You are asking THE MOST IMPORTANT question: Who is who in the Bible, and who are they today?
THAT is what you need to understand in order to make heads or tails of the story of the Bible.
I will give you my opinion, based on my research:
First, much of the important storyline of the Bible has been infiltrated and changed to have a different meaning. Certainly, terms we use today in our modern day and modern English language, have been changed from what they meant by the people who wrote the OT & NT.
Two quick examples:
-
Adultery today means anyone who cheats on a spouse or bf/gf. But the actual meaning in the Bible is a married woman who has sex with a man who is not her husband. Both she and the man are adulterers. But the term does not apply to a married man (as long as he is not having sex with a married woman), as men can have multiple wives, and God lays out the law for how he is supposed to handle that situation. But a married woman cheating confuses the bloodlines, which is largely what the Bible is about. Bloodlines are the central theme of the Bible. Modern churches ignore this, because they do not want to offend people, so they can rake in more $$$. Therefore, they lie to their congregations, making it all the more difficult to understand the true story of the Bible.
-
Whoremongers cannot get into Heaven. Why? Today's understaning is a man who pays female prostitutes for sex. But there are prostitutes in the Bible, and no man is ever admonished for it. That's because the original meaning of whoremonger is a man who IS a prostitute. Thus, he engages in homosexual acts, which is a sin, and why he cannot get into Heaven.
It's like the Constitution. The Founders had specific meanings of terms and they meant what they understood it to mean. But in our modern era, there are subverters who don't like what the Constitution actually says, so they constantly try to subvert the meanings of what the Founders said and meant.
The Bible is the same.
Did the current "Jews" of Israel descend from the Khazars?
Not exactly.
The word "Jew" was not in the original Bible. It was added centuries later.
The word "Judahite" in the OT was changed to "Jew" and the word "Judean" in the NT was changed to "Jew."
Judahites were true Israelites, but Jews were not (they were Edomites).
Judeans were anyone living in the Roman province of Judea during Jesus' time. Most were Edomites, but there were also Israelites and others.
This is why Jesus said He only speaks to the "multitudes" in parables -- because they cannot understand Him, and He doesn't want them to, anyway. They are NOT HIS PEOPLE.
The Israelites are His people, not the others.
This is why the story is so confusing.
The Jews have turned the Bible upside down, in an effort to claim that they are the Israelites, when they are not. They certainly have never acted like God's people. They have always acted like the "Adversary" -- from the beginning.
The people we think of today as "Jews" are descendants of the Edomites of the Bible, not the Israelites.
Even the Jewish Encyclopedia -- the official history of Jewry -- agrees with this.
The Israelites were captured by the Assyrians, circa 700BC. When released, the Israelites migrated north into the Caucasus Mountains (hence: "Caucasian"), and later westward into the wilderness of Europe (hence: "Europeans").
By the time of Jesus, most of the Israelites had migrated away to the north and west, though some were still living in Judea.
The Israelites of the Bible are the White Europeans, not the Jews.
Note: Paul ONLY wrote his letters to his blood brothers in Europe. And Paul stated that he was an Israelite, of the tribe of Benjamin (Romans 11:1).
The Edomites also migrated north into the Caucasus at a later time. They were the primary population of Khazaria, but it also included some of the remaining Whites and some of the neighboring Turks.
They race-mixed, and became the Khazarians.
Later, they would migrate into Europe, as well.
Once in Europe, they settled mostly among the Germanic population. These Germans were White and a part of the Israelite family.
The Jews there called the Germans "Ashkenazi" because they claimed that the Germans were of the Ashkenaz family tree in the Bible.
They called themselves "Ashkenazi Jew" to distinguish themselves from the Germans.
But the Jews were wrong on both counts.
The Germans are descended from Shem (not Japheth).
The Jews are little trickier because they are a mixed race. They are of Esau/Edom (hence: Edomites), and Esau was of the Shem family tree, too.
But Esau race-mixed with the Canaanites, who had race-mixed with the Kenites, neither of which was of Shem.
So, the Germans today are true Semites (of Shem) and the Jews today are not.
The Sephardic Jews are also Edomites, but they took a different path of migration and race-mixed with darker races, giving them a different appearance from the "Ashkenazi" (so-called).
