1
MAG768720 1 point ago +1 / -0

Viruses do not exist. Period.

However, that does not mean people do not get sick.

It also does not mean doctors and "scientists" actually KNOW that viruses are not real. This knowledge was only discovered in April 2021, when virologist Stefan Lanka proved it.

It also does not mean that there are not psychopaths, like Fauci, and idiots, like Fauci, who might have ulterior motives to create harmful things aimed at people -- cuz that's what idiots and psychopaths do.

It is also important to understand DUAL PURPOSE research. The regulations allow for any money coming from goverment to be used for (a) the stated intended purpose for which the money was given, or (b) ANY OTHER USE that is of interest to the lab ("dual purpose").

There are 3 possibilities:

(1) The people giving the government money and receiving it do NOT know that viruses are not real. Most doctors NEVER read ANY research on their own. They only read the pretty brochures that the pretty pharma sales reps give them -- with lies made up by the pharma marketing department. The same is true for MOST so-called "scientists." Today's "science" has largely become a circle jerk of "peer reviewed" nonsense where the "peers" don't bother actually reviewing, much less understanding, what they approve. It all comes down to: Will I get PAID if I say yes or if I say no? Government money has corrupted science. So, MAYBE these people don't know there are no viruses. In which case, they are trying to create a harmful virus (still, an evil thing to do), but can't. Meanwhile, they are getting rich circle jerking each other.

(2) Maybe they DO know that viruses do not exist, or at least realize that none of their efforts ever accomplish their evil goal, so they are skipping the "why can't I make this work?" phase, and just going straight to the "cash the checks and get rich" stage.

(3) Or, they are using DUAL PURPOSE for its intended purpose -- which is, using government money for "gain of function" and really diverting it to creating man-made bioweapons, such as Covid clot shots.

As long as people fall for the virus scam, there are not going to be many people reseraching to figure it all out.

Covid does not exist. People do get sick, however. "Cold and flu" season was simply rebranded as "Covid" for the purpose of terrorizing the People, for control and money. IOW: It's much worse than we previously thought, due to evil people doing evil things.

"Cold and flu" season is nothing more than a time for detox. Usually happens in Winter months, when the Sun is low in the sky, Vitamin D levels are therefore naturally low, and the toxicity most of us build up within our bodies due to living in a toxic environment (food, EMF's, etc.) have reached a point that our body triggers a detox.

Annual thing. People who get it at a different time of the year are most likely even more toxic than usual, and go through the process when the body has had enough.

IMO, the best detox is a FULL DRY FAST. Eat and drink NOTHING (including water) for 2 or 3 days. I have personally done this the last 2 times, and the body clears in a couple of days. Been my experience, anyway.

Almost everything we think of as illness is actually a toxic condition within the body, due most likely to poor nutrition and/or toxicity we endure in the modern world (electricity, EMF, chemicals in our clothes, homes, cars, cleaning supplies, shampoo, you name it). Bad food & drink is #1 way to bad health, which leads to toxic condition, which leads to body detoxing, which we falsely label as "illness." It is an illness of sorts, but not the way we think about it.

8
MAG768720 8 points ago +8 / -0

They've been trying, but few are paying attention anymore.

They tried monkeypox.

They tried bringing back small pox and polio in New York.

I just heard some dumb broad talking about a "resurgence" of 8 measles cases.

So ... they are trying, but nobody is listening.

5
MAG768720 5 points ago +5 / -0

US Dollar is perceived as the world's reserve currency due to the strength and power of the US military. Period.

It is the "Petrodollar" agreement that Nixon put into place when he destroyed the gold-backed US Dollar (which had been the world's reserve currency due to the Bretton Woods agreement in 1945, post-WWII).

Keep an eye on the Russian Ruble (relative value to the US Dollar -- or RUB/USD currency pair). The Ruble crashed in February 2022 on the invasion of Ukraine, bottomed on March 7, 2022, and has been rising versus the USD ever since.

Currently, it is the only currency in the world showing strength against the USD. When (not if, but when) the USD starts to tank, something else will rise in its place.

Will it be the Ruble?

  • Chinese Yuan is crashing
  • Japanese Yen is crashing
  • Other Asian currencies are crashing
  • Euro is crashing
  • British Pound is crashing
  • But ... Russian Ruble ... going up? Hmm ...

Now that I think about it some more ...

Is it possible that the US government will try to impose a block against Americans investing in Russian assets, including the Ruble, even if it strengthens against a declining US Dollar?

Just a thought.

5
MAG768720 5 points ago +5 / -0

... and ... NOBODY will ever loan anybody any money.

Interest is a fee for the RISK of loaning the money and possibly never getting it back.

It is legit.

What is NOT legit is a MONOPOLY on creating money from nothing, and a government that can spend any amount for anything.

3
MAG768720 3 points ago +3 / -0

The problem with your analogy is that even if there were a fixed amount of currency, there is never a fixed amount of wealth.

Some people are more productive than other people. Most people are productive to some degree, and their productivity creates ever more wealth.

One of the individuals on your desert island might be more productive at acquiring things that others would like to have: fish, coconuts, wild boar, palm leaves, whatever.

When that happens, a fixed rate of "money" (or "currency" which is what you are talking about) can be sliced up into more bits. My 10 fish that I used to sell for $1 can now sell for 50 cents because I was so productive with my new technique in fishing that I caught more than I expected. Therefore, the value of each fish is less due to an over supply, and that over supply is due to increased productivity.

This increased productivity drives prices down, and increases the value of each dollar, relative to the wealth. So there is no reason to "print more money" -- unless you want to steal the wealth of others -- since total wealth is always increasing, due to productivity always expanding.

