Seems to sync with the poll data in this post. From another post yesterday—

▼ Qasar 1 day ago +7 / -0

Consider a recent poll that basically states the “vaccine-hesitant” (aka “experimental drug created by psychopathic marxist eugenicists - averse” by sane individuals) are pretty well dug into their positions. This article states that only 7% of the un-jabbed would consider getting jabbed if Trump told them to. (Is this the same as “they’re safe, but no one should be forced to take anything”? Depends on interpretation, I suppose). Most non-jabbed say they would be looking at data/stats (and that includes those, like us, who have been looking at data that msm has been deliberately censoring).

So, based on the fact (or premise) that probably 93% of the non-jabbed will still refuse to take this drug, I’m thinking POTUS’s “endorsement” in the Owens interview was a safe (as in wartime safe to minimize casualties) strategy to provide their (the Q-team’s) desired optics for the next steps.

From September 2021:

https://www.cnbc.com/2021/09/10/cnbc-poll-shows-very-little-will-persuade-unvaccinated-americans-to-get-covid-shots.html