Where did the Pharisees (who rejected Jesus) flee to during the diaspora?
In Judea during Jesus' time, the Sadducees were the religious "experts." They practiced Judaism, which was called the "Tradition of the Elders."
These elders were rabbis who came up with their own views of what the Bible is supposed to mean, and they basically created an anti-Bible. Their ideas, which later were put into writing and is now the Talmud, were attempts to GET AROUND God's Law (Moses' Law), and not to follow it.
The Pharisees were a mix of people living in Judea, mostly Edomites, who followed the teachings of the Tradition of the Elders, which formed their understanding of the OT Bible. But they were being misguided by the teachings of these rabbis.
IOW: They thought they were following and understanding the OT, but they were not. Remember: Most of them couldn't read the scriptures back then, and you couldn't just go down the local bookstore and pick up a copy of the Bible. You had to rely on other people who CLAIMED they had read and understood the Bible. But these elders were misleading people.
When Jesus showed up, the Pharisees asked lots of questions to see if Jesus understood the Law, as they understood it. Jesus corrected them many times, and they got angry with him (just like many people reading this right now are getting angry with me -- lol).
The Pharisees probably migrated north, as most were Edomites. But a Pharisee was simply a student of "The Law" and not a separate race of people.
And are they afiliated with the Khararian "Jews" at all?
The people using the term "Khazarian Jew" never ask where did THEY come from?
They somehow think they just appeared out of nowhere, or from the Turks.
But clearly, the Ashkenazi (so-called) Jews are not Turkish, like the Sephardics are.
Khazaria is an interesting part of history that has been deleted by the Jews because it makes them look really bad. A true understanding of the Bible story is where it's really at -- but that makes them look even worse.
So, you won't find any of this on History Channel anytime soon.
There are so many layers to all of this.
You can say that again!
You guys use Khazarian Mafia as a synonym for Jews.
Personally, I don't use that term, other than to respond to people like you, who do.
I just say "Jews." I don't need to use KM. I assume that people know that I am talking about the Jews at the top of the influence pyramid, but I guess that assumption is misplaced on those who don't research any of this.
But as long as you brought it up ...
KM is a term used to describe the Jews who have committed so many atrocities and created chaos and harm to so many societies for centuries.
The world needs to know this part of history, because it has been kept hidden from most people. We need to learn from history so we don't repeat the bad aspects of it.
Sure, not all Jews are involved. And not only Jews are involved. They recruit many "Shabbos Goys" (a false term they use).
But MOSTLY it is Jews who are involved -- at the top of the structure that is the "Cabal."
Do some research and you will realize it, too.
I once thought the way you do about this topic. But then I did some research, and my thoughts today are based on that research.
That book you just wrote above blames Jews 30 times. You basically just made my point.
All I'd have to do is click deport and your book would be gone.
And you would do that if you are an intellectual coward.
You would choose censorship and cancel culture over debate.
Such behavior is anti-American.
The Founding Fathers would roll over in their graves if they knew what you cancel culture people were like today.
What debate? We agree, 100%.
No, we are on opposite sides of this issue, but you want to be cute by using a straw man argument.
I posted a thread about Jew haters using Khazarian mafia as a synonym for Jews -- that was the gist of my entire post.
As I said, I don't sugar coat it. I just say "Jews" were other people might say "KM."
I happen to think that is a dumb term, but that is for another discussion.
In your OP, you told us who you think the "Cabal" is.
You listed Hollywood actors, politicians, leaders of large companies and NGO's, communism leaders, and health care leadership. And the people at the top who pull their strings.
I simply responded by pointing out that EVERY one of the areas you mentioned JUST SO HAPPEN to be run by Jews.
Prove me wrong. You can't, because it's true.
In your OP, you said:
Then enter those pushing the Khazarian Mafia narrative.
We know that Khazaria did exist at one time, even though it has been completely scrubbed from our history books.
But today, "Khazarian Mafia" is just a convenient term to use to describe those people who have been trying to infiltrate and control, in the shadows, like the Illuminati once did.
Yes, there is a "Cabal."
The people at the top stay hidden in the shadows. We can speculate on who some of them might be, but we don't KNOW for sure.
