3
MAG768720 3 points ago +3 / -0

And the "good" doctors and "good" nurses, who had oh-so virtuous of intentions ... would have been the ones who made the kill.

1
MAG768720 1 point ago +1 / -0

And so is Pfizer and the gubmint dimwits.

1
MAG768720 1 point ago +1 / -0

She made her choices and I have to respect that.

We respect that they have a right to make a choice -- good, bad, or otherwise -- but we are under no moral obligation to respect the actual choice they make.

If we can say with certainty that it was a poor choice, we should not respect it.

2
MAG768720 2 points ago +2 / -0

Looks like Elon has more house cleaning to do. Gotta get the dirt cleaned out.

1
MAG768720 1 point ago +1 / -0

Just the next round of propaganda: "The Cover-Up."

2
MAG768720 2 points ago +2 / -0

Allow a communist to be installed in government, and this is what happens.

3
MAG768720 3 points ago +3 / -0

if someone can admit they were wrong

I think a lot of people are pointing out that this is a fairly rare occurrence.

What to do if they won't?

2
MAG768720 2 points ago +2 / -0

I recently met someone who works at helping the homeless.

After trying to help ALL the homeless, he finally realized that he should focus his efforts ONLY on those who actually want to be helped.

Same concept.

But that does not mean we can't tell the others that they are fuck ups, hopefully to get them to wake up.

1
MAG768720 1 point ago +1 / -0

And this is why I think it is important to piss them off, from time to time.

MAKE them confront that FACT that they were wrong, whether they will openly admit it or not.

1
MAG768720 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's why it must take so long, or so "The Plan" seems to be.

If Trump came in with guns blazing in 2017, things would have been much different.

How exactly is hard to say, but definitely different.

1
MAG768720 1 point ago +1 / -0

Like I said elsewhere in this thread, MOST nurses are sheep.

2
MAG768720 2 points ago +2 / -0

Rand was waaaaay ahead of her time, but that is partly because she personally witnessed the attempted overthrow of Russia by the commies in 1905, as a little girl. She KNEW, first hand, what tyrants are like.

1
MAG768720 1 point ago +1 / -0

Just a hunch, the Covid vaccines (not all) are impacting a small percentage of the population.

I agree with that hunch.

It seems obvious to me that the evil bastards who pushed this would have used it as an experiment, to see which batches did what sort of harm, and how that verified or did not verify their so-called "gain of function" research.

Fortunately, I think the vast majority who got the mystery drug injected into them will ultimately not be harmed much -- due to this round.

But the goal was to make it a normal, routine thing, so that the next rounds could do more and more damage, and likely to specific groups or individuals.

3
MAG768720 3 points ago +3 / -0

Recently saw some TV for the first time in awhile.

It has become absolutely disgusting.

3
MAG768720 3 points ago +3 / -0

It is the jab shills who wanted us all dead who didn’t take it that are the problem.

It goes even deeper than that.

It is the evil motherfuckers behind the entire scam who are the problem, and society needs to deal with them directly.

4
MAG768720 4 points ago +4 / -0

No.

Most nurses are sheep.

Not all.

Most.

The "Dancing Nurses" were most likely hired propagandists. Nothing more, nothing less.

-1
MAG768720 -1 points ago +2 / -3

Oh for fuck's sake, go argue with a tree or something.

Looks like I am.

-1
MAG768720 -1 points ago +2 / -3

But what makes you think he is credible on THIS subject?

A mechanic who know Chevys might not know enough about Mercedes to get the job done.

Has he considered the possibility that "turbo cancers" came about immediately after the vaxx injections, and that they might be caused by something nefarious in the injections?

2
MAG768720 2 points ago +2 / -0

"Gain of function" research is most likely used to figure out how to target certain individuals' bodily functions to harm or kill them, via direct "vaccine" injections. There is no other efficient way to harm someone than a direct injection.

THAT is what all the propaganda was about: making injections seem normal.

Do not forget: When US government gives money for "research" on Subject X, they can re-direct that money to something entirely different and use it for Subject Y instead, with NONE of it actually going to Subject X.

This is called "Dual Purpose Funding."

2
MAG768720 2 points ago +2 / -0

A picture is emerging that Fauci/NIH (and Baric at UNC-Chapel Hill) probably funded research both at UNC and Wuhan Lab.

Wuhan Lab is where the propaganda plandemic started.

It would not be surprising if certain individuals employed there were on the payroll either to purposely start the scam, or because they were too stupid to realize they were used to start the scam.

-1
MAG768720 -1 points ago +1 / -2

someone credible/in the field

What makes you think he is credible?

1
MAG768720 1 point ago +1 / -0

a 180 degree flip flopper

Not surprising, since he has no idea what he is talking about.

He is merely SPECULATING about what MIGHT be this or that.

He has not presented (here, at least) ANY REAL RESEARCH.

view more: Next ›