... it would be expanding once it was done subduing the largely Christian monarchy that existed before the Bolshevics for almost a millenia. The same monarchy that had dealt with a little group of thieves called the name changers... who made their livings and fortunes preying on traders going either directing through their lands... Khazaria.
I haven't looked into it much, but I suspect the reason the jews wanted to destroy Russia in the early 20th century has to do with how the Russians pushed the jews out of Russia back in the days of Khazaria.
Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, known for his book, "Gulag Archipelago" where he detailed the horrors of the Soviet gulags, also wrote the book, "200 Years Together" where he went into detail about the death and destruction the jews wreaked on the Russian people for at least 200 years prior to the 20th Century.
It is all pretty interesting when you dig and think for yourself instead of relying on opinions from Jews and the jew schooled we see all about us. As the vast majority of scholastic texts is controlled by that same group.
Let's not forget that Ghislaine Maxwell's father, Robert Maxwell," was a jew, a Mossad operative, and also publisher of history text books for nearly ALL American grade school students.
The false propaganda runs deep.
Not easy to overcome for most people.
See my thread on "The Law of Primacy," which explains why most people have difficulty breaking out of their early brainwashed programming:
[Shipped off to prison camps] If they were lucky. More likely, they would simply be shot.
Although that could have happened, theoretically, I am not aware of credible reports that German soldiers did that as a routine practice. Germans actually had RULES to follow, despite the propaganda to the contrary.
Many people have been decieved by the movie "Schindler's List" where jew Spielberg depicted brutality by German guards as a routine, daily thing.
But that entire movie was based on the book, and that book was FICTION.
It won the LA Times award for "Best Book of Fiction."
The inside cover explicitly states, "This is a book of fiction. All events are either a creation of the author's imagination, or used fictitiously. Any resemblance to persons, places and events is entirely coincidental."
Yet, Spielberg directed the movie in such a way to deceptively make people believe it was a documantary.
It was not.
It was fiction.
And we do not have reports -- other than from jews, who lie -- about such brutality.
Did you bother to look at the brutality of the jewish communists in Poland, doing unthinkable things to the German people?
A partisan (combatant) not in uniformed clothing is not protected under the Geneva convention, neither are they "subject to prisoner of war treatment".
Maybe not, but the Germans did not systematically execute them on the spot. They treated them as prisoners of war, nonetheless.
So this is the moral justification for starving another country's entire population?
It is not an excuse; it is an explanation.
When the allies cut off all supply routes, including for food, then guess what?
THERE WAS NO FOOD AVAILABLE -- even for the Germans. That's why the German's were starving, too.
That's why the prisoners in the camps were starving, too.
As a military tactic, we could say that it was the "right" move to cut off supply lines.
But the consequence of that was mass starvation in all areas where the Germans had control.
All the other points worth discussing, I'll omit. I can see that you believe what you believe, and I'm not going to try to argue you off it (what would be the point, right?)
I have researched this quite a lot, and find the lack of knowledge by so many people to be downright offensive -- but then again, the History Channel is not exactly a bastion of truth when it comes to anything having to do with Hitler or WW2.
So, I undestand the mass ignorance.
I do not buy into the idea that Britain (or British rulers) was blameless or innocent in all this, but neither do I accept the nation that Hitler and the Nazi regime were innocent, were victims, and otherwise wonderful people forced to do bad things because other, more evil people, forced them into it.
Churchill, in particular, was evil.
The entire war started when jews in Poland were mass murdering ethnic Germans living in "Poland" after the borders had changed.
Hitler finally went in with his military to put a stop to it, which he did.
But England used that as an excuse to declare war on Germany, as I said.
The British and French started WW2. They declared war on Germany.
Germany never declared war on them -- to the end.
The jews were coming for the Germans after they murdered millions of Russians. Then, it was the rest of Europe, and then the rest of the world.
We can see in hindsight that this is exactly what has happened since WW2.
They may not have murdered everyone else like they did the Russians, but they have certainly infiltrated the US government and many other governments around the world, and have pushed their communism and their Kalergi Plan to genocide the White race.
They also want to genocide the Palestinians.
The history is pretty clear -- for anyone who will open their eyes and take an objective look.
As for the examples you cite, Patton (one general), victims, incidents, and more, I think this simply illustrates how any person can take a particular data set and then reach conclusions or make interpretations based on the chosen overriding framework or perspective.
I wasn't there in Berlin, as WW2 was ending.
Neither were you, I presume.
But Patton was.
He said what he said for a reason.