But what we DO know is that they have put people THEY trust into positions of influence in society -- those areas you listed.
And when we look at those names, guess what we find?
A lot of kosher shit.
The guys at the top did not put a bunch of Chinese or Peruvian people in the top postitions.
They put Jews in those positions.
It should be obvious why.
You can blather on all you want, but you cannot refute that because it is fact.
You asked in your OP:
How would the author know if information was removed from history books?
I will tell you. The Jewish Encyclopedia, as well as other older resources, DO include information about Khazaria, but modern history books do not.
Clearly, SOMEONE removed this part of history.
Regarding the specific term of "Khazarian Mafia," I found a mention of that term in a book from the 19th century. So your claim that the term is very new, is not accurate.
But the term (KM, Illuminati, whatever) is IRRELEVANT.
The specific term used is just a placeholder for an idea.
It is the CONCEPT behind the term that matters.
You are stuck on irrelevant minutiae.
In your OP, you then pivoted to Hitler with a bunch of nonsense.
So, I responded to that garbage, as well.
Holocaust if fake. Anyone who does not know that by now has their head in the sand.
You asked in your OP:
If you're at a MAGA gathering and about to see Trump, do you want Patriot Front, feds in khakis, showing up and standing next to you -- showing support of the president while chanting Nazi rhetoric? No, you don't. They aren't doing MAGA any favors.
I agree with you. That is bad optics.
But it is ONLY bad optics due to the massive ignorance about these topics that most people suffer from. Including you, it seems.
Again, learn from history, or be condemned to repeat it.
And the reason people do not learn from history is that they are LIED TO about history.
History is written by the victors, and truth has nothing to do with their storytelling.
Toward the end of your OP, you said:
I hate Mossad. I hate the government of Israel.
To that, we can agree.
But I will ask you: How did the government of Israel and Mossad gain so much political influence ... without Jews directing that result?
You seem to have a blind spot, and that will prevent you from learning the lessons of history.
Of course, if you yourself are a Jew, then I can understand why you would be upset about everything I say, because your people have been a destructive force to my people, throughout history. So, excuse me if I am not a fan.
But if you are not a Jew, then ... research what I say, and see for yourself.
Or stay ignorant. It's your choice.
Interesting snippet from that:
... blackmail material allegedly used by Netanyahu's office.
Among the revelations? What they describe as Netanyahu’s personal blackmail archive—private footage of world leaders and politicians captured through hidden cameras in their homes, along with hacked phone and laptop data.
Allegedly, this trove was used to control not just adversaries, but powerful figures both inside and outside of Israel.
Such was the devastating nature of the kompromat, Netanyahu knew there was no time to waste. This wasn’t just a breach—it was an existential threat to Israel’s global influence and the shadow networks it relies on. Within hours of the breach, war was declared.
Under the cover of “preemptive defense,” Israeli warplanes launched coordinated strikes on key Iranian military and intelligence facilities. But the real targets weren’t weapons—they were people. Senior operatives. Data servers. Hidden bunkers. Anything and anyone who could possess or leak what Iran had uncovered.
Why the urgency? Because if even a fraction of this kompromat goes public—if the world sees the true scale of Israel’s blackmail operations, their deep ties to Western institutions, their weaponization of pedophilia, and how far they’ve gone to stage-manage geopolitics—the fallout will be catastrophic.
This isn’t about protecting national security. It’s about preserving the illusion—and ensuring the world never sees behind the curtain.
First case study: Jeffrey Epstein. The official story says he died in a New York jail cell. But those in the know aren’t buying it—and neither should you. When the heat became unbearable and the risk of exposure too great, they didn’t sacrifice him… they rescued him.
Epstein was smuggled out of the U.S. under the nose of the so-called justice system and quietly returned to Israel. A high-value asset protected at all costs. It was a masterclass in misdirection—Israel pulling the strings, making a mockery of U.S. law, and showing just how deep their influence runs.
Yes—that 9/11. Stay with me. Because the evidence we’ve uncovered doesn’t just raise questions. It blows the official narrative wide open.
Netanyahu first “predicted” the World Trade Center would be attacked in his 1995 manifesto ‘Fighting Terrorism: How Democracies Can Defeat Domestic and International Terrorists.’
