I'm getting really tired of this being called an mRNA vaccine. There is so much ignorance, confusion, and generalizations going around about this.
Most of the arguments about this assume 2 things,
1: the vaccine is mRNA (it's not)
2: DNA transcription goes one way, and the vac can't alter your DNA. (also not true)
Time to 'follow the science'
to start, a little about how DNA works.
searchx/startpage: "reverse transcriptase"
- Reverse transcriptase An enzyme that generates DNA
"A reverse transcriptase (RT) is an enzyme used to generate complementary DNA (cDNA) from an RNA template, a process termed reverse transcription. Reverse transcriptases are used by viruses such as HIV and hepatitis B to replicate their genomes, by retrotransposon mobile genetic elements to proliferate within the host genome, and by eukaryotic cells to extend the telomeres at the ends of their linear chromosomes. Contrary to a widely held belief, the process does not violate the flows of genetic information as described by the classical central dogma, as transfers of information from RNA to DNA are explicitly held possible. "
normally info flows from DNA- RNA but we have latent code from old viruses AND DNA repair / anti-cancer code that will try to 'fix' DNA in your cells by repairing it with RNA.
kind of a "look at the RNA floating around, better make sure it source code is in the DNA" situation going on in the body. It doesn't happen 100%, as in it won't update the DNA in all your cells overnight, but it DOES happen, and if it happens in the sperm/eggs it can be passed down.
Now, most people DON'T have mRNA floating around in their blood. even the vaxxed. They mostly have the spike protein coursing through their bodies, which can be transmitted to you but won't directly alter your DNA. You will just make antibodies for the spike proteins you are exposed to.
The people that get vaxed have a not zero chance of DNA alteration in one or more cells in their body, but probably not their entire body.
Ok, now that we have that out of the way, onto the main attraction.
I have noticed this is something that people don't talk about at all. I would like to change this, so please help me spread some of this science info.
The vaccine is NOT mRNA!!!! There are enzymes in your body that go around looking for mRNA, find it, and break it down into component parts to be re-used. mRNA is supposed to create a message to do something, then vanish once that something is done. On-going effects, normally cause continuous streams of RNA to be made.
This was undesirable from the point of vac manufacturers.
So they 'stabilize' it. to keep this normal safe process from happening. How do you keep the RNA from breaking down so fast and sticking around longer? They change it so it's not real RNA and your body doesn't detect it to break it down normally. They do a TON of stuff, under the term 'stabilization', and play it off like all they are doing is adding salt to the mixture and keeping the vax cold. Nothing could be further from the truth.
They are doing 6 things to the 'RNA' that make it, well not really RNA...
-
A 'cap' is put on the start of the RNA. This cap is made out of 3 different sub caps stringed together. 'nucleotide methylation' This 'header' of non-RNA at the start of the RNA does 4 things, makes it hold together better, attracts transcription enzymes to make more than normal proteins out of it, stops the body from recognizing it as foreign, and stops the breakdown enzymes from attaching.
-
A flag is attached between the cap and the RNA that allows the transition enzymes attracted by the cap to latch on and transcribe easier than normal RNA. all 4 of the above molecules are NOT RNA and are NEVER found on normal RNA
-
nucloside modified 'mRNA' RNA normally consists of adenine (A), uracil (U), cytosine (C), and/ or guanine (G) strung together. The 'fraken-RNA' includes the incorporation of modified nucleotides in the mRNA sequence, such as methylated nucleosides or pseudouridine.
Cytidines can also be replaced with numerous chemical modifications, including 5-methylcytidine (m5C); uridines can be converted into 5-methyluridine (m5U), 2-thiouridine (s2U), 5-methoxyuridine (5moU), pseudouridine (ψ) and N1-methylpseudouridine (m1ψ), while adenosines can be replaced by N1-methyladenosine (m1A) and N6-methyladenosine (m6A)
So normally DNA / RNA has an alphabet consisting of 4 letters each, from a total of 5 letters. the DNA->rna process transcribed the 4th letter for the 5th, which is what makes DNA and RNA actually different.
The 'vaccines' introduce 8 new 'letters' to the RNA sequence, that do not get detected by your body as RNA. They get transcribed by the transcriber, sure. but it is NOT RNA. The current batch is using "pseudouridine (ψ)" as a substitute for uridine.
-
Another noncoding flag is put at the end of the sequence, further increasing stability and preventing the breakdown
-
followed by another artificial not even pretend RNA tail at the end to help hold shape for optimal transcription and to prevent breakdown.
-
Encapsulation: normally your body would detect a Frankenstein molecule like this as not RNA and destroy it before it ever gets into your cells to pretend to be RNA. However, the vaccines encapsulate it in something else to stop this from happening. 6a) lipid foam - wrapped up in vacuoles, pretending to be tiny not-cell cells, that look like tiny cells from the outside but are basically empty inside. Your white blood cells will consume these, travel to the heart, and die releasing them to build up in the cardio system (myocarditis) 6b) nanoparticles with iron cores, same problem as the lipid foam but ALSO these make you magnetic 6c) wrapped up in a viral shell, like old school vaccines.
source: National Institute of Health: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8299225/
TL;DR RNA contains URIDINE (U) PSUDO RNA CONTAINS pseudouridine (ψ)
Would these spike proteins be replication incompetent though? I am not sure that. I realize the J&J vax is DNA based and will modify my DNA just slightly just to make my cells code for a spike protein. I have looked at some scientific literature on Pubmed that discusses the adenovector vs the mRNA based vaccine. From what I've read, there isn't long term data on how DNA based adenovector vaccines effect humans years after vaccination. I ended up being bullied and coerced by my mother into getting a vaccine and I happened to choose the J&J as I thought I'd have the lower likely hood of having heart problems as it is a single dose vaccine. I am taking supplements to detox though. Of is quecertin (an ACE inhibitor). I also wonder if the cellular replication is limited by resources that would eventually run out or would it be based on a permanently present genetic blueprint that's transcribed into my cells?
Would this 'slightly modified DNA' pass on to next generation?
Separately, are blood transfusions from non-verified sources out of the question? Or would you think that there is an 'age out' period in which that blood might no longer be tainted?
This is what people are freaking out about when they talk about the chicken vaccine. (merk? I think...) if you vaccinate a chicken it won't get sick, but any babies it has will have zero protection from the disease without the vacc and will die as the vacced act as carriers and will infect the babies. Thus, 100% vacc rate is mandatory, and the disease keeps mutating and the vax has to keep getting updated. ITs known as a huge medical failure in the poultry industry and people are worried humans will get stuck in the same situation.
it's ultimate boomer mentality. 'well I'm vacced and I'M safe, fuck the future generations they can just get the vac like I did' ignoring all the horrible effects on society it will have as the virus gets deadlier and dedlier and the vaccs get more and more vital.
I don't know. I still have questions about whether or not I could end up having problems years from now depending on if the spike proteins at some point stop being produced in my body despite the J&J being a DNA vaccine. My biggest question is, is there a finite amount of resources available to the modified cells that produce the spike protein from the DNA insertion process?