And died mysteriously, shortly thereafter.
By which I mean, one case: M looks at A, C, E, G, and concludes "this means X", when N looks at B, D, F, H and concludes "this means Y". And O looks at ABCDE and concludes "this means Z".
What each person (chooses) to look at, and what conclusions they draw from them, obviously says something about the person and their chosen framework (worldview) as much as it does about the actual available data.
If that was how the WHOLE WORLD worked, then there could never be any court trials or convictions for anything.
We look at ALL of the known evidence, not just cherry-picked selections.
We evaluate both/all sides of the evidence and theories.
THEN ... we arrive at conclusions.
That is how it SHOULD work.
But today, we have a lot of people who want to confuse issues and ignore evidence.
Conclusions based on insufficient evidence are not valid.
I do not find your argument (aka as laid out here) convincing or persuasive. There is already a plethora of counter-arguments in my mind, but I'm not keen to discuss further a very complex subject with extremely broad ramifications and nuances, as to what we see in the world.
We've both stated our perspective, and position, and made an exchange based on that. As it is, I'd call that a win.
OK.
I will mention, however, I think your constant reference to and emphasis on "(communist) jews" (10 times) is a strong indicator. Of what? Well, you decide for yourself.
It is an indicator of my understanding that jews created communism, and did so for the express purpose of causing chaos, so they could "divide and conquor."
It's the old (a) thesis >> (b) antithesis >> (c) synthesis strategy.
This strategy has been going of for LONG before you or I were born.
And it has been repeated, ad nauseam.
"He who fails to learn from history is condemned to repeat it." -- George Santayana
"The reason we fail to learn from history is that we are lied to about history." -- Harry Browne
"You can thank the likes of the History Channel and other jew-controlled media outlets for lying to us about history." -- Me
After all, ALL the "mainstream" (so-called) news channels are either owned by or controlled by jews.
https://gtvflyers.com/thumbs/media_thumb.jpg
Coincidence?
I think not.
It seems reasonable to consider that maybe the jews have an agenda to lie about what actually happened -- after all, they have received BILLIONS of dollars in "reparations."
Although I am not persuaded, I appreciate the effort you made to lay out your perspective. Cheers
Have a good day.
My dad was Dutch.
I suspected that might be the case.
It is terrible that brother fought brother in WW2, just like in WW1 and the Civil War.
But governments are sometimes run by bad men.
The Dutch government was officially "neutral," publicly, with regard to the war between England/France and Germany.
But ... the Netherlands government was secretly helping the British launch a suprise attack on Germany though the low countries.
England was shipping tanks across the Channel and storing them in the Netherlands for that invasion.
Germany figured this out, and that is why they went in to the Netherlands, to head off that attack.
Here is a short video clip of a group of ex-German WW2 soldiers touring a military museum, and they run into a young Dutch woman and have a conversation with her.
She complains that the Germans made her uncles "vanish" (she does not know why, but assumes the worst).
The Germans ask a few questions, and realize that her uncles were "partisans" -- locals who were attacking the occupying German military/police forces.
Such men, if found, were shipped off to prison as prisoners of war, since they were fighting against the Germans, even though not in military uniform. They were guerilla forces, effectively, and subject to prisoner of war treatment.
It sucks, but the Americans did the same to the Japanese-Americans who were suspected of secretly helping Japan during the war.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1PJkNZ30WV0
In the latter years of the occupation, Germany took ALL the food from the Netherlands, so that the entire population was starving.
Right. In the later years of the war, the German people were starving, too, because the allies cut off all supply routes -- including food.
... millions of innocent and non-Jewish people suffered under the Nazi regime during WW2, in all countries, including Germany.
If you watch that video clip, you will see that the German soldiers explained that the communists, who had just murdered White Russian Christians by the millions, HAD TO FIGHT because the jews (communists) were coming for the Germans next.
Here is a timeline post-WW1, where Germany had lost the war and communist jews were running various operations to take over Germany back in 1918-1920 or so.
https://alphahistory.com/weimarrepublic/weimar-republic-timeline-1918-20/
Also, remember that the jews declared WAR on Germany and boycotted German goods, worldwide, which put a severe strain on their booming economy:
The methods of torture, brutality, etc, used by the Nazi regime are well recorded.
I question that.
There were German prison guards who were prosecuted by the GERMANS for abuse of prisoners.
There was one German camp commandant who was EXECUTED -- by the Germans -- for abuse.