The BIG problem that most modern day "economists" have is they do not understand that human productivity is the main driver of a prosperous society.

It is NOT consumption. It is productivity. This is WHY an economy gets destroyed by any form of socialism. Socialism/communism (same thing, ultimately) destroys economies because it disincentivizes productivity, and productivity generates wealth. A lack of productivity reduces wealth.

Money is just a scorecard. It is not the essence of wealth itself.

Central banking and centrally-planned government destroy wealth to benefit the insiders, but they produce nothing of value for society as a whole. They are merely parasites.

6
MAG768720 6 points ago +6 / -0

What I don’t understand is why the USD is so strong compared to foreign currency right now.

Flight to safety.

All stock markets, worldwide, are bearish (Brazil holding up better than most).

Real estate has entered a bear market (sellers lowering prices, and still not selling).

Precious metals (manipulated, but still ...) are bearish (silver holding up better than gold).

Bond market is bearish (interest rates are at 10-year highs, which is killing the real estate market).

With nowhere else to go, money is flowing into the relative safety (perceived) of the US Dollar.

Interestingly, the only currency in the world that is showing some strength versus the US Dollar is the Russian Ruble.

5
MAG768720 5 points ago +5 / -0

Next time you get one, let me know. I will tell you what I would do.

Now that I have had this experience, I see the sham that it is, and I would do things a little differently that would REALLY call them out -- but do so within the rules THEY are supposed to follow.

6
MAG768720 6 points ago +6 / -0

It was very interesting.

The system is so corrupt that they almost never follow the law (Constitution, Supreme Court decisions, etc.).

  • Traffic ticket for speeding.
  • This is considered a crime -- no jail time, but still a crime (officially).
  • The city attorney failed to file a "charging order" against me in the court file.
  • The only thing in the court file was a summary statement, unsigned and with no individual claiming they had created it.
  • This meant there was no "notice and opportunity" for me to defend myself, since there was no official document, signed by anyone, claiming that I had done anything wrong.
  • Even the traffic ticket itself was not in the court file. Just this summary sheet was.
  • Also, this summary sheet was never given to me at all. I only knew about it because I took time out of my day to go to the Clerk of Records to ask for all documents in the file. This was the only piece of paper.
  • This meant that I was not officially charged with anything. A traffic ticket is not an official charge -- just a summons (and it isn't even that, in reality).

So, on the first court hearing ("arraignment," supposedly), I verbally said that I motion the court to dismiss for lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction. There must be a charging document against someone, and it must be served on them, so they can respond. Again, a traffic ticket is NOT enough.

This is basic American law -- Due Process requires "Notice and Opportunity" be given a "defendant."

The traffic court "judge" was an idiot. She went ballistic, screaming and yelling. But it didn't mean anything. She denied my motion WITHOUT any input from the city attorney.

This is a BIG violation of Due Process. Once Subject Matter Jurisdiction is challenged, it MUST be (a) proven (b) on the record (c) by the party claiming that the court has it. A judge CANNOT arbitrarily claim to have SMJ.

In this case, NOBODY had claimed that THIS court had SMJ. There was only a piece of paper in the file -- a summary sheet, not signed by anyone, with nobody's name attached, and no penalty of perjury (or attorney's penalty of sanctions). Just a print out that some clerk did on a computer.

So, the "judge" denied my motion and set a trial date and time.

Fine.

When I showed up, a different judge had the case. While I was waiting around for a trial to start, I was told that the prosecutor "had a scheduling conflict" and could not proceed. Therefore, the case was dismissed.

I KNOW for a FACT that this is not true. The ONLY thing they do ALL DAY is process traffic ticket cases to collect money.

They will NEVER admit that a non-attorney is right about the LAW ... but they WILL do what they are legally required to do IF they think not doing so could cause a problem for themselves. In this case, I WOULD have not only appealed, but filed complaints with the judicial board and possibly filed a federal lawsuit for violation of rights (Due Process). I doubt they want a federal judge to take a serious look into how they railroad people on a daily basis, all to collect money in an unlawful way.

They got the hint and dismissed the case.

I believe they "cut corners" on Due Process ALL THE TIME because it is easier and saves them time. MOST people don't know what to do about it, and MOST attorneys play the game because it benefits the entire legal industry (plus, law schools are just as bad as medical schools when it comes to failing to teach the WHOLE truth about the subject, and instead directing the students towards beliefs that benefit the system -- like "the Consitution is a living document," and other nonsense).

Traffic court is the perfect opportunity to challenge them on their failure to follow the law, because they do it all the time. It is about collecting money, and has NOTHING to do with "public safety" or "upholding the law." Those claims are merely for show.

4
MAG768720 4 points ago +4 / -0

Pretty good evidence that the Russian military action was primarily to defend the provinces that wanted to vote to leave Ukraine.

Imagine what the Ukraine government would do to them if they had such a vote with no Russian troops to defend them.

13
MAG768720 13 points ago +13 / -0

My position would be:

  • I am a volunteer, not an employee.
  • As a volunteer, employment policies do not apply.
  • Because a position of election worker is authorized by the State (assuming there is such a law/regulation), the laws of the State apply.
  • No State may violate my right to prohibit a search of my person, except upon a warrant signed by a judge, whereupon some individual attests under penalty of perjury that there is probable cause to believe a crime has been committed.
  • Because no warrant has been issued, and because I do not consent to a search of my person via drug test, I do not agree to any drug test as a condition of my volunteer status of election worker.
  • Furthermore, coercing me or penalizing me, including refusing my volunteer status as election worker, is a felony under federal law, 18 USC 241, Conspiracy Against Rights:

If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State ... in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution ... of the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same ... They shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both;

  • In addition to felony charges brought against you, you can be sued in your personal capacity for violating my rights, 42 USC 1983, Deprivation of Rights:

Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State ... subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution ... shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity

Stir up some trouble, and see what happens.