As though that wasn’t damning enough, there is the video in which Netanyahu chillingly explains the details of exactly what was going to happen on September 11, 2001.
For anyone out there thinking, “Sure, maybe Netanyahu had foreknowledge of 9/11—but he’s telling the truth this time about Iran’s weapons of mass destruction…”
Think again. US intelligence assessed just weeks ago that Iran is not building a nuclear weapon.
Here’s the reality: Netanyahu has been crying wolf about Iran’s “imminent” nuclear bomb for over 30 years. Every year, a new deadline. Every year, the world inches closer to war—based on nothing but fear and fabrication.
Sound familiar? It should. He used the exact same script with Saddam Hussein—feeding the Bush administration exaggerated claims about Iraqi WMDs to push for war.
The result? No WMDs. Just endless bloodshed, destabilization, and a legacy of lies.
The truth is, Netanyahu didn’t just know about 9/11 in advance—Israel was behind it. And for those willing to go down the rabbit hole, the evidence isn’t just circumstantial—it’s overwhelming.
These allegations smell A LOT like the things Q claimed, saying how huge this story is, it could topple governments.
Just wish we could get this from a source that might seem more credible to others.
Regardless, this article is WELL WORTH a read. Just make sure you have your tin foil hat secured tightly. It's a gonna be a bumpy ride!
More interesting comments in that thread:
June 7th, Iran releases a media statement that they have successfully hacked into the Israel governments data system and obtained expansive documents, pictures and videos crucial to Israel's security. Complete media blackout in US.
June 12th Israel attacks Iran. In order to destroy the data which has already been secured elsewhere.
The Nuclear being referred to by Trump and Netanyahu is Israel's Blackmail Database.
Israeli Leaders Engage in Satanic Ritual Abuse June 17, 2025
"They claimed that 'Doctors, educators, police officers, and past and present members of the Knesset were involved in these abuses'."
Interesting comment in the thread, when someone said Iran is allies with Russia and China. Response
true. But it is important to note, in 2019, the Americans finished building a naval intelligence base in Haifa. Benjamin Netanyahu handed over the base to the Communist Chinese less than 60 days later in January 2020. China is the only country allowed to have a permanent military presence in Israel. The Americans are not allowed in Israel.
Yeah ... when you are in a negotiation with someone ... and you decide to bomb the shit out of them a couple days before the negotiation ... puts a little damper on the other side's attitude.
Not that Iran was actually interested about negotiations before, but now they are REALLY not interested.
Let's see if Trump can pull a rabbit out of the hat on this one.
Oh no, I've been called a "jew-hater!" How will I ever fix my social credit score?
LOL.
AI says that is the old way of thinking:
(((Who))) programmed the AI computer?
These studies suggest that the name "Ashkenaz" may have originated in that region
Is the history of that region older than 3,500 years?
You might want to re-think that source ...
First, the folks at Wikipedia refute your source, and they appear to be much more in line with my position:
Yiddish, historically Judeo-German, is a West Germanic language historically spoken by Ashkenazi Jews.
It originated in 9th-century Central Europe, and provided the nascent Ashkenazi community with a vernacular based on High German fused with many elements taken from Hebrew (notably Mishnaic) and to some extent Aramaic.
Most varieties of Yiddish include elements of Slavic languages and the vocabulary contains traces of Romance languages. Yiddish has traditionally been written using the Hebrew alphabet.
By the 10th century, a distinctive Jewish culture had formed in Central Europe. By the high medieval period, their area of settlement, centered on the Rhineland (Mainz) and the Palatinate (notably Worms and Speyer), came to be known as Ashkenaz, a term also used for Scythia, and later of various areas of Eastern Europe and Anatolia.
In the medieval Hebrew of Rashi (d. 1105), Ashkenaz becomes a term for Germany, and אשכּנזי Ashkenazi for the Jews settling in this area.
Ashkenaz bordered on the area inhabited by another distinctive Jewish cultural group, the Sephardi Jews, who ranged into southern France. Ashkenazi culture later spread into Eastern Europe with large-scale population migrations.
