If President Trump supporting the vaxx is good for our cause, then we should do it too. Right?

posted 2 years ago by Wexit-Delecto 2 years ago by Wexit-Delecto +17 / -3

Obviously not. So how’s it help us when he does it but not when we do it? (It doesn’t?)

This whole, “Trump supporting the vaxx helps us” push reminds me of the “they’re pulling kids from the tunnels” and other such nonsense.

66 comments

66 comments share save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (66)

sorted by:

▲ 0 ▼

– Wexit-Delecto [S] 0 points 2 years ago +1 / -1

I'm asking, "where is the line, on one side of which we should oppose the vaxx, and on the other side of which we most effectively oppose the vaxx by supporting it"? Since you are so ardent that this line exists, surely you could point it out? Perhaps enunciate as to why the line lies where it does?

You go on to say that the line about which I'm inquiring is drawn such that it separates those not under duress from those who are. Which is the best answer I've received so far, despite asking this same question in various forms probably 40 times across all our boards today.

But, if President Trump has a gun to his head, what other compromised decisions has he made? To me, he has looked comp'd since 1/6, when he was whisked away in a car and never appeared at the capitol like he said he would. In that case, not acting on the nov 2020 insurrection was a comp'd decision. Further, what help would electing a comp'd president's suggestions for 2022 do for us, and what of 2024?

permalink parent save report block reply

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q