I recently had a traffic ticket dismissed because I challenged the authority of the court, and they couldn't figure out what to do other than dismiss. Note: They will NEVER agree that you are right, but in the end they should agree to do what you want, which in this case is be a volunteer election worker.

NOTE: If they fight back, there will come a point where they will make a claim that a drug test is "necessary" for some [arbitrary and undefined] reason. At that point, you tell them they must provide proof that there have been situations in the past were a non-drug tested volunteer election worker has caused harm to someone. They won't be able to do it, which proves their drug test is arbitrary and capritious, which means they are violating your rights.

2
MAG768720 2 points ago +4 / -2

We are all taught history from people who have an agenda. Some of those people have an agenda of promoting truth, but many have a hidden agenda to push propaganda.

In more recent years, we have all been exposed to ideas that are contrary to what we were previously taught. That requires us to consider the evidence for multiple viewpoints, and use our critical thinking skills to do our best to figure out what the truth is.

TRUTH is our goal, right?

Wherever the evidence leads us is where we should go.

"He who fails to learn from history is condemned to repeat it." -- George Santayana

Problem is, if we are lied to about history, then we cannot learn the valuable lessons from it, and that puts us into a position of being condemned to repeat the mistakes of the past.

Consider:

  • We know that the Bible, written almost 2,000 years ago, tells us that there are individuals in society who claim to be jews but are not. How would this be known back then, if it were not true? Just made up fantasy? If so, then future events would not have played out as they did. This points to it being true.

  • The Talmud was written around 1,500 years ago. The Talmud is a key element of the Jewish religion. Even jews who claim they have never read it are still influenced by it. They are influenced by other jews in their synagogues who do agree with the Talmud.

  • The Talmud teaches that non-jews are not human, have no human rights, and should be treated as nothing more than slaves. This is THE (not one of, but the ONLY) book that teaches jews how to live as jews. Again, even jews who do not read it and do not believe it are still influence by it due to other jews pushing the Talmudic agenda.

  • We have dozens (probably hundreds or thousands, when all languages are considered) of rabbis and other jewish leaders pushing Talmudic teachings. We have orthodox jews on video making statements that they agree with Talmudic teachings.

  • This is a serious problem for any non-jew.

  • It also becomes a problem for jews, because as more and more non-jews wake up to the fact that the jewish religion pushes maniacal teachings that are aimed at their destruction, non-jews naturally rebel against such filth.

  • Remember, that book was written 1,500+ years ago.

  • Around 1,000+ years ago, the little kindom of Khazaria was created. Modern history books do not mention it. 99% of non-jews never learn about Khazaria -- at least, not as they are growing up. Why is that?

  • As the story goes, the Khazarians adopted judiasm as their religion, but in name only. They continued to practice their satanic ways. But since they had the Talmud's teachings to utilize as jews, is it REALLY so different from "normal" judiasm? Is sacraficing children, for example, against Talmudic teachings? No, not if the murdered child is non-jew.

  • Naturally, the communites nearby to the Khazarians developed a deep distrust and hatred for the Khazars -- due to the Khazar's ACTIONS, not merely because they disagreed with their beliefs.

  • The story then goes that the Khazars had to bail out of central Asia and disburse, due to everyone hating their guts.

  • This part of the story is consistent with both the Bible and the fact that jews have been kicked out of numerous societies over the past 1,000 years -- DUE TO THEIR DISGUSTING ACTIONS TO HARM THE SOCIETY THEY LIVED IN.

  • Societies kicking out jews over 1,000 years is an interesting timeline: soon after the Talmud was written, problems showed up.

  • Karl Marx was a jew, and his evil communist ideology had taken hold in some sectors of society by the turn of the 20th century.

  • Jews tried to overthrow the government of Russia in 1905. That attempted coup failed.

  • Jews tried again in 1917, and this time they were successful, including the brutal torture and murder of the czar and his family. They took over Russia in the guise of communism.

  • Around that same time, jews in Germany were secretly plotting with jews in England and the USA to commit treason against their own (German) people by getting the USA into WWI, since the Germans were winning that war. The result was the Balfor Declaration, which promised Palestine to the jews, if England could turn things around and win the war.

  • USA enters the war, England wins, England takes Palestine from the Ottoman Empire, and jews begin migrating to Palestine and disrupting the people living there.

  • After WWI, the Germans discover the treason that the German jews engaged in to stab them in the back. They reacted by developing a distrust, and some a hatred, towards the people who committed treason against them.

  • Hitler was one of those who saw the back stabbing as treason, and vowed to do something about it.

  • Meanwhile, the same jews who had recently overthrown Russia were infiltrating and attempting to overthrow Germany, as well.

  • Poland was being run by jews who were committing rape, murder, and various atrocities against the ethnic Germans living there (the borders had changed due to the treaty after WWI).

  • The world economy was in a depression following WWI and the roaring 20's, but nowhere in the western world was it worse than in Germany. They never had a roaring 20's. They only had hyperinflation and misery.

  • Berlin became the porn capital, prostitution capital, and misery capital of Europe. The people were starving due to the sanctions put on them after the war, and jews were infiltrating the government, media, business, and universities.