Nothing is known with certainty about the vernacular of the earliest Jews in Germany, but several theories have been put forward. As noted above, the first language of the Ashkenazim may have been Aramaic, the vernacular of the Jews in Roman-era Judea and ancient and early medieval Mesopotamia.
The widespread use of Aramaic among the large non-Jewish Syrian trading population of the Roman provinces, including those in Europe, would have reinforced the use of Aramaic among Jews engaged in trade.
In Roman times, many of the Jews living in Rome and Southern Italy appear to have been Greek-speakers, and this is reflected in some Ashkenazi personal names (such as Kalonymos and Yiddish Todres).
Hebrew, on the other hand, was regarded as a holy language reserved for ritual and spiritual purposes and not for common use.
Jewish communities of the high medieval period would have been speaking their own versions of these German dialects, mixed with linguistic elements that they themselves brought into the region, including many Hebrew and Aramaic words, but there is also Romance.
There is much, much more on the Wiki page to flesh it out. Just search for: Yiddish.
But even more to the point --
I will also give you this link, which directly calls out the researcher in your article and says his claims have been debunked (for what it's worth):
... antisemites [yeah, whatever!] ... were further emboldened when the Israeli molecular geneticist Eran Elhaik [the researcher that your article cites] ... in 2012 published a study that purportedly proved the theory.
Elhaik compared the DNA of Jews with that of Armenians and Georgians, which he used as replacements for the ancient Khazarians. “Our findings support the Khazarian hypothesis and portray the European Jewish genome as a mosaic of Near Eastern-Caucasus, European, and Semitic ancestries,” the study concluded.
[NOTE: Do you see the problem with this "research?" He never had any DNA of the true Khazarians. He just used Armenians and Georgians, which ARE related -- to SOME degree -- to SOME Jews.]
However, both Koestler’s and Elhaik’s research was quickly refuted by countless others, with some experts even referring to proponents of the theory as “outlier folks… who have a minority view that’s not supported scientifically.” Others have called the Khazarian hypothesis “junk science.”
Indeed, the Khazarian hypothesis has been debunked by virtually every field of science. For instance, historians stress that the kingdom most likely never converted to Judaism. Archaeologists excavating in the former Khazar lands have found almost no artifacts displaying Jewish symbols. Moreover, linguists point out that Yiddish — for centuries the language spoken by Eastern European Jews — is in no way similar to the vernacular used in Khazaria, nor do Jewish surnames from the last 600 years contain any link to the kingdom.
Experts in Jewish genetics have lambasted Elhaik’s “findings,” arguing that he “appears to be applying the statistics in a way that gives him different results from what everybody else has obtained from essentially similar data.” In fact, most DNA research proves precisely the opposite: namely, that European Jews are closely related to Middle Eastern populations.
Most of this research has long been readily available, with leading scholars having refuted Elhaik’s paper within a year of its publication. Nevertheless, Jew-haters and anti-Zionists alike continue to use the Khazarian myth to deny the Jewish people’s millennia-old connection to the Land of Israel.
See there? He called you a "Jew-hater" for posting that link.
LOL
And I will leave you with this, from that website:
Interestingly, Elhaik — who served in the Israeli army for seven years — has said that it bothers him that individuals utilize his research for nefarious purposes.
Yiddish is just a spin on German.
It was invented AFTER the Khazarians, and not in the area of Khazaria, but in the region of the Germanic people (where Jews were living, though they were not of the Germanic people).
Those Jews invented Yiddish, to hide what they were saying from the local Germans.
The Turks are Arabs, and Jews do not claim to be Arab (lol).
Let's go WAAAAY back, long before Khazaria, which was only 1,200 years ago.
The Jews of today are descended from the Edomites of the Bible.
The White Europeans of today are descended from the Israelites of the Bible.
Here is how the whole thing got turned on its head:
The Isrealites were enslaved by the Assyrians, around 700 BC.
When released, they migrated not back to Israel, but north into the Caucasus Mountain region (which is why they are called "Caucasian").
The Edomites lived south of the Kingdom of Judah, in an area called Edom or Idumea (the Roman name for Edom).
When the remaining Israelites, Judahites, and others living in the Kingdom of Judah were captured by the Babylonians, the Edomites moved into to the vacant land.
By the time of Christ, this area was Judea, and it was populated by a diverse group of people, with Edomites being predominant.