Those ex-German soldiers explain that such things were not allowed in the German military. But it was common in the jewish communist government of Russia.
The stories of brutality are told by the jews, and much of those stories are either fabrications or actually attributable to the communist jews operating in Poland.
Do you want to see some brutality?
Post WW1, the German/Polish border was redrawn. Many German people who had been "living in Germany" were now suddenly living on their same farm, but they were now "living in Poland" -- under the Polish government, which had been taken over by communist jews (from Russia).
Their land didn't change. The political borders did.
And the Germans living there were subjected to massive rape, torture, brutality and murder/genocide by the communist jews in control of Poland.
Hitler pleaded with other European leaders to help put a stop to this brutality, but nobody would listen.
That's because the English wanted war with Germany. Germany had suddenly become the strongest economy in Europe -- in just 5 years under Hitler's leadership -- and the English leadership felt it was a threat to their economic strength. THIS is the real reason for WW2, or at least one of them.
Finally, Hitler sent his army into Poland to put a stop to the bloodshed, and England/France immediately used that as an excuse to declare war on Germany.
THIS is REAL brutality -- take a look:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/GvJVRJdPi9K8
Those were German VICTIMS, not perpetrators.
But the Regime, headed by Old Adolf, was the brutal driving force that destroyed so many lives, including German (non-Jewish) ones.
Again, the stories of brutality are told by the jews, not the Germans (who have been mistreated and silenced since the war).
Like some, I am of the view that the whole Jewish thing has been utilized to create a smokescreen for what has really been going on behind the scenes. By which I mean, the anti-semetic vs. pro-jews dichotomy is simply another case of divide and conquer. But that's another story.
Yes, that is "another story," and I will just finish here by saying that jews are NOT semites. They are a mixed race, only partly semitic, and therefore not true semites.
Therefore, the claim of "anti-semitic" is a lie, promoted by the jews (of course, as it has benefited them greatly at everyone else's expense).
It IS truly tragic that your father and his fellow kin had to suffer, along with the other Europeans of the time, and the Americans who thought they were helping, but as Gen. George Patton said, once he realized the whole thing was a scam:
We fought the wrong enemy.
Muhammad was a jewish pedophile.
Which the jewish Talmud promotes, as well.
Muhammad's jewish friends created Islam to become a threat to Christianity, once Rome converted and Christianity was becoming very powerful.
Goat milk works as well, I presume? I do know where to get raw cow milk if not.
Goat's milk has a little more calcium than cow's milk, though it might depend on the breed of each. Sheep's milk is also a possibility.
A lot depends on what tastes best to your taste buds, but I think they are all comparable.
I’d as soon cut my own arm open and chew my own tendons as chew on raw beef liver like it’s bubble gum. Maybe if it’s life or death and I’m in Siberia, sure!
LOL.
Now, chewing on your own flesh ... there's a thought ...
Caffeine flushes calcium and magnesium from the body
🤬
Yeah ... but it is what it is.
Funny, I've been hearing some commercial for "plant-based caffeine."
AS IF there's an "animal-based caffeine."
Some people will sell anything for a buck.
Any idea on the coconut oil pulling? I’ve heard about it for years but never tried it long term.
I've heard of it. Never tried it.
Have no opinion.
AE --
I've had cavities in the past, and some fillings. But that was long before I had any understanding of nutrition.
In some cases, the tooth might be damaged enough that it can't heal itself, but my understanding is that cavities can, in many cases, heal.
You want to "re-mineralize" the tooth.
You have a cavity due to malnutrition, whether you realize it or not.
The tooth needs minerals to heal, especially calcium.
But not in pill form, as those are fake.
Needs to be from real food.
1 cup of milk has about 300 mg of calcium. 3-4 cups per day should be enough calcium.
If you drink milk, make sure it is whole milk, not skim, 1%, 2%, etc. You want that fat. Raw milk would be ideal, and non-homogenized would be second-best, but not always easily available everywhere.
You can also get calcium in eggs. Each egg is about 25+ mg. I like to take 1 dozen raw eggs in my protein shake, which is about 300 mg, similar to 1 cup of milk.
Beef and beef liver are also good -- liver, especially, for all the many minerals it has.
Here is my "Nutrition 101" thread --
https://greatawakening.win/p/1ASt1HI882/
MOST IMPORTANTLY ... AVOID FOODS (and liquids) that either block the absorption of minerals or flush minerals from the body.
Caffeine flushes calcium and magnesium from the body, so avoid coffee, tea, and soft drinks.
"De-caf" might be ok, but really those drinks have nothing beneficial.