  • Hitler was seen as the man fighting against the jewish machine. Jews had a long history (1,000+ years) of destroying societies -- because of Talmudic teachings -- and the German people were experiencing this horrible situation, just as the Russians had been enduring for a decade or more.

  • Hitler comes to power, and the worlds' jews ("World Jewry" they called it) ... DECLARED WAR ON GERMANY in 1933.

  • Jews of the world got together to boycott German goods and do everything they could to destroy Germany.

  • Hitler baned usury, which was destructive to the banks, run by jews.

  • Hitler banned the prostitution and porn industry, also run by jews.

  • Germans burned books -- porn and filth books -- published by jews.

  • Hitler made a deal with jewish leadership to ship the jews out of Germany, and ideally out of Europe, and off to Palestine where they said they wanted to be, anyway. It was a win-win deal. The jewish leadership agreed to it. And thousands of jews did move to Palestine. Getting them to go to Palestine was the "final solution." Just get them OUT, so they could not cause more problems within.

  • Hitler was attempting to kick the communists out of Germany because they were trying to do a Russia 2.0 in Germany. They not only were traitors from WWI, but also seditionists in the 1930's.

  • Hitler had many of these communist leaders, who were mostly jews, arrested and put into prison camps, Not all jews went to prison camps, and many jews served in the German military, including high-ranking officers.

  • Hitler's chauffeur and bodyguard was a jew.

  • When a jew walked into the German embassy in Paris and murdered a German diplomat, the German people reacted by throwing bricks into the windows of jew-owned businesses in Germany. But then Hitler put a stop to the violence.

  • When jews in Poland were murdering ethnic Germans in Poland, Hitler demanded they stopped. When they did not stop, Hitler appealed to two dozen nations in Europe and the rest of the world (pre-United Nations) to side with him to get them to stop. Nobody would do anything about it.

  • So, Hitler gave the Polish government an ultimatum: Stop, or we will come in with our military and make you stop.

  • When the Polish government told him to fuck off, he sent in his military and ended the genocide within 48 hours.

  • THAT is when Churchill pushed the "war" button and started WWII.

  • The prison camps for communists and jews who were engaged in war against Germay from the inside were turned into prisoner of war camps, until the war was over.

  • There were NO gas chambers. Hence, there was no "Holocaust."

  • This lie about the Holocaust MUST be openly discussed, so that we can learn from the REAL history.

  • I don't like everything Hitler did. He is not my "hero." But he did great things for the German people, and he did NOT do the horrible things to "innocent jews" like he is portrayed to have done in the jew-controlled media and fantasy called Hollywood.

  • The Talmud teaches jews that it is GOOD TO LIE, if it promotes the cause of judiasm. This principle must ALWAYS be kept in mind, when reading or listening to jewish opinion -- including the lies that they told about the Holocaust (some of whom are on the record that they made up their stories BECAUSE it was "important" for the cause).

So much history has been hidden -- on purpose.

That is what "occult" means: hidden knowledge.

And much of what we are told is history is actually a made-up lie. (Think: Covid)

If we don't learn and discuss history, we will never learn important lessons from history, so that our future can be better.

Not ALL jews are bad people. But their religion teaches VERY DESTRUCTIVE ideas, even if they themselves pretend to ignore it.

It is not even jews, per se. It is the Talmudic ideas that are evil, and any other ideas that have a similar concept. The concept is that "WE can do anything we want, and YOU will be our slave." One does not need to be jewish to have that menality, and not all jews have it.

But there ARE people in this world who do.

THOSE people are the enemy of all other people.

However, ALL jews are influenced by these evil teachings, whether they realize it or not. If they have any religious aspect of their life, there will be other jews who influence them to some degree. Even though there are many good people who are jews, there are many other jews who are not good people. And the Talmud's concepts are the primary reason these people are the way they are.

The good ones should learn about history, just like the rest of us need to do, and then should SPEAK OUT against those jews (and non-jews) who push these evil ideas.

TRUTH is what matters.

We should have an OPEN discussion where people can present ideas and debate those ideas, so that we all have a chance at trying to figure out what the TRUTH is.

ANY attempt to censor such a discusion is itself ... EVIL.

1
MAG768720 1 point ago +2 / -1

We are all taught history from people who have an agenda. Some of those people have an agenda of promoting truth, but many have a hidden agenda to push propaganda.

In more recent years, we have all been exposed to ideas that are contrary to what we were previously taught. That requires us to consider the evidence for multiple viewpoints, and use our critical thinking skills to do our best to figure out what the truth is.

TRUTH is our goal, right?

Wherever the evidence leads us is where we should go.

"He who fails to learn from history is condemned to repeat it." -- George Santayana

Problem is, if we are lied to about history, then we cannot learn the valuable lessons from it, and that puts us into a position of being condemned to repeat the mistakes of the past.

Consider:

  • We know that the Bible, written almost 2,000 years ago, tells us that there are individuals in society who claim to be jews but are not. How would this be known back then, if it were not true? Just made up fantasy? If so, then future events would not have played out as they did. This points to it being true.

  • The Talmud was written around 1,500 years ago. The Talmud is a key element of the Jewish religion. Even jews who claim they have never read it are still influenced by it. They are influenced by other jews in their synagogues who do agree with the Talmud.

  • The Talmud teaches that non-jews are not human, have no human rights, and should be treated as nothing more than slaves. This is THE (not one of, but the ONLY) book that teaches jews how to live as jews. Again, even jews who do not read it and do not believe it are still influence by it due to other jews pushing the Talmudic agenda.

  • We have dozens (probably hundreds or thousands, when all languages are considered) of rabbis and other jewish leaders pushing Talmudic teachings. We have orthodox jews on video making statements that they agree with Talumdic teachings.