The Sadducees of the Bible were Edomite Jews, and many (but not all) of the Pharisees were, as well.
They practiced Judaism, which is antithetical to Christianity, which why they were always trying to trick Jesus into saying something wrong about Mosaic Law.
Later, the Edomites (ancestors of today's Jews) would also migrate north, also into the Caucasus Mountain region.
"Hey! Where did all da White peepo go?"
The Jews always have to infiltrate White society -- it is what they do. They migrated north, just as the Israelites had done centuries before.
Some of the Turks, who are Arab, also migrated into the area.
These various groups race-mixed, at least to some degree, and they were the people of Khazaria.
The Edomites were Jews and followed Judaism, which should explain why Khazaria forced everyone to convert to Judaism -- just like Horkanos mandated back in the biblical days of Judea.
We are now 800+ years after Christ.
Most of the Israelites had already migrated away from the Caucasus Mountains and westward (mostly) into Europe, where they settled the land and became known as the Caucasians and Europeans.
The "Ashkenazi Jew" is not ORIGINALLY from Khazaria. He is an Edomite, who migrated north, and then west into Europe (following behind the Whites).
Ashkenazi Jews look similar to White Europeans because they race-mixed with some of the Whites back around Khazaria, and also later in Europe.
But the term is actually yet another name-stealing lie by the Jews.
In the Medieval Period, Jews living in Germany started calling the White Germans "Ashkenazi" because the Jews there claimed that the White Germans were descended from Ashkenaz, in the family tree of Japheth in the Bible.
Then, the Jews in Germany started calling themselves "Ashkenazi Jew" and this is also around the time they created the Yiddish language -- in Germany.
But the Jews were wrong (whether on purpose of by mistake). The White Germans were not of Ashkenaz, which would be the line of Japheth. Rather, they were (and are) from the line of Shem.
Ironically (or not, if you understand the purposeful deception of the Jews), it is actually the Germans who are Semitic (along with other White Europeans) -- NOT the Jews.
The Jews wanted to claim their lineage as that of Shem, so they could claim to be the Israelites of the Bible, but that was just a stolen idenity (just like the Khazars were known to do a few hundred years earlier).
The Jews are the Edomites. Some of them came by way of Khazaria, mixed with others, and further migrated into the White countries of Europe -- which is what they always do.
The Sephardic Jews are also Edomites, but they look different from the Ashkenazi Jews. That's because the Sephardic Jew, race-mixed more with darker races -- the Turks, other Arabs, and Negros.
But both Ashkenazi and Sephardic are Edomites, and both are Jews.
There is no such thing as "fake Jews."
That is yet another Jewish lie to confuse the story.
And they leave out their TRUE history from the mainstream history books for the same reason.
You also will not find this story on the History Channel or any other mainstream source -- which they control, since 90%+ of ALL mainstream news (TV, radio, newspaper, magazine, etc.) are owned by just 6 media companies, and they are all controlled by executives at the top of the corporate structures, who are ... JEWS.
So, that should explain A LOT for people who are baffled by the Jewish Bullshit.
You're welcome.
:-)
P.S. The term "Khazarian Mafia" goes back at least 100 years, but of course the Jews don't like to promote that idea.
That's why facts (or alleged facts) need to be stated, discussed and debated.
Something your side consistently refuses to do.
The OP is full of alleged facts that could be debated, but when that debate is attempted by our side, we get nothing but red herring and evasion from your side.
Here is an example of an alleged fact by the OP:
Here is the origin of the coining of the term Khazarian Mafia. The term was coined in 2015. Prior to that it was never mentioned.
Now, I happen to KNOW that this claim is absolute bullshit.
That's only 10 years ago, and I ran across this term long before that.
I didn't believe the people using the term then -- because I had not ACTUALLY researched why they were saying what they said -- but I KNOW the term was around.
I don't have any citations to cite, though, because WTF cares to store every citation of everything they might come across in a given day?
Nobody.
But if somehow I did have such a source to point to, it would be discounted by your side, out-of-hand.
Most of us won't bother, then, sourcing many things. We know you wouldn't accept it, anyway, so we talk PAST you to the others reading here, and give them information so they can research and decide for themselves.
