientific basis) for these actions, they should be prohibited from doing it.
This is not a personal lawsuit against anyone. It is a request for a judge to issue an order. The personal civil lawuit can come later.
Most attorneys-at-law will not file these because they work for the court system, and NOT for you. They don't want to "rock the boat" which really means they don't have any balls to stand up and do the right thing.
But you could likely find one to secretly (attorney-client privileged communications) coach you on how to do it. It would certainly shake up the bureaucrats, who would be identified by name as violating rights, and would be the target of a future lawsuit.
If you can get a judge to agree they are doing something in violation of law, then it should make a much easier lawsuit later, since they would not be able to claim immunity -- a judge already ruled that what they were doing was illegal.
Thanks MAG! Great information to use