  • This is a serious problem for any non-jew.

  • It also becomes a problem for jews, because as more and more non-jews wake up to the fact that the jewish religion pushes maniacal teachings that are aimed at their destruction, non-jews naturally rebel against such filth.

  • Remember, that book was written 1,500+ years ago.

  • Around 1,000+ years ago, the little kindom of Khazaria was created. Modern history books do not mention it. 99% of non-jews never learn about Khazaria -- at least, not as they are growing up. Why is that?

  • As the story goes, the Khazarians adopted judiasm as their religion, but in name only. They continued to practice their satanic ways. But since they had the Talmud's teachings to utilize as jews, is it REALLY so different from "normal" judiasm? Is sacraficing children, for example, against Talmudic teachings? No, not if the murdered child is non-jew.

  • Naturally, the communites nearby to the Khazarians developed a deep distrust and hatred for the Khazars -- due to the Khazar's ACTIONS, not merely because they disagreed with their beliefs.

  • The story then goes that the Khazars had to bail out of central Asia and disburse, due to everyone hating their guts.

  • This part of the story is consistent with both the Bible and the fact that jews have been kicked out of numerous societies over the past 1,000 years -- DUE TO THEIR DISGUSTING ACTIONS TO HARM THE SOCIETY THEY LIVED IN.

  • Societies kicking out jews over 1,000 years is an interesting timeline: soon after the Talmud was written, problems showed up.

  • Karl Marx was a jew, and his evil communist ideology had taken hold in some sectors of society by the turn of the 20th century.

  • Jews tried to overthrow the government of Russia in 1905. That attempted coup failed.

  • Jews tried again in 1917, and this time they were successful, including the brutal torture and murder of the czar and his family. They took over Russia in the guise of communism.

  • Around that same time, jews in Germany were secretly plotting with jews in England and the USA to commit treason against their own (German) people by getting the USA into WWI, since the Germans were winning that war. The result was the Balfor Declaration, which promised Palestine to the jews, if England could turn things around and win the war.

  • USA enters the war, England wins, England takes Palestine from the Ottoman Empire, and jews begin migrating to Palestine and disrupting the people living there.

  • After WWI, the Germans discover the treason that the German jews engaged in to stab them in the back. They reacted by developing a distrust, and some a hatred, towards the people who committed treason against them.

  • Hitler was one of those who saw the back stabbing as treason, and vowed to do something about it.

  • Meanwhile, the same jews who had recently overthrown Russia were infiltrating and attempting to overthrow Germany, as well.

  • Poland was being run by jews who were committing rape, murder, and various atrocities against the ethnic Germans living there (the borders had changed due to the treaty after WWI).

  • The world economy was in a depression following WWI and the roaring 20's, but nowhere in the western world was it worse than in Germany. They never had a roaring 20's. They only had hyperinflation and misery.

  • Berlin became the porn capital, prostitution capital, and misery capital of Europe. The people were starving due to the sanctions put on them after the war, and jews were infiltrating the government, media, business, and universities.

  • Hitler was seen as the man fighting against the jewish machine. Jews had a long history (1,000+ years) of destroying societies -- because of Talmudic teachings" -- and the German people were experiencing this horrible situation, just as the Russians had been enduring for a decade or more.

  • Hitler comes to power, and the worlds' jews ("World Jewry" they called it) ... DECLARED WAR ON GERMANY in 1933.

  • Jews of the world got together to boycott German goods and do everything they could to destroy Germany.

  • Hitler baned usury, which was destructive to the banks, run by jews.

  • Hitler banned the prostitution and porn industry, also run by jews.

  • Germans burned books -- porn and filth books -- published by jews.

  • Hitler made a deal with jewish leadership to ship the jews out of Germany, and ideally out of Europe, and off to Palestine where they said they wanted to be, anyway. It was a win-win deal. The jewish leadership agreed to it. And thousands of jews did move to Palestine. Getting them to go to Palestine was the "final solution." Just get them OUT, so they could not cause more problems within.

  • Hitler was attempting to kick the communists out of Germany because they were trying to do a Russia 2.0 in Germany. They not only were traitors from WWI, but also seditionists in the 1930's.

  • Hitler had many of these communist leaders, who were mostly jews, arrested and put into prison camps, Not all jews went to prison camps, and many jews served in the German military, including high-ranking officers.

  • Hitler's chauffeur and bodyguard was a jew.

  • When a jew walked into the German embassy in Paris and murdered a German diplomat, the German people reacted by throwing bricks into the windows of jew-owned businesses in Germany. But then Hitler put a stop to the violence.

  • When jews in Poland were murdering ethnic Germans in Poland, Hitler demanded they stopped. When they did not stop, Hitler appealed to two dozen nations in Europe and the rest of the world (pre-United Nations) to side with him to get them to stop. Nobody would do anything about it.

  • So, Hitler gave the Polish government an ultimatum: Stop, or we will come in with our military and make you stop.

  • When the Polish government told him to fuck off, he sent in his military and ended the genocide within 48 hours.

  • THAT is when Churchill pushed the "war" button and started WWII.

  • The prison camps for communists and jews who were engaged in war against Germay from the inside were turned into prisoner of war camps, until the war was over.

  • There were NO gas chambers. Hence, there was no "Holocaust."

  • This lie about the Holocaust MUST be openly discussed, so that we can learn from the REAL history.

  • I don't like everything Hitler did. He is not my "hero." But he did great things for the German people, and he did NOT do the horrible things to "innocent jews" like he is portrayed to have done in the jew-controlled media and fantasy called Hollywood.