Spinich, in particular is HORRIBLE. It has the highest oxylate content of any food, which blocks the absorption of minerals, and also causes kidney stones.
Of all the foods you listed, salmon, eggs, chicken liver, cod liver oil, ground beef, and dairy are all good. Everything else is pretty much trash -- either just sugar or anti-nutrients.
Personally, I would try cutting a small piece of RAW steak and chewing on it like bubble gum around the area of the cavity. I don't know if this will help, but gut instinct tells me that the nutrients would mix with your saliva, which could be beneficial. A small bit of raw beef liver might be even better, though not taste as good.
Best liquid to drink is distilled water (pure H2O, with no inorganic minerals added, unlike all other water).
Probably take a few months to heal, if you eat the right foods and avoid the wrong foods/drinks.
Good luck!
Gladio started out with the code name "X2."
X2 was a group of American military personnel disguised as regular civilians, living in various European countries after WW2.
They were the "stay behinds" who were there to keep tabs on political parties and leaders in European countries, to root out any hint of communism rising in Europe.
Later, the name was changed to "Operation Gladio."
Gladio then morphed into a worldwide operation to infiltrate countries all over the world, especially in Asia, as Vietnam was heating up.
Later, it infiltrated everywhere, including the USA.
I believe that Obama was part of Gladio, either directly or indirectly.
CIA was trying to infiltrate American politics to control it, just like they did in other parts of the world.
Why WOULDN'T these assholes bring it full circle back to the USA?
This post indicates that Gladio has further morphed into something that includes ISIS and other terrorist operations (probably with CIA behind the scenes, I would guess), but I have not looked into it much recently.
Would not surprise me, though.
Right. Hitler wrote all about how the jews were destroying Germany and Russia in his book, "Mein Kampf," and he told everyone who would listen that he would put a stop to it.
Here are 2 rabbis who claim they had "no idea" why "Hitler hated jews."
Then they discovered it was because jews created communism.
And although they don't say it, communism has been the one ideology more responsible for mass murder in the history of the world than any other ideology.
Reminds me of a funny comment I saw on another forum awhile back.
Apparently, AOC was bitching about Tesla cars and Elon Musk. She said something like she will stick with her VW.
Someone replied: Wait 'til she finds out who created Volkswagen.
LOL.
I find it QUITE DISGUSTING that you want to pretend that jews were not raping, torturing, murdering, and genociding the White Russian Christians in Russia by the MILLIONS ... during the 1920's and 1930's.
You want to pretend that Hitler just had it in for muh jews and muh rich guys ... FOR NO REASON?
Fuck that.
Berlin and Moscow are about the same distance apart as Kansas City and New York.
The German people KNEW the jews were slaughtering the Russians, and they were coming for the Germans next, and then other Europeans (Whites), and then eventually the Americans.
So, FUCK that dishonest take, pretending you don't know what the jews did to the Germans and the Russians, and you want people to think Hitler was just "crazy."
It is disgusting that you would try to play that game with a stupid meme.
Not to mention, Adolph would not have wanted anything to do with Mamadami, AOC, or any other communist.
He was fighting AGAINST the communists to SAVE HIS PEOPLE from the communist jew scum.
Antifa started in 1920's Germany, NOT 2020's USA.
You seem to have no clue that "socialism" has more than one meaning, and your ignorance puts you on the side of the genocidal jews.
it is quite a pathetic take.
Patriot Front are a group of White men who want to see the White men, women and children strong and proud, once again.
Would you expect them to be a bunch of fat slobs?
Would you expect them to be tatted up with purple hair and nose rings -- like the Antifa goons?
BTW, ILoveIvermectin ...
You posted a stupid article from CBS (of all places) ... without understanding what the actual allegations are.
That is low effort.
Do better.
SPLC is accused of (a) funding LEFT-wing groups, (b) INFORMANTS of right-wing groups (where the informants might even be fake plants and not really even believing anything about the group they infiltrate), and (c) engaging in bank and wire fraud while doing so.
I would add, that since they are a law firm and they built their nasty organization off of suing people they hate, then those informants were LIKELY put there (and paid well) to gather intel so the SPLC would have insider info for the purpose of yet more lawsuits.
Meanwhile, they were also ACTUALLY FUNDING left-wing organizations (or maybe they used some infiltrators there, too).
THAT is what is really going on here.
Umm ... when are we gonna get RID of the income tax, which Trump has hinted at, but has nothing to push the idea beyond a comment or two?