Thank you for the resources!
I have been looking into these things for several years. Tough to sort through fact from possible fact.
I wonder if you have ever heard of (and have any info on) a man named John Nelson.
There was a man named Robert Fox, who passed away a few years ago.
His 12-hour weekend lecture on the law is on video (Bitchute, maybe still on Youtube, even). He had a lot of great info, and I could tell he was the real deal. Too bad his lecture was not nearly complete enough.
He mentioned his friend he worked with a lot, John Nelson. Fox thought Nelson was #1, which says A LOT considering how knowledgeable Fox was.
Fox even won a case that was cited in the annotated statutes, which is extremely rare.
Fox said that when it comes to law, comparing anyone to John Nelson was like comparing a Cessna airplane to the Starship Enterprise.
So, I wonder if you ever came across the name. I haven't found anything.
It was a con job from the beginning.
But in the beginning, the Federal Reserve Note was backed by gold and silver.
That ended, and it became worthless paper ("fiat"), with value only determined by what people are willing to exchange it for, which might one day become ... nothing.
But the entire process was put in play from the beginning, knowing it would take a few decades to accomplish.
This is no different than the digital currency push, which starts out offering benefits that suck people in to make them used to it and have reasons for liking it.
But the back-end harmful effects (built in from the beginning) are not unleashed until much later -- used to track you, identify you, approve or disapprove you, and force you to bend the knee or have your digital currency become worthless overnight when it is just ... shut off ... and worthless.
So, US Treasury had gold, and made certificates for that gold. The certificates would be redeemable in gold.
Gave the certificates to the Federal Reserve, in exchange for Federal Reserve Notes (considered an even exchange at the time).
Back then, FRN's were redeemable in gold, too. Said so right on the face of the "dollar" currency ($1 was redeemable in silver, $20 redeemable in gold, for example).
But then ...
FRN's became NO LONGER redeemable in gold, but instead became redeemable ONLY IN MORE FRN's.
So, Fed still held the certificates that were STILL redeemable in gold, but Treasury now held FRN's that were not.
After decades of inflation (caused PURPOSELY by the Federal Reserve), the currency is now a small fraction of value vs. gold to what it once was.
Back then, gold was priced at about $20 per ounce.
Today, gold is $3,000 per ounce -- it now takes 3,000 FRN's to buy 1 ounce of gold, whereas back then it only took 20.
Bottom line: The people who run the Federal Reserve (behind the scenes -- the names and faces in the media are just the front men) have STOLEN the gold that belonged to the American People.
Theft by fraud is not valid.
The gold STILL belongs to the American People, rightfully, and we should arrest and imprison those still alive for this crime, and take back what belongs to us via the federal government.
BTW ...
There was NO LEGITIMATE REASON for the US Treasury to engage in this "deal" with the Federal Reserve in the first place.
It was a con job by the Federal Reserve operators, from the beginning.
It was the REAL PURPOSE for the formation of the central bank from the very start. EVERYTHING ELSE that ANY central bank does or says is smoke and mirrors to cover up the fact that stealing your wealth is their ONLY real purpose.
They just have to use a more sophisticated strategy to do it than your average bank robber does.
The US Treasury is given the constitutional authority over money, and has never had any legitimate authority to delegate that authority away.
This is especially so when they failed to ever watch what the Federal Reserve (a private business, and not a government agency) was doing as it was stealing the wealth of our government and us.
Mmany government employee traitors went along with it and/or were too stupid to understand it and/or too lazy to uphold their oaths of office over the years.
But those in office today have a DUTY to correct this fraud.
EXCELLENT COMMENT.
These common law actions need to become more common.
Another writ is Writ of Mandamus to mandate that someone do something that is (a) required by law to do, and (b) they are refusing to do (such as turn over documents, for example).
The 9th Amendment is the one they never want to talk about, because it preserved ALL rights that existed at the time of the adoption of the Constitution.
I would love to see any links or sources of info on all of this you might have.
The people at the top KNOW exactly what they are doing.
But the greater number below them -- the useful idiots -- are dumb enough to BELIEVE the stupid ideas are "for your own good." These are the people who actually CARRY OUT the destructive ideas.
Wearing a face mask never had any science behind it. The people at the top that we never see had to know this, but they pushed the idea onto the useful idiots like Anthony Fauci and Deborah Birx, and THEY (and their underling true believers) were the ones who pushed it on people and made all the threats.