Your side never seems to want to explain WHY you think what you do. With the sole exception of someone (you? I don't remember) claiming to have a relative who liberated the camps.
OK, I can at least see why he would believe what he does. He ignores the possibility that propganda was involved, but that is another discussion.
Most on your side don't even explain to that level. You just keep repeating the narrative, and leave it at that.
But that is not critical thinking.
instead of demanding to be force-fed “sources” that you will always find some reason to reject
Exactly!
A few of the mainstream narrative sympathizers around here will never accept anything that might possibly prove their views wrong. Cognitive Dissonance at its finest!
Funny thing is, almost nobody on this side of the debate started out on this side. We all started out on the other side.
But we DID OUR OWN CRITICAL THINKING.
A missing ingredient for many people, it seems.
thats why we are here instead of watching CNN
Spot on, again.
About those liberations --
Yes, there were of course liberations of the camps. But there was also propaganda in the telling of those stories.
Here, Anne Frank's step-sister tells a British TV show that the photos of the Auschwitz liberation were FAKE ... and how she knows that.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/138EteRjYwQD/
Here is a 1970's TV game show, and it shows you how "upset" the American people were about the "Holocaust" back then (i.e. the propaganda had not even taken root, yet) --
https://m3.gab.com/media_attachments/97/52/17/97521748c42b6de7867f7b9dbcc09423.mp4
They are those who conspire to rule over us, kill us and enslave us and will use any means to do so.
That is true.
But most people never dig deeper and ask the obvious question: Why?
What is their MOTIVE?
It goes much deeper than money. They already have a lot.
Nobody goes to the trouble they do just to pile on a few more bucks.
What is the MOTIVE?
Answer that, and you can begin to understand the big picture.
I haven't even watched the Khazarian Mafia video (yet) ... but, in response to your post, OP ...
Most actors ...
Who runs Hollywood? Mostly jews. Harvey Weinstein, anyone?
Most politicians ...
Every. Single. Member ... of Congress, other than Massie, has "an AIPAC guy" to tell them how the jews want the votes to go.
Most leadership of large companies ...
MOST of the media is controlled by 6 corporations, ALL of which have jews at the top of their corporations.
All leadership of NGOs that are given public tax dollars, as a money-laundering operation ...
One of the biggest NGO funders of the foreign invaders is HIAS and is run by jews. This includes the former DHS secretary Mayorkis -- both a director of HAIS and a jew, running the goverment department responsible for STOPPING illegal invasions, but he secretly FUNDED it instead.
Most leadership of colleges which have been infiltrated by communists ...
Communism was INVENTED by jews, and they used it to murder tens of millions of White Christians. But THAT part of history doesn't make it into the history books, does it?
Most leadership of healthcare ...
Most of the CDC and Pharma company hierarchy that were responsible for creating the fake Covid vaxx and for pushing it (illegally) onto the public were jews, including the CEO of Pfizer and Director of CDC.
Do all of these jews ALSO have Shabbos Goys to help them in their treachery? Yes, of course. They can't do it all themselves. There are ALSO non-jews involved.
But do not pretend that there are not A LOT of jews pushing agendas that are harmful to society. They certainly ARE, and have been for a long, long time.
ALL of the tranny and faggot shit is pushed by jews, behind the scenes. The first tranny operation clinic was in Germany in the 1920's. Hitler shut that shit down.
Much of the degeneracy that most here on GAW object to is funded by wealthy jews. IT. IS. A. FACT.
The jews at the top have an AGENDA -- and that agenda includes destroying White culture, and eventually the White race, because they are Jewish Supremacists. But they don't just think they are better. They think they MUST rule the world.
This is what many of them ACTUALLY believe. If you are unaware of this, or this sounds crazy to you, it is only because YOU DON'T KNOW.
You are ignorant on this topic -- as I once was, and as most others still are.
But the world is waking up ...
Regarding Khazaria, the jews themselves have an entire section about it in their Jewish Encyclopedia, which is THEE authority on Judaism and the jewish people.
But ... it is omitted from the public school texbooks, because the publishers of those books are companies run by jews -- including Mossad jew Robert Maxwell, back in the day.
