Unjabbed turned away from church...
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (211)
sorted by:
People can lie one time and tell the truth another, as it suits them. The CDC can quote actual figures and then lie to your face about what they say and mean.
The death and injury numbers from the shots are huge. The data on CDC and VAERS are indicators of this, even if ever other scrap of their sites is pure crap. We know the numbers are huge, and these "unbiased" sites can sway normies.
You sound like one of those leftists, who can see individuals, but lump everyone into stereotypical groups. They think all black people are too stupid to get an id card, for example.
FAIL YOU understand zero about the VAERS reporting system. VAERS is a data collection system for post-innoculoation adverse events - undesirable outcomes. ANYONE can enter a report; false reports - like a 2yo dying - are not uncommon.
People report true associated adverse events - death, anaphylaxis, blood clots. They can report true UNassociated events - pregnancy. They can even report nonsense - becoming the hulk. EVERYTHING and ANYTHING that happens following vaccination that someone doesn't like after being vaccinated gets reported.
It is a system for collecting RAW DATA. The End.
YOU are listening to imbeciles who don't know how to interpret RAW DATA. They are a number that confirms their bias and run with it. They don't investigate jackshit. They just use the number available to spread misinformation. AND YOU, not knowing any better, EAT IT UP.
Of 23 serious health outcomes none were "significantly higher for individuals 1 to 21 days after vaccination compared with similar individuals at 22 to 42 days after vaccination."
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2784015
I'm pretty sure I know what your next false narrative will be after reading that. But, I'll hold on to my preemptive response, so I can show how you're continually misled.
You sound like one of those global conspiracy Qnuts who EXEMPLIFY Dunning-Kruger.
I know that it's self-reported and therefore inaccurate, but the inaccuracy should be approximately the same for all events being report. It means that, if there are thousands of times more reports on one shot than another, then the first shot is probably way more dangerous. You won't have absolute numbers, but you can see the relative danger. It's logic, of which you seem to be in short supply.
What you said is exactly why you (or anyone else unlearned) SHOULD NOT BE MAKING STATEMENTS ABOUT VAERS.
No. You saying, the "inaccuracy should be approximately the same for all events being report[ed]" merely demonstrates you don't understand what you're talking about and that your logic is flawed.
Why would pregnancies be reported at the same rate? Hint, only 49.9% the population can get pregnant. Why would erectile dysfunction be reported similarly when only 51.1% of the population can be affected? Why would lightening strikes (1) even be reported and (2) of the average 43 lightening strikes that cause 4-5 deaths every year lead you to believe nearly 25% are COVID related? (I'm being facetious here to show how stats are twisted to say what they don't.)
So, no, thousands of more reports on one ABSOLUTELY does not mean one is more dangerous than another. My examples above show you've not thought about it critically, i.e. why does your argument not support your position. You should learn to try to disprove what you believe. Data must be cleaned before any proper, reliable, it relevant analysis can be done.
As far as who's logic is lacking, let's just pretend the 10,688 deaths reported to VAERDS, as of December 20, 2021, were caused by the various vaccines. We won't filter any of them and just pretend vaccines cause all of them.
What logic leads to the conclusion to not get vaccinated when 54.7M cases of COVID has resulted in >825K Americans (1.5%) dead? (No offense if you're not American, I recognize >5.6M people worldwide have died from COVID?).
How does your logic justify not getting vax'd when 1.5% of confirmed COVID cases die balanced against ~500M doses administered causing a pretend (purposeful overinflation) 10,688 deaths or 0.0021%?
In what universe does even common sense tell you it's a good idea to avoid a preventative measure that reduces the probability of death ( not to mention the myriad other serious, debilitating health conditions we aren't even bothering to address) by more than three (3) factors of magnitude. Not just three times, but three factors of magnitude. (Hint, magnitude is a measure is decimal movement.)
Do, please feel free to elucidate on where EXACTLY my logic is in short supply. This should be eminently entertaining.
First of all, you are incorrect in stating that over 825,000 Americans have died of COVID. The CDC has merely moved deaths from the flu column over to the COVID column. There was a thorough analysis of the CDC data published on the Johns Hopkins website. If there had been a real COVID epidemic, total deaths from all causes would have increased dramatically. But they didn't.
People are dying from the shot. Very few people are dying from the COVID, especially among the ones of us who refused the shots.
I will never get the shots. I saw what happened in 1976 with the swine flu shots. Those shots caused thousands of people to get various illnesses that could not be otherwise explained. There were only 25 or so deaths from the shot, and they stopped the shots right then. With many thousands of reported deaths from the COVID shots, you know many more than 25 are absolutely from the shots. So the shots should have been stopped long ago.
I haven't had any shots, I have never worn a mask, and I've never stayed home and hid like some of you idiots. I have an immune system. I have never had the flu in 60+ years, and I don't intend on getting it injected into me. I won't get tested either. They can't say you've got COVID, if you haven't taken a test.