  • The Talmud teaches jews that it is GOOD TO LIE, if it promotes the cause of judiasm. This principle must ALWAYS be kept in mind, when reading or listening to jewish opinion -- including the lies that they told about the Holocaust (some of whom are on the record that they made up their stories BECAUSE it was "important" for the cause).

So much history has been hidden -- on purpose.

That is what "occult" mean: hidden knowledge.

And much of what we are told is history is actually a made-up lie. (Think: Covid)

If we don't learn and discuss history, we will never learn important lessons from history, so that our future can be better.

Not ALL jews are bad people. But their religion teaches VERY DESTRUCTIVE ideas, even if they themselves pretend to ignore it.

It is not even jews, per se. It is the Talmudic ideas that are evil, and any other ideas that have a similar concept. The concept is that "WE can do anything we want, and YOU will be our slave." One does not need to be jewish to have that menality, and not all jews have it.

But there ARE people in this world who do.

THOSE people are the enemy of all other people.

However, ALL jews are influenced by these evil teachings, whether they realize it or not. If they have any religious aspect of their life, there will be other jews who influence them to some degree. Even though there are many good people who are jews, there are many other jews who are not good people. And the Talmud's concepts are the primary reason these people are the way they are.

The good ones should learn about history, just like the rest of us need to do, and then should SPEAK OUT against those jews (and non-jews) who push these evil ideas.

TRUTH is what matters.

We should have an OPEN discussion where people can present ideas and debate those ideas, so that we all have a chance at trying to figure out what the TRUTH is.

ANY attempt to censor such a discusion is itself ... EVIL.

1
MAG768720 1 point ago +2 / -1

I agree that subjectivism is a primary problem.

The world (and truth about the world) is necessarily objective, not subjective.

The commies want to push subjectivism because it leaves people without any principles.

4
MAG768720 4 points ago +4 / -0

When you pursue Truth, you have the same destination as everyone else.

Yes, but WHY do some people recognize that Truth should always be the focus, while other people not only dismiss such an idea -- and even seem to prefer to live according to lies?

8
MAG768720 8 points ago +8 / -0

I don't think Free Will is the concept you described in your OP.

Free Will is the ability to make a decision to do or not do something.

But you are talking about critical thinking.

Free Will might or might not be a result of critical thinking, depending on the person and circumstance.

But they are two different things.

Everybody has Free Will.

Everybody also has the human ability to engage in critical thinking, unless they have a damaged brain for some reason.

But many of the non-brain damaged people who have the ability to engage in critical thinking, choose (Free Will) to NOT engage in critical thinking, for some reason, and instead they defer to what other people tell them to think and do.

Why THAT occurs is what we should be exploring.

Propaganda is powerful. Over the past 2 years, we have witnessed one of the most powerful propaganda efforts in human history. We can even go back 6 years and add in the anti-Trump propaganda along with the Covid propaganda.

Many people fell for the propaganda, but not all. Why is THAT?

The so-called "Big Lie" seems to work on a lot of people. Even the big lie of the "Big Lie" is ongoing propaganda. Joseph Goebbels, in writing about the "Big Lie" said that it can only last as long as the people can continue to be deceived by their own government. The fact that he was talking about the British government, and especially Winston Churchill, is hidden by today's propaganda claiming that he was bragging about what the Germans could do to their own people. No, he was talking about how the British fooled their own people and the world through their lies about the Germans.

So ... why do so many people fall for it and NOT question it, even when someone draws their attention to it?

The people still wearing face masks are doing it of their own Free Will, even though they have been deceived. But WHY are they STILL deceived after all this time? Lack of WILL to engage in critical thinking. You could say that is their inability to follow "Free Will," but WHY do they chose THIS (critical thinking) as the line drawn in the sand that they will not cross?

They demonstrate Free Will in most aspects of their life -- but NOT rational thought when it comes to questioning the people they perceive to be "authority."

It is a SLAVE mentality. WHY do they have it?

5
MAG768720 5 points ago +7 / -2

I think that there should be a certain S-M-A-L-L (small!) tax that everyone pays for MINIMAL, BASIC healthcare for extremely poor people.

Wishful thinking. It will NEVER stay "S-M-A-L-L" as long as government employees get to run it. NEVER.

Just 40 or 50 years ago, there were free clinics for poor people. Doctors and nurses gave a few hours per month to help out at the free clinic. As recently as the 1950's and 1960's, doctors made house calls.

The private sector can, does and DID provide health care to poor people. But once the government got control of it -- first via Medicare in 1965, and then through mandated HMO's in 1970 -- it was only a matter of time until the free clinics went away and a house call was a never-happens event.

Get the government OUT of health care, and the free market will solve the problems.

smears his germs all over everything he touches ... can end up getting your niece sick

Germ Theory is a crock of shit, with ZERO proof to back it up.

Today, government controls almost ALL "health care" (if you can even call it that these days) and "medical research" (if you can call propganda "research"). This is the ONLY reason that alternative ideas are not funded and debated in society.

When government takes over, it is no longer a free society.

And it hurts EVERYONE.

We are a social race of beings, and we have a degree of interconnectedness that you can't get away from.

True, but Germ Theory is STILL a crock of shit.

So for the sake of PUBLIC HYGIENE

Wrong, because Germ Theory is a crock of shit.

But I think that tax, and that level of health coverage, should be extremely minimal

You are dreaming, not being realistic. The income tax started out with a maximum rate of 6%. Within a few years, the top rate was 77%, and in less than 20 years, it was over 90%.

Government does NOT stay small.

PERIOD.

That should be one of the BIG lessons of the past few years.