If you cannot see the EXTREME inordinate influence that this 2% of the population has, then you are BLIND.
Call it KM or whatever. The name is irrelevant. The FACTS are what matters.
You can CLAIM that "it's not all muh jews"(tm) ... and you might even be right ... BUT ... ALL JEWS benefit from this undeserved influence their people have in society. VERY FEW (as in close to zero) jews ever call out the HORRIFIC things that jews have done over the years, such has grift off of their lie about the Holohoax.
They have been showered with many billions of dollars -- really trillions when you think of the enormity of this influence -- all for a damn LIE.
They get the hard-working American to pay taxes and fund the jewish Israeli state to a point that it has several hundred nukes (we don't know how many, because they are the ONLY nuke power in the world who refuses to have their shit inspected), and threaten people with this arsenal.
They CONSTANTLY lie about who they are and what their true motives are.
Patriot Front -- doubtful these are feds. Feds would want you to believe that to discount what they say. But these guys do not have the influence of Antifa or BLM, and are not promoted in the media, so they are clearly not feds.
Hitler -- the Holocaust is fake. It started as a British intel story to be pushed as propaganda, but even they thought it was too absurd to run with it. The documents for this have been found in the British archives. But your average, mainstream "historian" is a coward, and doesn't want to take a look. They are afraid of backlash.
According to the World Almanac (the internet authority of the day), there were 15.3 million jews living in the world in 1933, and 15.8 in 1948. Clearly, 6 million did not disappear.
FDR, Churchill and De Gaulle all wrote books after the war. There were NO mentions of any Holocaust. Eisenhower (a jew) had to create a FAKE "gas chamber" when he invited members of Congress over in 1945-46.
TV shows in the 1950's and 1960's NEVER mentioned anything about a Holocaust. "To Tell the Truth" even had a guest who claimed to escape from TWO German prison camps. Nobody on the panel, or the guest, mentioned anything about a Holocaust -- it was all laughs and amazement of how he did his escapes. He said he was afraid of being captured by the Soviets, not the Germans. And since he escaped from TWO prisons, and was still alive after the war, the Germans clearly did not have it in for him to kill him.
The TV show "Hogans' Heros" was a COMEDY about a POW camp in Germany during the war. The TV show was in the 1960's, and nobody claimed outrage about making fun of a "Holocaust."
It wasn't until the jew Steven Spielberg did the movie "Shindler's List" that the real propganda started ramping up. It was a movie version of the book, which was a book of FICTION. It says right on the jacket that "This is a book of fiction. The names, places, and events are a creation of the author's imagination."
Jews LIE about the Holocaust because it is their golden ticket to steady paydays via misplaced sympathy.
I did not know ANY of this 10 years ago. I was like you and everyone else -- deceived by the propaganda.
The difference between me and others on GAW versus you, is that some of us have shed our blinders and looked at the REAL EVIDENCE.
Anyone who does that -- and is not already completely biased against objective facts and claims on BOTH sides of this issue -- will come to realize that the entire thing is fake.
And upon further research will discover that almost everything that the higher level jews push in society if also fake.
They cannot accomplish their true goals if too many people see through their lies.
You should read the German monk Martin Luther's paper on "The Jews and their Lies." That was written 500 years ago.
It has been an issue for a long, long time.
Luther lived when the printing press was becoming useful to European society. That's how he learned the truth.
Today, we have the Information Age.
Each of us can choose to learn new ideas, or stay asleep.
OP, you are free to post what you believe. Tell us your thoughts. That's fine.
But it is quite repulsive that you would rather censor people who disagree with you, than to have an actual debate of substance.
VERY repulsive.
I suspect it is because you KNOW that you cannot handle a real debate.
Same motive as the libtards.
For anyone reading this and would like more info to flesh out why many of us think the Holocaust is fake, this interview is one of the best, most concise I have seen. Benton Bradberry had a life-long passion for history, and became fascinated with the Germans and the Holocaust story. He started out believing it was true, as most people do. But his own investigations, including talking to people who were living in Germany and Poland at the time, convinced him otherwise. He wrote a book about it, and here he is interviewed about why he wrote the book. The first few minutes have really bad audio, so you might want to skip to 7:00 in.
Hey, I think I know that chick ...