Not to mention Karen at your local grocery store, who is just batshit crazy, and BELIEVES she is trying to help you, but is not aware enough to research anything for herself.
Best explanation I've seen that explains the psychology behind the stupid ideas, and why they never stop coming with their stupid ideas.
They may even be incapable of seeing them as stupid, at least from their current mindset.
Ernest Hancock said there are 2 types of people in this world: Those who want to be left alone, and those who will not leave them alone.
Won't leave others alone, because "it's for their own good." These people are REALLY dangerous to society.
GME's actual business is a loser.
Companies that lose money get punished in bear markets.
However, twice when "somebody" pumped the stock price up, Cohen cashed in by doing secondary offerings.
That put a bunch of cash on the balance sheet, even though it did nothing to make the underlying business better (so far).
Today, the ONLY "profit" is from the interest earned on that cash in the bank. The operating business loses money.
The only thing they are doing with that interest income is subsidizing the business' losses and paying down current liabilities (mostly, accounts payable). OK, but that does not build a business.
Looks to me like Cohen wants to buy bitcoin, in hopes that it will bail him out.
He doesn't seem to have much of a plan to improve the actual business, though.
Massie responding to AIPAC:
“AIPAC always gets mad when I put America first,” wrote Massie on X. “I won’t be voting for their $14+ billion shakedown of American taxpayers either. Let them know what you think by replying to their post. They are intentionally misrepresenting my intent and the resolution I voted against.”
Let's talk about UK's Keir Starmer.
From Wiki --
During the 2024 general election campaign Starmer said in an interview that he would try to avoid working after 6 p.m. on Fridays in order to observe Shabbat dinners and spend time with his family.
Starmer is an atheist, and has chosen to take a "solemn affirmation" (rather than an oath) of allegiance to the monarch.
He also accompanies his family to services at the Liberal Jewish Synagogue in north London.
From 1986 to 1987, Starmer served as the editor of Socialist Alternatives, a Trotskyist radical magazine produced by an organisation under the same name, which represented the British section of the International Revolutionary Marxist Tendency (IRMT).
Basically, a communist jew-wannabe.
This should explain everything.
I agree with you about the pope.
But I wonder -- as a Catholic, how do you remain a Catholic while denouncing the pope?
Is it just this pope, or all popes?
And if there is no pope, how does that change Catholicism?
Seems like the Catholic religion puts a massive emphasis on a pope.
Just curious.
The rich already pay the vast majority of taxes.
We should not follow the communist slogan: "From each according to his means, to each according to his needs."
That only leads to bloodshed via continual stealing of more and more money.
That's actually what you are endorsing, whether you know it or not.
How about we fund the federal government the EXACT SAME WAY the founders did in the beginning?
They had small tariffs and excises, but they relied largely on the apportionment clause of the Constitution.
In today's world, if the feds say they "need" $7 trillion for the federal budget, they write it up as a tax bill, and send it to the states, according to apportionment.
If California has 10% of the population, then California would get a bill from the feds for $700 billion (10% of $7 trillion).
If they refuse, then the feds take over the offices of the state government, since the state government would then be in violation of the Constitution by not upholding a republican form of government.
If California has 35 million people, and the bill is $700 billion, then every man, woman, and child would be responsible for paying $20,000 (family of 4 pays $80,000) for THAT YEAR ALONE.
This drives home just how out of control the federal government is.
We would revolt and refuse to pay, and we would be looking for the heads of the government employees who did this to us.
Each state would have options on how to tax its people -- an income tax, property tax, sales tax, capitation (per person) tax, or only those over the voting age, or however they wanted to do it.
But this is really the only HONEST method of taxation -- which is why it is in the Constitution -- and would cause the federal government to self-regulate back to only its constitutional limitations.
"Keystone" would make sense here.
POTUS - at the top
Cabinet - appointed by POTUS, and head of the departments
SES - Senior Executive Service - THE DAMN GATEKEEPERS, who prevent, delay, impeded, and fight against the orders of POTUS/Cabinet that they don't like, and stop the orders from the top to actually function down below at the Civil Service employee level; many of these are criminals, actively engaged in sedition at best, treason at worst -- probably taking orders from outside the Chain of Command (think: Soros, etc.)
Civil Service - workers/bureaucrats at the bottom, who carry out the functions of the federal government (unless they are blocked by SES)