It's one of the only things I'm still somewhat socialist about

That's a problem that you should deal with.

Those types of ideas ... "we can just keep THIS little itty bit of socialism" ... is what is destroying America.

Socialism/communism is EVIL ... because it violates the basic principles of human rights, and destroys people's lives.

You can't be a little bit pregnant, and you can't have a little bit of socialism.

5
MAG768720 5 points ago +5 / -0

The U.S. Circuit Court for Appeals [f]or the District of Columbia said it was dismissing the case because the Jan. 6 committee withdrew the subpoena to the RNC seeking records of its dealings with a digital fund-raising vendor Salesforce.

"The RNC's appeal has become moot," the appeals court ruled in dismissing the case.

The fake J6 committee issued a subpeona (for which they have no authority), and then withdrew it. Court said the withdrawal means there is no subpeona. Case dismissed.

The right decision.

3
MAG768720 3 points ago +3 / -0

You are mixing two concepts that cannot be mixed together: Logic and government.

16
MAG768720 16 points ago +18 / -2

I read her diary as a kid

When you were young and impressionable ... and had not yet come to the realization that sometimes ... adults LIE.

15
MAG768720 15 points ago +17 / -2

Where did you get that info? From a pro-jew source?

Consider this source:

The story contained within Anne Frank’s diary, that world famous testimony to the sufferings of a Jewish family during World War II, may or may not be a true story as far as it goes (we will never know for sure), but it is one hundred percent certain that the diary that was published and subsequently became a worldwide best seller was not written by Anne Frank herself.

Setting aside the pen ink for a moment, the handwriting in the "official" diary does not seem to be from Anne. See the images.

it is strange is it not that the latter example purporting to be her original diary is written in ballpoint pen?

Written in ball point pen -- means it could not have been written by Anne.

‘The Diary of Anne Frank’ was first published in 1952 and immediately became a bestseller.

An interesting question to consider is why the trial involving the father of Anne Frank, bearing directly on the authenticity of this book has never been officially reported by the overwhelmingly Zionist media? But I think we may all guess the answer to that?

Oh ... there was a TRIAL specifically to find out IF the diary was authentic?

And ... the (((media))) never mentions this trial? Hmm ... now, why would that be?

In royalties alone, Otto Frank profited greatly from the sale of this book, purporting to depict events in the tragic life of his family, but is it fact, fiction or propaganda or a combination of all of these? It certainly claims to be the truth but to what degree does it appeal to the emotions through misrepresentation? It was certainly convenient for Otto Frank that he was the only family member to survive the war – and I mean that in the sense of there being no-one left alive to corroborate or deny the story and in no way to diminish the anguish he must have suffered at the loss of his entire family.

Anne’s re-hashed diaries were written in ball-point pen (confirmed in Otto Frank’s court hearing) ...

Ah ... maybe THAT is the reason.

But, let's see what Otto Frank, Anne's father, was like.

The Franks were upper-class German Jews, both parents emanating from wealthy families. As children, Otto and his siblings lived on the exclusive Meronstrasse in Frankfurt and Otto attended a private preparatory school and also the Lessing Gymnasium, the most expensive school in Frankfurt. Upon leaving school, Otto attended Heidelberg University from whence he eventually graduated.

The Frank’s family business included banking, management of the springs at Bad Soden a famous spa and the manufacture of cough sweets. Anne’s mother, born Edith Holländer, was the daughter of a wealthy manufacturing family and in 1934 Otto and family moved to Amsterdam where he bought a spice business, Opekta, which manufactured pectin, a form of gelatine used in the making of household jellies.

Wealthy. Businessman.

In May 1940, after the Germans occupied Amsterdam, Otto remained in the city and he and his company entered into a lucrative contract with the German Wehrmacht ...

So, Otto was not only NOT persecuted for being a jew, but he did BUSINESS with the German MILITARY -- Hitler's military.

From 1939 to 1944, Otto sold pectin to the German army to be used as a food preservative, a disinfectant balm for wounds, a thickener for increasing blood volume in blood transfusions and also as an emulsifier of petroleum to be used in the manufacture of fire bombs and flame-throwers.

Making $$$$$ ... working WITH the Germans.

However, by supplying the Wehrmacht, Otto Frank became, in the eyes of his Dutch friends and neighbours, a Nazi collaborator. None of this aspect of the official story of course is ever mentioned or even alluded to.

Ah ... THIS is the "persecution" that Otto would later write about, faking that it was written by his daughter. He was persecuted, indeed, but NOT by the Germans. Only by his own friends.

Remember ... the JEWS DECLARED WORLD WAR ON GERMANY in 1933.

ANY jew who was seen as helping the Germans were considered traitors by OTHER JEWS.

Hmm ... why don't jews talk about THIS part of the story? I wonder why ...

The purported diary begins on 12th June, 1942 continuing through to the 5th December 1942.

Her real diary covered just a few months of her daily life.

Otto claimed, she rewrote her diaries for the second time in 1944. In this second edition, the new writer, Anne or whoever it was, changed, rearranged and occasionally combined entries of various dates.

New edition. New writer.

Anne’s re-hashed diaries were written in ball-point pen (confirmed in Otto Frank’s court hearing) which was extremely enterprising of her since such a device did not exist in 1944 ...

In 1944, the German authorities in occupied Holland discovered that Otto Frank’s company had been extensively defrauding them through their Wehrmacht contracts and subsequently the police then raided his offices where during a thorough search the annex was discovered and the eight occupants were sent initially to the Westerbork transit camp and forced to perform manual labour. Otto was later sent to Auschwitz and Anne, her sister Margo and her mother subsequently died in one of the frequent outbreaks of typhus in Bergen-Belsen two weeks before liberation by the Allies.

And ... THAT is why Otto Frank was arrested. He was a suspected criminal.

His family were potentially his accomplises. Had to sort out who was who, especially during a time of war.

Note: Anne did not die from gas. She died from illness.

Also note: Otto did not die at all during his time at the "infamous" Auschwitz. If there was ever a jew that the Germans would want to "gas to death," it would be one they suspected of defrauding their military. But no. He was not put to death. Nobody was put to death via gas chambers, because there were no gas chambers. It was all made up after the war. See Fred Leutcher's first-hand investigation.

In 1945, after being liberated from German custody, Otto returned to Amsterdam, where he claimed he found Anne’s diary cleverly hidden in the rafters of the annex.

Convenient, huh? Note again: Otto did not die at Auschwitz, and Anne would have been freed, as well, if she did not die from illness.

Otto took what he claimed were Anne’s letters and notes, edited them into a book, which he then gave to his secretary, Isa Cauvern to review. Isa Cauvern and her husband Albert Cauvern, a writer, subsequently authored the first version of the diary.

Upon submitting the diary for publication, questions were raised by some potential publishers as to whether Isa and Albert Cauvern, who assisted Otto in typing out the work, used the original diaries or whether they took it directly from Mr. Frank’s personal transcription, but it is known for certain now that the American author, Meyer Levin wrote the third and final edition which became the finished end-product. Meyer Levin was a Jewish author and journalist, who lived for many years in France, where he met Otto Frank around 1949.

If ever file number 2241-1956 in the New York County Clerk’s office is opened to public view (highly unlikely I surmise) and its contents widely publicised, then the true nature of this work will be exposed for all to witness. Misrepresentation, exaggeration and falsification has too often coloured the judgment of otherwise decent people and if Frank used the work of Meyer Levin to present to the world what we have been led to believe is the literary work of his daughter, wholly or in part, then the truth should be exposed. To label fiction as fact can never be justified nor should it be condoned.

How do we know that (((Meyer Levin))) did not "modify" Anne's story?

We don't.

Otto sued two Germans, Ernst Romer and Edgar Geiss in 1980 for distributing literature denouncing the diary as a forgery. The subsequent court case produced a study by official German handwriting experts that determined that everything in the diary was written by the same person but noted that this person (whoever it was) had used a ballpoint pen throughout! Unfortunately for Frank, as stated previously, the ballpoint pen was not available commercially until 1951 whereas Anne was known to have died of typhus in Bergen-Belsen in February 1945.

Oops!

Because of this lawsuit in a German court, the German state forensic bureau, the Bundes Kriminal Amt (BKA) forensically examined the manuscript (which at that point in time consisted of three hardbound notebooks and 324 loose pages bound in a fourth notebook) with specialised forensic equipment. The results of these tests, performed at the BKA laboratories, showed that ‘significant portions’ of the work, including the entire fourth volume, were written with a ballpoint pen and since ballpoint pens were not available before 1951, the BKA concluded those sections must have been added subsequently and fraudulently.

More importantly perhaps, the BKA investigation clearly determined that none of the diary handwriting matched known examples of Anne’s handwriting. The German magazine, ‘Der Spiegel’ published an account of this report alleging that some editing post-dated 1951 and an earlier expert had determined that all the writing in the journal was by the same hand and thus that the entire diary was a post-war fake.

This BKA exposé, as a result of the frantic lobbying of Jewish/Zionist interests was immediately retracted but later ‘inadvertently’ released to researchers in the United States. I invite the reader to draw his / her own conclusions from this fact.

Lays to rest any FALSE claim that there were "insignificant traces" of ball point pen.

For what reasons could this fraud have been perpetrated? Were the reasons simply for financial gain or was there a more sinister motive underlying its execution? Could it be part of the overall conspiracy to gain sympathy for the Zionist cause by exaggerating Jewish suffering and casting further aspersions on Nazi activities or is this proposition too unrealistic to contemplate seriously?

You decide for yourself, but whatever the reason for it, the end result is that the memory of an innocent child-victim has been sullied by being blatantly used either for personal, monetary gain or on behalf of a minority but massively influential group, Zionism in order to surreptitiously benefit certain vested interests. However, perhaps more importantly, this shameful episode further demonstrates how simple is the process by which it is possible to deceive huge numbers of people on virtually any subject one could choose by the simple expedient of powerful and persistent propaganda techniques and the constant, incessant repetition of statements designed to create a false but long-lasting impression.

Reminds me of Covid-19 ...

http://falsificationofhistory.co.uk/false-history/the-faked-diary-of-anne-frank/

2
MAG768720 2 points ago +2 / -0

The question I have is, why isn’t the IRS automatically deducting from their paycheck?

Very interesting question. One possible answer would be: IRS agent never filed a W4 form, so there was no legal basis to deduct. Or possibly, they did but checked "exempt" on the form, which I hear is what a lot of illegal aliens do.

5
MAG768720 5 points ago +5 / -0

Income tax is not illegal nor unconstitutional.

It's just that the vast majority of Americans have no legal requirement to pay it.

They are deceived and coerced into paying it.

It is an excise tax on engaging in a federal privilege, and nothing more.

https://losthorizons.com/Cracking_the_Code.htm

Ironically, IRS agents WOULD be required to pay it. UNLESS ... they are NOT government employees. This has been the claim of some people for many years -- that IRS is not a government agency (just like the Federal Reserve is not), and therefore IRS agents are not federal government employees.

I don't know the specifics of that, but interesting considering this story.

view more: Next ›